Author

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 458. (Read 473126 times)

hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
My goal is becaming a billionaire.

Being duped by GAW then trying keep alive the coin they were duped by days a lot. A lot of people got duped by GAW, just a fraction of those though it was a great idea to keep said coin going. That is incompetent. If they thought that was a good idea I am afraid to see what their ideas for ION are.

I wish you luck with your investment with ION.

what you say is a strength in my opinion. these people did not give up even though they got scammed bad, they tried to pick up the pieces and showed (over a long period of time) that they do not give up easily. in the end the scam xpy was too poor to make a recovery with no control over the coin code. for a few people to recover a whole scam coin to goodness is no easy task to succeed - but they tried.

over this long period of time not a single person claims to be scammed from this team. people who bought into the platform have many sold their investments for a profit already. not a single scam report from this previous platform xpy effort.

to try something which is hard, and to try anyway against all odd is a good quality and one that if carried through to ion project will be a very interesting to see how this devlopes.

if they try as hard with ion as they did before (despite facing such difficulties) then this is a project to watch.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

I never stated they started XPY or Paycoin, I stated they were involved in it which is 100% fact.

Say there was this bank with a horrible track record of misusing customer funds and they closed that bank and started a whole new bank. Would you give them the benefit of the doubt and give them your money?

Again, please state why you think it is an honest operation. Fee free to answer any of the other questions I posed to you as well.

involved can mean two things. as an investor or as a theif?

are you suggesting the ion team were theives or investors? it sounds like you are saying they were theives?

if they were investors, who lost money, then why should this make everyone not trust them? did you never lose money? maybe you are more clever than every other investor. even so, this does not make you deserve trust. if anyone involved in this project lost money before, this means nothing about trust - or scam potential.

if they were theives, then name the theif and the reports of the fraud, scam, stole of monies?

the information you are giving is wrong and makes it difficult to assess, its so much crap you are posting.

i found some of the ion team were investors in xpy/paycoin. what is the crime to be an investor in something that turns out to be a scam?

you also seem to say that "they" have a horrible track record about something, but this part i do not understand.


I am suggesting neither, quit putting words into my mouth. What is being suggested is that they are incompetent. If you are ok with giving your funds to incompetent people, more power to you.  

I don't lose money as I don't do stupid shit with it. I know when something is too good to be true it is. I am not greedy so I am not constantly chasing the next way to make a dollar.

What don't you understand about horrible track record? Duped by GAW then unsuccessfully for a year tried to keeps the XPY failure afloat. I would say that is a pretty bad track record for a group of individuals soliciting funds with no transparency.  If they were transparent, their past wouldn't be that big of an issue. But since they have provided ZERO transparency I can only make a decision based on their past track record.

If everything I am saying is completely wrong and I am just posting crap, PLEASE show me how I am wrong. If you can't then it is you who are wrong. Or are you another one with magic inside information that makes you trust this team.

 WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THIS TEAM AND OPERATION?? I have asked you this three times now and you have given no explanation as to why you think this is an honest, trustworthy operation.

you are not wrong as this is your opinion. it only means seomthing to you.

being "duped by gaw" was thousands of people. this does not make all these people incompetent, it means that got duped.

time will tell if they can make a success of this project. but to call this a scam is wrong, unless you know money is being stolen with the full intention to take it away from the owners and no attempt to deliver anything.

i think they will try to make this a success. i dont know if they will succeed. if they try but fail, its not a scam, its just a fail.

to answer your question about trust, i think it is safer not to trust anyone. not any altcoin launch team and not people like you who have no track record in anything at all.

Being duped by GAW then trying keep alive the coin they were duped by days a lot. A lot of people got duped by GAW, just a fraction of those though it was a great idea to keep said coin going. That is incompetent. If they thought that was a good idea I am afraid to see what their ideas for ION are.

I wish you luck with your investment with ION.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Same discussions going on just like on Hashtalk when XPY was launched.
We went from Hashpoints->Paycoin->ION. Keep it going!  Roll Eyes

Hope none of the operators get caught making artificial coins through elevated stakers or code.
Hope none of the actors get caught making artificial coins through elevated staker keys.

Hey that premine is great as well. Garza would be proud.

This time will be different though because there are purple rockets!

I love how we're now able to dissolve the debts or property of failed coins into others now.
'Cause fuck financial responsibility, amirite?  
I'll have to remember that if I ever want to to exploit some userbase, make a coin from their collective collaboration, and then fail to deliver.
I can just have another operator clean it up. Only take a couple years, then everyone either forgets or doesn't care.

