Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 281. (Read 473124 times)

WildShill, I'm not here to play the ION guessing games. I am here to ask questions and get answers. If you want to play guessing games, go to Slack or Iontalk.net and play your games there. If you have me a bottle of scotch, I wouldn't touch it. I don't want anything that is tainted with ION or XPY. I'd ask you some questions but don't have the time or patience to watch you dance around them for 10 posts.

Keep up the good work ION shills of dancing around questions and invoking every logical gala y in the book. Keep believing. And trusting and you will soon be rich!

Not able to guess maybe because it doesn't "play into"? Less scotch and more reading is in order for you sharkie.


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Here's a short video explaining Crypto Garvity & Ionomy Funding System:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mq07XlsNLg

It shows how close the design of Ionomy is like previous coins... lol

@CryptoBuds All this time and you were not able to guess how the Ionomy Exchange plays into the ION purchase pool? I take back my offer for the bottle of scotch... You should of tried thinking outside your XPY box...

Keep up the good work BCT trolls on not believing ION is innovation and very different from XPY!!!

korvas128,

"fabricate another post by me" sounds a lot like the accusation that I've fabricated your post(s) in the past, which you obviously couldn't show back then but you will keep repeating that until it "becomes true" in your little retarded universe, right?

Anyway, happy election day, and please shill some more about the newest "skin" for stakers. Don't forget to explain how much sense it makes to go from


to


to


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

So what's the deal with this latest promotion? The team still desperately needs money? Not even selling IONs this time, just some worthless PNGs.

Very short "seasons" too. More like "weekly" promotions now. Here is an idea for next week:


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Furniture stores have them all the time, excellent fit for ionomy.

-Both XPY and ION have a centralized staker programs that encourages you to store your coins locked up with the        "team"
-Stakers skins?
-Both XPY and ION were heavily pre-mined
-Both XPY and ION are very in-transparent
-Both XPY and ION are hyper inflating POS (proof of stake) coins
-Both XPY and ION are/were clone coins that provided no new features or advancements
-Both XPY and ION are not able to be used to purchase much, if anything.
-Both XPY and ION had a masternode type feature (XPY had PCs, ION has MNs)

Big difference:
The creator of XPY was smart enough to scam a ton of people. The creator of ION was either too stupid or too greedy to realize XPY was a scam when it was blatantly obvious and proof was around. Similar: both were started with a rocky foundation.

And I'm not talking about XPY code being in the ION code. Open your eyes and take a step back. It looks like ION is followinng step by step with the XPY plan. The team is even asking for more BTC before actually releasing anything, just like Garza and XPY.

And I address questions directed to me. I'm not an ION shill so I will answer the question as directly as I am capable of. I won't dance around the question or highlight words and change their colors. Simple.

XPY did not "evolve" from Peercoin, it's a badly implemented shitclone of Peercoin with "prime controllers" that didn't really do anything else but create hyperinflation.

There is no "evolution" in ION either. It's a lazy shitclone of DASH and Blackcoin. Does the ION wallet work correctly already? I guess not, because Ionomy does not want you to use it. Instead, Ionomy wants users to lock their coins in "masternodes" similiar to "prime controllers" - which is just one more parallel between XPY and ION.

The ION "whitepaper" is a collection of marketing drivel and nonsense. Which also reminds of Paycoin quite a bit.

Nope all ties were cut and finally severed when the ICO happened

XPY were exchanged to ION for a rate of 8:1 during the ICO phase.

This was part of the transition process which allowed existing customers to transition to ION

XPY.io was rebranded to Ionomy.

An obvious decision as the company not longer used or supported XPY

Adam Huey shilled for GAW/Paycoin:  
http://archive.is/pEsCb

So he was a customer that got screwed over like many other people. Garza didn't steal millions from just one person.  

"no link exists" oh really, wow

A link did exist but that was a long time ago. IF there was even a 0.000000001% chance of a link to either Garza or the XPY dev team then we wouldn't be having this conversation I'd be long gone.

