Its not a case of being an ion salesman. Im asking how you arrived at your conclusion that ion is a good investment. I've shown some figures for potential for abuse for the premine and masternodes. Team ion has not refuted this claim or agreed with it.
I don't think anyone here is wanting you to speak your background knowledge in the hopes of stealing all your profits. Its a simple question as we haven't to this date seen any facts showing its a good investment. Saying you aren't sharing your homework is a bit like mrcoins like there is a select few that are smarter than the collective posting information against it being a good investment. We aren't dense but are honestly interested in how people are seeing potential in it. Please show some of your homework... even a partial amount so others can understand. Unless its just i have a feeling and adam is a good guy.
This doesn't mean you are hyping it means you are showing some validation on why you do it. Just like myself and others posting facts and figures against aren't "trolls" we are showing validation on the against. People mix these terms up.
Personally i don't think anyone has facts and figures that is why they say they aren't sharing.
If ion was a good investment then team ion would be releasing this information to encourage people to buy ion because lets face it more crowd funds means more things they can do right? It works against them if they don't sell premine. Unless... its an insider trading platform for a select few with money to screw everyone else out of it? Is that why people don't want ot release any of their homework? Have you all cheated and looked in the back at the answers first?
Having read through some of the Slack messages for the last few days, I can see that they appear to have very little interest in answering questions. Any attempts to raise most of the issues already raised on this forum were batted off as 'we're too busy to answer' and 'the person who's responsibility it is to answer isn't available to answer right now' (the owner of the Ionomy account on here is apparently suffering from some personal issues at the moment, which presumably prevents any other members of their 'management team' from responding too -- a sad 'team' affliction indeed).
When questioned by a loyal follower on slack about the potential scenario of the ICO not selling out, Matlack reluctantly explained that any remaining ICO coins would be used to incentivise developers for future games. I'm sure that'll work out well for them.
I really get the overbearing impression that despite their claims to be friendly and open and fun and whatnot, they'd really rather that their 'community' remains made up of the same core of people who already largely support what the ION team are doing, who are unsurprisingly most of the people who supported paycoin from the beginning. They've been 'together' for a long time now, and they've formed a very dense clique that's difficult for new people to penetrate.
I still don't think they're scammers; but they are fantastically delusional if they think this project will have a wide appeal if they carry on conducting themselves in this way.