Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 52. (Read 473183 times)
September 17, 2018, 10:19:22 AM
I genuinely don’t know if Huey & the team actually really care about the price of Ion as a ‘currency’, to be honest. It’s just a means to an end, I think - the aim being to create an ecosystem in which Ionomy as a platform is a hub for game creators & gamers. The original ICO allowed them to finance their venture without needing to go down the standard startup route of seeking VC seed money, and gave them the extra benefit of not being held accountable for scrutiny to a set of regulated investors - the downside of course being that they’ve done this on their own without the access to knowledge & advice that being in a VC/startup incubator environment brings. Boy, could they have done with that. I’d imagine the plan was to monetize things as their operation scaled, and as more and more players & devs used their ecosystem, move away from the ICO funding and reliance on Ion based funding at all. But thus far things haven’t really scaled at all, and they’ve likely got a shrinking runway of funds left. Hence the second ICO dressed up as a secondary venture & obfuscated behind the guise of a different ‘team’ - Deflation Labs, whose workers are 2/3s of Support Labs, which is a 3re venture owned by... Adam Matlack.
September 16, 2018, 06:02:07 PM
Nice project I'll be waiting for that date it's such a promising project I believe the out come will be nice I would like to invest
September 16, 2018, 05:05:45 PM
How much time do I have to wait for coins? I sent from the website to the stock market wallet. It's been an hour and no coins! 
Not sure haven't used that service in a while... I've been buying my ion from Bitrex
I'm assuming you mean ionomy.com. If you contact them with your details they will be able to help
I bought ION on bittrex and sent to ionomy.com the transaction lasted only 5 minutes. When I sent ION from ionomy.com to bittrex - no coins and no transactions
It's 6 confirmations so the same transaction time of a few minutes max
Your problem has effected a few other people too. Just seen on discord that the hot wallet has run out of ION and is now in the process of refill so expect normal service to be resumed shortly.
If you haven't already join discord as their are people there that can help..... sometimes it's quicker to ask in discord than sending a mail to support
https://discordapp.com/invite/vuZn7gC September 16, 2018, 03:25:52 PM
How much time do I have to wait for coins? I sent from the website to the stock market wallet. It's been an hour and no coins!
Not sure haven't used that service in a while... I've been buying my ion from Bitrex
I'm assuming you mean ionomy.com. If you contact them with your details they will be able to help
I bought ION on bittrex and sent to ionomy.com the transaction lasted only 5 minutes. When I sent ION from ionomy.com to bittrex - no coins and no transactions
September 16, 2018, 03:07:56 PM
In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate
9k sat... 80% drop from the ICO price. What's your threshold for "utter shit"? 90%? 95%?
You also need to factor in 2.5 years of masternode staking. At today's price "Utter shit" would be around 2.5k sat.
My bad I thought after 2.5 years your trolling had evolved
September 16, 2018, 02:40:10 PM
How much time do I have to wait for coins? I sent from the website to the stock market wallet. It's been an hour and no coins!
September 16, 2018, 10:46:31 AM
In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate
9k sat... 80% drop from the ICO price. What's your threshold for "utter shit"? 90%? 95%?
September 16, 2018, 10:07:21 AM
A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.
Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.
In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate
Discussion from a member of the Wild's Depot Research and Development team:
the addition of smart ION Node will utilize the current assets...
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
a path for growth of the ION blockchain instead of going down with the other crypto projects
I have no clue to how giving away half of the available assets will make the other half worth anything
"Honestly, as such said in response, this is stuff people have been saying since the beginning of the project. There’s a million things the Ion team have done wrong, done badly or simply not done at all. Besides all this, the base idea of Ion - a crypto currency based gaming ecosystem - is and always has been a shit idea. It’s just even shitter now we’re in the middle of a massive depression in BTC price because people conflate (rightly or wrongly) all block chain projects with bitcoin and most people won’t be touching them with a barge pole for a long, long time after so many people lost out in the bubble."
September 15, 2018, 09:34:12 AM
wait im confused... wildshark was promoting and going on about increases in usd the last 12 months now he’s saying its crap... was he telling lies?
I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I've been busy writing an ION Improvement proposal to increase the technology on the ION blockchain. The ionomy Ecosystem White Paper is available at https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
If you have been reading my posts, i have been commenting on Huey and the team's effort to create more "worthless" assets (Tokens) in the ionomy ecosystem. The price of ION is falling and will continue to fall until the new ION token wallet is forced upon the ION community.
Everyone voice your opinion.. now is the time for smart ION nodes (Gamernode) to show up in the ionomy Vision... dynamically created ION node using the current ionomy assets. Demand to the illegal ionomy Kangaroo Court a VOTE on this proposal!!!
If Dark Matter is so great, why do they not have their own blockchain to bloat with a massive amount of token transactions
September 15, 2018, 07:11:23 AM
A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.
Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.
In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate
September 15, 2018, 12:22:20 AM
A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.
Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.
wait im confused... wildshark was promoting and going on about increases in usd the last 12 months now he’s saying its crap... was he telling lies?
wildshark make up your mind tell us the truth were you telling lies in the past? why now saying last 12 months was bad now while posts from you in the last 12 months was good... which was it? explain yourself or lose any credibility you had.
September 14, 2018, 02:24:46 PM
A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.
Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.
September 14, 2018, 11:35:31 AM
A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.
September 13, 2018, 10:36:43 AM
This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.
Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either
- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money
Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer
The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC? Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.
Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
Here is a some comments from a member of the Wild's Depot research and development team. The author wants to remain anamious in fear of the illegal ionomy Community Kangaroo Court imposing a ban on their user.
"As far as I can tell, Huey and the ion team are trying to create a second ICO, the reasons for which are a bit unclear; partially at least it seems to be mainly to boost funding for the Ion team, and perhaps partially to try and gain extra traction and interest in the ‘ionomy’. Judging from the fact that almost no one has commented on anything that’s been published about XDM, I’d be inclined to say it isn’t exactly going to be popular.
I don’t know very much but this reeks of them disliking people who don’t agree with Huey’s direction. They’ve always been cult-y and they’ve become even more so as this project has gone on as the active participant list hasn’t really scaled up at all in two and a half years - essentially this is still the same group of ex-XPY, XPY.io holders and refugees. The fact that none of the teams official tweets ever get shared more than 30 or 40 times should be a good indication of how many people are actually engaged with ion as a ‘thing’. Not many. Rumble Arena might bring a few more in, but this isn’t going to take a chunk of the mobile gaming market and likely never will."
September 12, 2018, 05:19:26 PM
Is this the ionomy cult's effort to sell off ION and investing in new ionomy tokens?
No it's probably you selling off your nodes
September 11, 2018, 07:24:32 AM
Quite the opposite.....
At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf
Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!
A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.
Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
Seriously..
... Just like me the only thing you represent is yourself.
The ION community will chill when you produce a revised "ION Improvement White Paper" that documents your poorly prepared IIPs!
Let all the Masternode Owners have a say by voting on this proposal to implement dynamic creation of smart ION Nodes using current ionomy assets in any ION WALLET functionality on the ION BLOCKCHAIN! Add incentive to "HOLD" ionomy assets!
September 11, 2018, 06:48:36 AM
Quite the opposite.....
At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf
Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!
A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.
Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
Seriously..
As you were banned from discord you missed out on all the discussion. During the consultation period everyone had the opportunity to comment irrelevant of how many ion/nodes they owned, consensus was achieved with some changes made to some of the proposals..... you never saw any of this.
Don't try and position yourself as a spokesperson for the ION community because your not. Just like me the only thing you represent is yourself.
September 11, 2018, 05:41:30 AM
Quite the opposite.....
At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf
Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!
A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.
Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
September 10, 2018, 02:19:41 PM
This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.
Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either
- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money
Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer
The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC? Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.
Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility
Quite the opposite.....
At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf
Most of June and some of July was spent in discussion. The community doesn't live here, it can be found on discord https://discordapp.com/invite/vuZn7gC & telegram https://t.me/joinchat/F-MxeUP480C--PaXCgVupw. Feel free to pop over and verify
September 10, 2018, 11:08:38 AM
Ahh another long term troll reappears selling the Pre mine something you were harping on about 2.5 years ago. If that was the company's intent or exit plan don't you think they would have done it already especially when you consider ion in Jan almost hit $3.00
selling the Pre mine something you were harping on about 2.5 years ago. If that was the company's intent or exit plan don't you think they would have done it already especially when you consider ion in Jan almost hit $3.00 Right, they're sitting on a huge premine AND creating millions of new coins just so that they could continue to not sell them
As long as you morons keep giving them money without requiring transparency or accountability they have no reason to "exit". They can just slowly dump those IONs and keep issuing new bullshit tokens.
Jump to: