Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 266. (Read 473124 times)

He doesn't know its obvious. Sharkie only responds where he sees fit and ignores questions on his statements e.g. sane investors would check quarterly and yearly financials which ionomy and graval has none. Sharkie puts his foot in his mouth a lot then just decides to not respond because you know if you don't sell you haven't lost any money and if you close your eyes its not there if you can't see it.

Wildshark is also a dangerous person to take any advice from or opinion. He takes everything Huey aka Adam Matlack says at face value and considers a statement from Huey as "proof" of something. On that same line of reasoning Adam Matlack took what Garza said as "proof" and we know how that turned out. Proof is actual figures and a validated line of thinking, not a comment by someone especially a human being which are prone to tell lies / bend truths where they see fit... its in our nature.

Wildshark tends to think if he asks huey something and gets an answer then that is the truth. This is incorrect as its not a validated statement.

@MrCoins shit as well... i don't understand his its 97% as efficient... thats complete utter shit. Its actually 97% of the price you would pay i.e. a 3% fee for doing it that way. Efficiency doesn't equate into it as its not work thats saved when we are talking money!

Who seriously says my job is 50% as efficient as yours when talking pay amounts?

You proved time and time again that you are completely unable to provide any answer to any question. How many times do I have to ask before you say where the pool of coins is coming from.

Again, where are those coins coming from?

The Ionomy ball is starting to roll...

To bad suchmoon's Bitcointalk ION agenda document can't keep up with the pace.. A lot of crypto people are depending on the "right" answers to IONs...

So to summarize, "imminent" game launch and being on other exchanges is longer than 10 days, and the new "feature" of giving team ION actual useful coins that they can turn into BTC and/or dollars in exchange for useless ions is a good thing.

Glad to see things moving along swimmingly.

or you can use suchmoon's unbiased "right" answer cause the "team" is not transparent:

Let's see what the email from Ionomy describing the new "Buy ION" service says and go from there...

I'm not the one coming up with these things like "buy pressure" or "pool" of coins. I'm sure in your deranged whale mind this somehow means that it's my job to explain it... but it's not. So you don't have an answer then? Parroted another phrase with no clue what it means? Well done sharkie. You're exactly the sort of whale ionomy needs. The clueless shilly sort.

Here's another question that needs to be added to suchmoon's Bitcointalk ION agenda that has the unbiased "right" answer... my answer is very basis being a Whale in the Ionomy structure and shouldn't be used in the document...

Suchmoon is got a lot of work to get her document up to snuff for the crypto community to use!!!

or you can use suchmoon's unbiased "right" answer cause the "team" is not transparent:

What are those "IONs being maintained by Ionomy"? Where did they come from?

I thought it was a good laugh saying the pool would be created from Cryptobuds account and theirfore it wouldn't be shady. Don't you remember that Cryptobuds bought enough IONs to run a Masternode??? and would gladly use them to prime the ION purchasing pool... lol

The "real" answer is there is a pool of IONs being maintained by Ionomy (ION purchasing pool), that are being used to "buy the IONs" for instant transaction. The bid is placed on the Ionomy market and when that trade occurs, the IONs are added back into the pool to replenish it for consecutive ION purchases...

Why are you laughing? Seriously, where will this pool of IONs come from? If they are not enough on the exchange, where do the extra come from?

Sharkie seems to have gone off the deep end. Did he just describe ionomy as a ponzi structure?

i dont think thats true. if you look at his github:

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/ion

yes ive read about the multichain thing but it doesnt change my argument (good for them its the right direction). are they not worried about possible legal problems when operating from/in US? dash is spending 50k to solve some of their own questions

As far as I know that sherlockcoin guy has been on since the start but thanks for your opinion.

Point being? BTW multichain will be used to make ATOMS on chain assets as per huey. But since your a member of slack you already knew that

I got to laugh at this one and say the pool comes from your account so this Ionomy service is NOT shady!!!

Now the question is: where did that pool of IONs come from? If the IONs are coming from the "team", then this just got real shady as the "team" controls the premine.

No offense, but I don't think anyone on this thread believes or respects any words that come out of Mr coins mouth.

@suchmoon Your proof for your question can be "notice the small buy orders in the Ionomy exchange that have been appearing since yesterday". When the email goes out, the process will be explained. This buy support will build and over time it could be a significant dampener on potential future dumps on the Ionomy exchange...


i'm guessing that Ionomy has a pool of IONs that they are using to fill the order immediately and the buy order sits on the exchange... I will get a "real" answer when Huey wakes up...

What happens if there isn't enough ION coins for sale on the internal exchange? Does the transfer get put in hold until those coins become available? Or do those coins come from some other source?