I wish we could do this with student mortgage debts.



hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
My goal is becaming a billionaire.
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

I never stated they started XPY or Paycoin, I stated they were involved in it which is 100% fact.

Say there was this bank with a horrible track record of misusing customer funds and they closed that bank and started a whole new bank. Would you give them the benefit of the doubt and give them your money?

Again, please state why you think it is an honest operation. Fee free to answer any of the other questions I posed to you as well.

involved can mean two things. as an investor or as a theif?

are you suggesting the ion team were theives or investors? it sounds like you are saying they were theives?

if they were investors, who lost money, then why should this make everyone not trust them? did you never lose money? maybe you are more clever than every other investor. even so, this does not make you deserve trust. if anyone involved in this project lost money before, this means nothing about trust - or scam potential.

if they were theives, then name the theif and the reports of the fraud, scam, stole of monies?

the information you are giving is wrong and makes it difficult to assess, its so much crap you are posting.

i found some of the ion team were investors in xpy/paycoin. what is the crime to be an investor in something that turns out to be a scam?

you also seem to say that "they" have a horrible track record about something, but this part i do not understand.


I am suggesting neither, quit putting words into my mouth. What is being suggested is that they are incompetent. If you are ok with giving your funds to incompetent people, more power to you.  

I don't lose money as I don't do stupid shit with it. I know when something is too good to be true it is. I am not greedy so I am not constantly chasing the next way to make a dollar.

What don't you understand about horrible track record? Duped by GAW then unsuccessfully for a year tried to keeps the XPY failure afloat. I would say that is a pretty bad track record for a group of individuals soliciting funds with no transparency.  If they were transparent, their past wouldn't be that big of an issue. But since they have provided ZERO transparency I can only make a decision based on their past track record.

If everything I am saying is completely wrong and I am just posting crap, PLEASE show me how I am wrong. If you can't then it is you who are wrong. Or are you another one with magic inside information that makes you trust this team.

 WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THIS TEAM AND OPERATION?? I have asked you this three times now and you have given no explanation as to why you think this is an honest, trustworthy operation.

you are not wrong as this is your opinion. it only means seomthing to you.

being "duped by gaw" was thousands of people. this does not make all these people incompetent, it means that got duped.

time will tell if they can make a success of this project. but to call this a scam is wrong, unless you know money is being stolen with the full intention to take it away from the owners and no attempt to deliver anything.

i think they will try to make this a success. i dont know if they will succeed. if they try but fail, its not a scam, its just a fail.

to answer your question about trust, i think it is safer not to trust anyone. not any altcoin launch team and not people like you who have no track record in anything at all.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

I never stated they started XPY or Paycoin, I stated they were involved in it which is 100% fact.

Say there was this bank with a horrible track record of misusing customer funds and they closed that bank and started a whole new bank. Would you give them the benefit of the doubt and give them your money?

Again, please state why you think it is an honest operation. Fee free to answer any of the other questions I posed to you as well.

involved can mean two things. as an investor or as a theif?

are you suggesting the ion team were theives or investors? it sounds like you are saying they were theives?

if they were investors, who lost money, then why should this make everyone not trust them? did you never lose money? maybe you are more clever than every other investor. even so, this does not make you deserve trust. if anyone involved in this project lost money before, this means nothing about trust - or scam potential.

if they were theives, then name the theif and the reports of the fraud, scam, stole of monies?

the information you are giving is wrong and makes it difficult to assess, its so much crap you are posting.

i found some of the ion team were investors in xpy/paycoin. what is the crime to be an investor in something that turns out to be a scam?

you also seem to say that "they" have a horrible track record about something, but this part i do not understand.


I am suggesting neither, quit putting words into my mouth. What is being suggested is that they are incompetent. If you are ok with giving your funds to incompetent people, more power to you. 

I don't lose money as I don't do stupid shit with it. I know when something is too good to be true it is. I am not greedy so I am not constantly chasing the next way to make a dollar.

What don't you understand about horrible track record? Duped by GAW then unsuccessfully for a year tried to keeps the XPY failure afloat. I would say that is a pretty bad track record for a group of individuals soliciting funds with no transparency.  If they were transparent, their past wouldn't be that big of an issue. But since they have provided ZERO transparency I can only make a decision based on their past track record.

If everything I am saying is completely wrong and I am just posting crap, PLEASE show me how I am wrong. If you can't then it is you who are wrong. Or are you another one with magic inside information that makes you trust this team.

 WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THIS TEAM AND OPERATION?? I have asked you this three times now and you have given no explanation as to why you think this is an honest, trustworthy operation.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
My goal is becaming a billionaire.
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

I never stated they started XPY or Paycoin, I stated they were involved in it which is 100% fact.

