Topic: 🌟 [ANN] [INT] INTUITION FABRIC - Democratized Deep Learning AI on Blockchain - page 2. (Read 9391 times)
June 06, 2017, 08:58:39 AM
That's a closed end fund. This one is completely different
June 05, 2017, 05:30:30 AM
May 28, 2017, 10:00:44 AM
Looks like a clean project..
May 28, 2017, 08:44:05 AM
For the regular Joe how can AI be integrated into blockchain? Do you plan to use some sort of "self contracting smart contracts"?
May 22, 2017, 09:28:15 AM
Here is the short version that is free:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f6Wm6RCSSqRpsJdZTwMsbfkuBlEP1V3QespPn1Dvpn8/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f6Wm6RCSSqRpsJdZTwMsbfkuBlEP1V3QespPn1Dvpn8/edit?usp=sharing
May 16, 2017, 08:20:25 AM
PM me if you can do a translation.
Ok, let's do it. I reserve the Spanish translation. I'll send you my email via PM
May 15, 2017, 10:50:30 PM
I honestly think it's a bad idea to sell the white paper. I understand your principle but people simply won't pay into something new until they know exactly what they are getting themselves into. Referring them to the blog is not helpful for many to decide whether to get a share or not. It has further nothing to do whether they can afford it or not. Just my 2 cents
A shorter version will be made available for free. This will be the version that will be translated.
May 15, 2017, 02:14:29 PM
Wait is this for real? They are selling the whitepaper.
WTF.
WTF.
May 15, 2017, 09:10:42 AM
I honestly think it's a bad idea to sell the white paper. ........
Wait is this for real? They are selling the whitepaper.
WTF.
May 15, 2017, 09:07:11 AM
I honestly think it's a bad idea to sell the white paper. I understand your principle but people simply won't pay into something new until they know exactly what they are getting themselves into. Referring them to the blog is not helpful for many to decide whether to get a share or not. It has further nothing to do whether they can afford it or not. Just my 2 cents
May 14, 2017, 10:20:23 AM
Any updates on the free whitepaper?
May 14, 2017, 09:27:15 AM
I'm thinking about doing the Dutch translation.
May 14, 2017, 03:39:33 AM
Serbian translation reserved for me, Send PM if you accept 
May 13, 2017, 08:57:48 PM
What price for token in upcoming ico?
May 12, 2017, 05:39:52 AM
Is the token sale separate from the tokens (free) you get from points collection?
Yes, tokens will be allocated for the bounties.
May 12, 2017, 04:30:28 AM
Is the token sale separate from the tokens (free) you get from points collection?
May 11, 2017, 01:42:10 PM
Did you compare the contents?
The original title of the NEM thread was "NEM :: descendant of NXT"
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6348606
So there you go, I claim ownership to the original idea of NEM. Spin it however you want, but the facts are right there to all to see.
Anyway, too bad I'm not a multi-millionaire right now. But at least that it validates my initial instincts on what will work.
Do you also claim to be the inventor of "forking"?
May 11, 2017, 01:38:59 PM
Did you compare the contents?
The original title of the NEM thread was "NEM :: descendant of NXT"
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6348606
So there you go, I claim ownership to the original idea of NEM. Spin it however you want, but the facts are right there to all to see.
Anyway, too bad I'm not a multi-millionaire right now. But at least that it validates my initial instincts on what will work.
May 11, 2017, 01:32:41 PM
Quoted.
Especially like this part: "NEM copied the original idea and is actually doing very well indeed"
Exactly, here's the evidence:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nex-nxt-reimagined-398461 "[NEX] Nxt Reimagined" dated January 4, 2014
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nem-nem-new-economy-movement-no-envy-movement-updatesdiscussion-thread-426303 "[NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement" dated January 21, 2014
As I said, my mistake for being concerned about the legal issues.
Thanks for the links, saved me some time.
So this was basically your "idea" on January 4th 2014, and now you imply that NEM copied this "idea":
Yes, January 4th is two weeks before January 21st.
NEM followed the same idea of creating a better Nxt. The original development and marketing strategy was the same.
Here a discussion on the same subject: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6348606
But props. goes to NEM for executing very well.
You can believe whatever you want, but the evidence is right there for everyone to see.
Did you compare the contents?
May 11, 2017, 01:26:40 PM
Quoted.
Especially like this part: "NEM copied the original idea and is actually doing very well indeed"
Exactly, here's the evidence:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nex-nxt-reimagined-398461 "[NEX] Nxt Reimagined" dated January 4, 2014
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nem-nem-new-economy-movement-no-envy-movement-updatesdiscussion-thread-426303 "[NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement" dated January 21, 2014
As I said, my mistake for being concerned about the legal issues.
Thanks for the links, saved me some time.
So this was basically your "idea" on January 4th 2014, and now you imply that NEM copied this "idea":
Yes, January 4th is two weeks before January 21st.
NEM followed the same idea of creating a better Nxt. The original development and marketing strategy was the same.
Here a discussion on the same subject: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6348606
Quote
That's from 19 January - 3 months ago!! What date did the rule about altcoin giveaways come into force?
That thread was from a time when FrictionlessCoin started NEX, a clone NXT. Why wasn't he banned?
A whole bunch of people made 'mock' clone threads to send him up. I think the giveaway rule started AFTER that time.
Why did MadCow get banned and not these users? They made mock NEX threads on the same date 19th January 2014. utopian Future later started a new thread when NEM bacame 'serious', but at the start the original NEM thread was exactly the same style as the ME.TOO thread.
2Kool4Skool made NEXX - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nexx-descendant-of-nex-descendant-of-nxt-imagine-more-fairness-422272
Utopianfuture made NEM - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nem-4-billions-coins-part-1-this-thread-is-no-longer-used-422129
That thread was from a time when FrictionlessCoin started NEX, a clone NXT. Why wasn't he banned?
A whole bunch of people made 'mock' clone threads to send him up. I think the giveaway rule started AFTER that time.
Why did MadCow get banned and not these users? They made mock NEX threads on the same date 19th January 2014. utopian Future later started a new thread when NEM bacame 'serious', but at the start the original NEM thread was exactly the same style as the ME.TOO thread.
2Kool4Skool made NEXX - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nexx-descendant-of-nex-descendant-of-nxt-imagine-more-fairness-422272
Utopianfuture made NEM - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nem-4-billions-coins-part-1-this-thread-is-no-longer-used-422129
But props. goes to NEM for executing very well.
You can believe whatever you want, but the evidence is right there for everyone to see.
Jump to: