Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 163. (Read 473154 times)

So you haven't sold your node then ??  You've just spent this past year trying to devalue your own investment. Why ? this has got to be the dumbest thing I've read in a long time.

Personally I'm thinking you don't own a node and have never owned one. You've just tangled yourself up in your own bullshit. 

You believe I sold my node? You'll believe anything apparently. Except if it's negative against ION.

So, how about them addresses? Or are you gonna shill dodge that question?

How do you classify the 45 cents thing? In btc? cause thats inadvertant btc increase not ion increase.

Good I'm glad for you that your just trolling

So your MN was purchased from the 8 to 1 conversion

XPY today = 1 cent
ION today = 45 cents 

You said you sold your MN, I bet you sold it for a lot more than $200. A year ago Ionomy gave you the opportunity to exchange your worthless XPY into something of value and you then spend all your time trying to piss all over them  Then you blame me and wild for making you sell early 

I hope your part of the GAW suit, you get some money back and you learn from your mistakes. At some point you need to stop blaming others and take some responsibility for your catalogue bad decisions.

lies... they knew it was a scam they just took advantage of it because it was good.

Matlack isn't anything like garza.... he doesn't care about profits just bringing games to the masses and being a disciple maker. korvas agrees... korvas thinks there is a 0% chance matlack is a bad actor, unless he wants to correct me.

Erm... as a community whose communal investing track record includes such luminaries as GAW, Lendcoin and scrypt.cc to name but a few, I feel you'd probably do better to not push that door.

How are you valuing ion price increases? In satoshi, USD or btc? Its important because your measure can't change to meet the ol good news outlook. I'd like to know for all future valuations.

Also you could get rid of these guys easy.. just ask leoC to blackmail them.

No. The Ionomy team is choosing to run a 'video game developing company' front from the UK. Not a cloud mining ponzi.
Where your team chooses to communicate this type of fraud is irrelevant. As always your showing your boring character to try to obscure inquiries.
Ya wanker 


Yes, definitely liars and thieves.
As pointed out in these threads.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18713283 - Your LeoC=korvas128. You tried to intimidate and blackmail the Ethereum project/group.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18813282 - Jordan registers the UK shells. Jason helps and supports the programming fraud.


Please keep signing in, everyday. All of you.
It allows the FBI, SEC, Homeland Security, and others know exactly how dumb your willing to be.


You tell us. Your the one devoid of ethics or morals.
You always get this way when you get pinned down in either technical questions or attempting change the subject matter.
Sort of like a certain lizard


Your team is the one trolling, scamming, on BCT.
I sincerely hope your team is in good health to answer the US-DOJ in the coming months 

It's quite amusing how korvas128 is now shilling the price of ION when Gravity turned out to be shit. Did a complete 180 from when the price was shit and he was shilling the game and team's immense capabilities.

How's that new-and-improved Gravity coming? Or the alpha of the second game?

BTW even the price is going backwards lately, when many other shitcoins are going up... nice use of creative USD math but you could have bought $1000 worth of nearly any top 10 coin on Polo and you'd probably have more USD now AND proper liquidity should you choose to take the profit. Try that with ION, which struggles to get 2 BTC daily volume.

But what else can you expect from these geniuses:



Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Oh, so the ION team has a fledging social and marketing plan in place? It sure shows by the amount of weekly Gravity players.

Has the team posted the address of all the pre-mine coins? And their MN addresses to ensure generated coins aren't used for nefarious purposes? I don't care how long they're around, until they post that information I don't trust them one bit. I didn't pay a thing for my MN cause I listened to MrCoins and kept buying shit ton of Paycoin so I traded them in. Otherwise I haven't given the team a single sayoshi. Too shady of an operation. Once all premine coins and coins generated from the premine staking are Blockchain accountable, things may have a chance. Until then, you can spout as many crossed out number you want at me, too risky by crypto standards.

Do you honestly think that the Ionomy team are running their business like a Garza type operation because they don't use BCT as a medium of communication ? or answer your questions ?

Do you also think that those invested in Ionomy are either thieves or to stupid to figure stuff out for themselves ? is this why it's been a year now and your still posting the same concerns you had then.

How long do the Ionomy team need to be around for before you figure out that you got this one wrong..... 1,2,3, 4, 10 or 20 years ?


I admire your tenacity but do the sums. Had you invested $1,000 when you first posted on this thread how much more would your investment be worth If you decided to press the sell button now.  $1,000, $2,000, $4,000, $8,000 , $16,000. How much more does ION need to increase in value for you to change your mind 25 cents, 50 cents, $1, $5, $10......

Or is this an emotional thing ?

I sincerely hope it's not emotional as eventually it will cause you a ton of pain. I hope your just trolling  .

They only have a shill campaign. In typical Garza fashion, they expect the community to do all the leg work of promoting the coin.  Which equates to shill hype tweets by MrCoins then everyone gushes over how awesome said quote is. Cheerleading and spirit fingers all around😜

some social campaign

It would be nice to also provide the addresses for the pre-mine coins and their corresponding MasterNodes. This let's potential investors know that the team isn't doing nefarious things with the free coins they made. This shouldn't be a problem to provide said basic information, should it? Just making sure both sides of the story are being told evenly.

Could you also clear up the one game per month declaration that is in the white paper? Wouldn't want to confuse potential investors, seeing that the white paper is strayed from rather significantly. If the team won't update the white paper, it's the responsibility of outspoken members such as yourself to pick up their slack. Do the right thing, not what makes you richer.

ion is a great coin and has a great community, check it out.  Here are some links to get you started:
https://news.ionomy.com | http://ion.community | https://hub.ionomy.com | http://ion.nodes4u.com | https://masternodes.ionomy.com | https://support.ionomy.com | http://ionomy.wiki | https://ionomy.slack.com

I always questioned how bounties would be applied. The pathetic bounty amounts paid for projects is funded easily by what their premine turned to masternodes spits out. So basically they expect everyone else to make all the content, pay the bounties small with masternode rewards, then act like the visionaries that made something wonderful.

So far i see
- cloned coin x 2. was it blackcoin meets dash first? then transfer coin
- 1 game made correction still in the works due to korvas's insistence that its not yet completed (gravity)
- hosted masternode site
- coin convert (btw this is just shapeshift skeleton api used on the site so its not actually a created product)

There really isn't a lot of work there. My concern is that those few working on it pay themselves a weekly high wage from bounty coins so they basically wash the premine to themselves in other addresses. All premine's are evil unless there is 100% verifiable proof and transparency of said funds. The only premine i've seen that comes close to being actually decent is that spells of genesis one where the coins are locked in multisig and community heads i think andreas autonopolous, etc have keys and they release to team funds on milestone achievements.. thats how it should be done. Another party in noway involved in the project should be fund releasers.

The premine for ion is not transparent... there is NO WAY you can prove its being used correctly with hard facts... and the only way you can show its being misused is if you see it move on the blockchain to exchanges etc in big amounts. This is why governments with tax funds have ledgers etc showing where expenses going and why the government does budgets and shows income / outgoing.

Wildshark was right when he said no sane investor would invest without seeing quarterly financials etc... i hope his next question to the team is asking for those... as he did say investors should ask for them and being the intelligent investor he makes himself out to be surely he wouldn't be investing without asking the team for them.

Another question: Isn't that what the dev bounty funds are for? Wasn't there like 2+ million coins for bounties? (That number could be off, I just remember hearing that) Why the need for the community to raise funds for devs? Are team Ionomy not giving out bounties? And there should be a ton more coins since they are sitting in MasterNodes.

Trashed?

Ok, so Shark perhaps could have asked his questions in a less trolly way. But he didn't, that's Shark FFS. And all this sounds just like Garza's "be respectful" rule, which he applied copiously to dissenters but never to himself. Considering how much vile shit is being peddled by psionic and other ion-prefixed "members" on slack and elsewhere, blowing a fuse over a "moot" question by one of their own whales on the grounds of it being "insulting" is truly Garza-level hypocritical. So is the "good guys, bad guys" fallacy.

But hey, every bagholder seems to be happy with this attitude that questions are the problem, and not the lack of answers. So what do I know.  


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

I guess I see it a bit different. If I was in psionic' shoes, I would be appreciative of the question as it is a question to make sure said initiative is on the up and up. Constructive criticism only makes things better. When someone can't handle constructive criticism, shit goes haywire. That is the point of a community, to help each other out to make sure everything is legit. Psionic seems to have gone on a power trip cause someone posed a valid question to his initiative.

Now his reaction is going to cause people to not question things for fear of being ridiculed. Not good for a project with limited resources that relies on its community for input.

With a MN involved, I could see how there could be legal concern. One little trip up could put it on the wrong side of the legal fence. Being critical of it only helps to keep it kosher. But it seems like someone didn't like being questioned. Psionic a behavior would keep me as an investor far away from any aspect he is involved in. But that is just me, but I'm sure many other people would agree.

The question Wild asked was MOOT based on the fact the reason for starting the initiative was to help solo Developers. The discussion of this was over 3 days in the making with no profit to be made off of the MN that would of been created. The question is a valid one but MOOT if you where paying attention to what the initiative was about. Now Psionic got mad cause he tried to start something to help the community and it gets trashed by someone who was not even apart of it in the end. So here we are with no Initiative and 2 people mad. (This is my personal view of this)