Say there was this bank with a horrible track record of misusing customer funds and they closed that bank and started a whole new bank. Would you give them the benefit of the doubt and give them your money?

Again, please state why you think it is an honest operation. Fee free to answer any of the other questions I posed to you as well.

involved can mean two things. as an investor or as a theif?

are you suggesting the ion team were theives or investors? it sounds like you are saying they were theives?

if they were theives, then name the theifs and the charges (by the law) of the fraud, scam, stole of monies? or are these charges just something you are inventing to support your story? i find no information about any ion team person getting arrested and charged with anything, its just fantasy.

if they were investors, who lost money, then why should this make everyone not trust them? did you never lose money? maybe you are more clever than every other investor. even so, this does not make you deserve trust. if anyone involved in this project lost money before, this means nothing about trust - or scam potential.

the information you are giving is wrong and makes it difficult to assess, its so much crap you are posting.

i found some of the ion team were investors in xpy/paycoin. what is the crime to be an investor in something that turns out to be a scam?

you also seem to say that "they" have a horrible track record about something, but this part i do not understand. from what i can see this is the first altcoin they have ever set up.

to me the effort looks honest. all claims that this is a scam by theives seem to be lies or information twisting from other coins which this team did not initiate.

you nor anyone else has provided any information or evidence to confirm that this team are theives or scammers. yet you still call them this, with no evidence. so you have other motives other than providing useful info.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

I never stated they started XPY or Paycoin, I stated they were involved in it which is 100% fact.

Say there was this bank with a horrible track record of misusing customer funds and they closed that bank and started a whole new bank. Would you give them the benefit of the doubt and give them your money?

Again, please state why you think it is an honest operation. Fee free to answer any of the other questions I posed to you as well.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.

They did not LAUNCH paycoin, but they got scammed by it. They also LAUNCHED xpy.io which was a failure since the price of xpy didn't go up and they ended up taking all the money they took in to start this project.

Again, why do you have any faith in these people when their major qualifications appeared to be getting scammed and/or failing?
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
My goal is becaming a billionaire.
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...

after reading through a lot of crap, i found that this team did not launch XPY or paycoin even though you and others keep saying they did.

you should not trust this altcoin any more than you trust any other altcoin launch. but i see no reason to trust it any less either.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.

Would you please explain why it looks like an honest effort?

The reason nothing dishonest has been discovered or reported is because they REFUSE to answer questions or provide transparency. I have asked half a dozen times where the extra staking power comes from for "electrifying" stakers only to be ignore all 6 times. How all of a sudden do you magically get extra staking power without already having that staking in existence? My conclusion is by putting the pre mine into Masternodes. How is that honest? Same shit as XPY, almost to a T. Did you consider XPY to be an honest operation.

Are we now just supposed to trust people in crypto because they say "just trust us"?. Are we not entitled to ha e questions answered? Especially with the track record of previous operations associated with the team? When they are asking for $500,000 to $1,000,000 of free money?

I really want to know what bring you to the conclusion that this is an honest operation. I want to see some facts. Them being "nice" does not qualify.

Do you also feel that a huge pre-mine with zero transparency is the "honest" way to launch a coin? XPY launched the exact same way...
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
My goal is becaming a billionaire.
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.

nothing dishonest about this project has been discovered or reported. some have branded it a scam and seem to have an active interest in making the label stick, but with no evidence to support. saying something is a scam, does not make it a scam.

to me this looks like an honest effort at a new altcoin launch. the plan is interesting.

as to whether it will succeed is another matter.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
IBM also didn't post on a public forum asking people for handouts.

I'm sure wherever they went to ask for their initial and subsequent investments people asked questions and got answers.

IBM should have registered their business in Singapore.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
Matlocks excuse for radio silence on this forum, paraphrased "if IBM doesn't answer forum posts, why should we?"

I love how he keeps referring to IBM as if it's the paragon of companies. Dude was apparently in a coma for the past 20 years.




Companies do actually.. go checkout whirlpool telstra, tpg and other isp companies have staff that do reply to customer complaints on a public forum.

IBM actually produces technology thats revolutionary. IBM actually has a proven "reputation", they put out financial statements that show their profits, etc o wait ionomy doesn't show where their premine etc is actually going.


IBM also didn't post on a public forum asking people for handouts.

I'm sure wherever they went to ask for their initial and subsequent investments people asked questions and got answers.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

Yea, the associations with gaw and paycoin are total crap.