If you must know the split from GAW happened when he fired his dev team. And the split between XPY DEV team happened just before the ICO.

---

Short answer

XPY evolved from Peercoin

ION evolved from DASH / Blackcoin

Long answer = read the whitepaper

What bit of XPY is in ION don't ignore this question answer it I'd really like to know

How can you say comparing ION to XPY is as wrong as comparing ION to LTC? ION and XPY are almost the exact same thing...tell me the differences. ION and LTC are completely different ball games. Again, you heave some fine Paycoiner logic.

XPY were exchanged to ION for a rate of 8:1 during the ICO phase.
XPY.io was rebranded to Ionomy.
Adam Huey shilled for GAW/Paycoin:  
http://archive.is/pEsCb
"no link exists" oh really, wow

It's not a case of winning it's a case of staying on topic. Staying on topic is a rule that applies to everybody even YOU..... it cuts both ways

You've had 7 months of trying to link XPY & ION when no link exists,  I'm glad to see moderators applying rules fairly.

A suggestion though is you should change the title of your thread to

ButtHurts Anonymous ---- Bum still sore after Garza then click here

Comparing ION to XPY is wrong it's like comparing ION to LTC WRONG WRONG WRONG. Please stay as I like our conversations just follow forum rules.

Thanks.

Ok, shilly paycoiners, you win. I have decided to start an ION/XPY thread where you can post your Garza butthurt as much as you want:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ion-ionomy-worthy-successor-to-xpy-100-premined-garza-would-be-proud-1673001

See, Garza is even in the title. You're welcome.

why does ion look like a shitcoin? (for now lets ignore the premine and the abuse of it via the halloween pngs. the first sign of it going from a shitcoin to a full on scam):

what happened to the original coin "dev" they used? easy, they hired someone to do the clone job and then they had no real dev for months and months while saying they did. too bad their github disagrees with that statement. take a look at the activity there after half a year+   let me fill in their excuse for you: they have a private git somewhere thats used for testing purposes and its only for the team to see. oh snap the same excuse they used in the past. see its easy to tell people that progress is being made when no one can verify it (or contribute to). less than month ago they had to hire a new guy (soopy452000 from here) to make any progress at all. dont hold your breath

then again they dont use github like its supposed to be used either. take a look at the ion repo. its further proof they hired a one shot shitcoin cloner who provided the end result in a tarball and they just imported all that into github. creates confidence for any dev wanting to get involved   name one successful altcoin that does things this way? anyways everything is coming as an afterthought to these people and paying 1 guy for some part time work is not magically turning this into a real altcoin

on top of that the centralized nature of everything from coin to platform ... oh god  

ps: i forgot the revenue model where they will take a premium on top of the app store prices. makes no sense when your community is 100 people upcoming devs could leverage. yes let me pay you huge % to get access to this precious community!

The current ionomy "team" is the same "team" that tried to resuscitate XPY for a year, during which time XPY went from ~$0.50 to ~$0.02. After having thoroughly failed with XPY the "team" created their own hyperinflating coin - ION (currently down ~50% since the ICO), rebranded "xpy.io" into "ionomy.com", and exchanged XPY to ION at an 8:1 rate. Here is the ionomy announcement:

http://archive.is/tuWVB

You mean you don't want any.... your shout.... hopefully it will be a forever thing with you 

But WildShill, nobody wants your premined, intransparent, hyperinflating scam coin.

Community Masternode is currently paying out over 100% APR...

The current rate of Ionomy Stakers are less at 90% APR (with a subscription and Electron boost)

Both methods get you "free" coin without having to provide 24/7 computer resources...

Guaranteed, that's why they won't accept ION. They won't accept ION for anything till the market has enough depth for them to dump IONs on. And the rate and attitude they are carrying on with, there will never be enough market depth.

And remember, this isn't a trading coin. It's a long term investment filled with much innovation.

bet you the btc huey gets from them rises more in profit in the time than the ion they pay him in btc does .

Who care is you double your investment. What matters is the value of said coins after one year. You could double your investment while losing money. Paycoiner logic at its finest.