We completely made up the fact that these people's only qualifications are that they fell for the gaw scam and then spent another year working on xpy and accomplishing nothing. You caught us. Enjoy the millions you are sure to make from these geniuses.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
Matlocks excuse for radio silence on this forum, paraphrased "if IBM doesn't answer forum posts, why should we?"

I love how he keeps referring to IBM as if it's the paragon of companies. Dude was apparently in a coma for the past 20 years.




Companies do actually.. go checkout whirlpool telstra, tpg and other isp companies have staff that do reply to customer complaints on a public forum.

IBM actually produces technology thats revolutionary. IBM actually has a proven "reputation", they put out financial statements that show their profits, etc o wait ionomy doesn't show where their premine etc is actually going.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
after following this thread for a few weeks its plain to see that about 6 people seem to have a real issue with this ion project and have put a lot of effort into trying to associate it with gaw, paycoin, scam etc.

there's a few unanswered questions from the ion team, but apart from that, this thread is just full of crap from these same 6 people.

its a shame because it means the ion team didnt spend much time to answer the questions as the point is, the people asking the questions dont seem to want to know the answers. any answers would be quickly buried with the same crap from the same 6 people.

in my opinion this project looks like an honest effort.

I'd rephrase that opinion to it looks like in your opinion this project looks like an effort. There is no honest. Honest implies transparency and answering of questions they have neither. When they answer questions such as the ones i posted and address the stats i put about potential masternodes then i'll give them more time of day.

There is nothing honest about premining coins making masternodes and trickle selling on the exchanges. You just invented free currency which you don't want that you convert to btc and usd to fill your pockets. You can sugar coat it with lies about increasing the platform but this fact stands.

Inventing free money and premining makes you exactly like the banking system... inventing free fiat when you feel like it.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
Well, only 1 week left for blockchain and wallet.

I wonder which exchange will have ION listed first.

cryptsy or bitebi9 i think
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
In case anyone is interested...

https://www.facebook.com/ionomy/?fref=ts

I like this facebook post the most

Quote from: Ionomy
"Nothing is more expensive than a missed opportunity" On week 4 of ICO with over 1/2 coins distributed! ‪#‎alt‬ ‪#‎crypto‬ ‪#‎btc

I disagree... nothing is more expensive than an opportunity that turns out to be a scam Smiley
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
When I said this forum was like an angel or devil I meant it. It was an angel with XPY but a devil with DMD. cat the beginning but didn't because of all the it's a scam posts.
Right now DMD has a market cap of US$501,487 and a 24 hour trading volume of US$ 285. That means: No one is interested. If you had bought DMD, maybe you could have "made" (i.e. stolen) a little money from someone else stupid enough to buy it - but that does not change the fact that DMD is a failed shitcoin, just like XPY (and soon™ ION).


Stolen
defined as buying DMD from an exchange then eventually selling it back for more than you bought it for.

hmmm....

Didn't know that was stealing.... shit I just realized that I might have mined some too.... is that stealing as well

Definition of "stealing" aside, the fact that you made money trading doesn't do anything to prove whether the coin is a scam or not. Some could have made money with XPY trading too, in fact weren't you the one claiming you reduced your losses that way? (sorry if I mixed you up with someone else - long week).

So again, you're very superficial in how you choose your investments. You're essentially gambling and you're refusing to put more work into improving your odds. If that works for you - great, but you will get laughed at for a good reason.

Your right that wasn't my point. My point was that many people called the coin a scam. When you consider the first block was mined almost 3 years ago if it were a scam I'm pretty sure it would have been exposed by now

About the XPY trading that wasn't me

I don't think I'm a superficial investor but hey if you say I am then I guess I am. I'll be around so as this story unfolds people can laugh away  Grin

You really don't get it, do you? My point was that I think it's idiotic of you to write "I should have invested in DMD", when DMD is just another useless shitcoin with a total marketcap of half a million dollars. You shitcoiners are such a sad bunch of people. All you'd really have to do is buy a few BTC and be patient for 20 years. But no, you think you have to daytrade useless crap like XPY, DMD and ION and sell that useless crap to other idiots. It's ridiculous. Bitcoin is fine. It's secure, it's succesful, it's changing the world. You don't need all that other crap. But you know what, have fun shitcoining, have fun with XPY, ION, DMD and all the other scams and ponzi schemes you fall for. Just don't drag other people into them.


Who said anything about day trading DMD duh it was you

Your such a cock 3 times now you've tried to discredit me, the beauty is all I need to do now is sit back and watch your credibility flush down the toilet.

Cock
Sure, whatever you say, shitcoiner.
Jump to: