Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 47. (Read 473123 times)

hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
2 plan/project way below average with little hope for recovery.[/b]

Ionomy LTD has been behind in the cyrpto land for over a year now. Ionomy's goal to make something work and then present it to the community is lame!
Like me all you speak for is yourself. You definitely do not represent the community. The community live on discord which is a place you were banned from months ago so to position yourself as a community spokesperson is ridiculous.

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...
Well done for stating the obvious  Grin  got any examples we can debate ?

hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  

Let's recap... are you promoting or not the next wallet Huh
It looks like your trying to sell a product you have no idea what it contains because someone mentioned it in a chat room.  Roll Eyes If info was from the wallet DEV, I wish he had posted the information in this ION thread to gain credit-ability with new investors... Expand the ionomy Vision

and the funny thing is the new wallet won't contain any of functionality voted on by the ION community. Seems a little fishy Huh

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...

I'm just using the HTML wallet status to focus on the point I made about the dangers of hyping stuff that doesn't exist or isn't finished..... something that seems to happen a lot in the land of crypto. Smiley
  
I am glad to see that you have identified defects that happen a lot in the land of crypto. How does that relate to promoting an ION wallet that you are now SHILLING Huh

Why are the ION Core Team IIP not included in this new wallet? What new functionality are included that makes proposed wallet better than QT wallet Huh

Shilling??? you'll need to explain that one I don't understand.

Maybe it wasn't part of the proposal because it was something they were already working on.... developing a wallet that would meet their future requirements

In terms of functionality like everyone else you'll have to wait and see
I'd go with comparing the ionomy project to other successful crypto projects that have good solid plan that contains many milestones. The community currently rates the ION plan/project way below average with little hope for recovery.

Ionomy LTD has been behind in the cyrpto land for over a year now. Ionomy's goal to make something work and then present it to the community is lame!

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  

Let's recap... are you promoting or not the next wallet Huh
It looks like your trying to sell a product you have no idea what it contains because someone mentioned it in a chat room.  Roll Eyes If info was from the wallet DEV, I wish he had posted the information in this ION thread to gain credit-ability with new investors... Expand the ionomy Vision

and the funny thing is the new wallet won't contain any of functionality voted on by the ION community. Seems a little fishy Huh

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...

I'm just using the HTML wallet status to focus on the point I made about the dangers of hyping stuff that doesn't exist or isn't finished..... something that seems to happen a lot in the land of crypto. Smiley
  
I am glad to see that you have identified defects that happen a lot in the land of crypto. How does that relate to promoting an ION wallet that you are now SHILLING Huh

Why are the ION Core Team IIP not included in this new wallet? What new functionality are included that makes proposed wallet better than QT wallet Huh

Shilling??? you'll need to explain that one I don't understand.

Maybe it wasn't part of the proposal because it was something they were already working on.... developing a wallet that would meet their future requirements

In terms of functionality like everyone else you'll have to wait and see
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  

Let's recap... are you promoting or not the next wallet Huh
It looks like your trying to sell a product you have no idea what it contains because someone mentioned it in a chat room.  Roll Eyes If info was from the wallet DEV, I wish he had posted the information in this ION thread to gain credit-ability with new investors... Expand the ionomy Vision

and the funny thing is the new wallet won't contain any of functionality voted on by the ION community. Seems a little fishy Huh

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...

I'm just using the HTML wallet status to focus on the point I made about the dangers of hyping stuff that doesn't exist or isn't finished..... something that seems to happen a lot in the land of crypto. Smiley
  
I am glad to see that you have identified defects that happen a lot in the land of crypto. How does that relate to promoting an ION wallet that you are now SHILLING Huh

Why are the ION Core Team IIP not included in this new wallet? What new functionality are included that makes proposed wallet better than QT wallet Huh
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  

Let's recap... are you promoting or not the next wallet Huh
It looks like your trying to sell a product you have no idea what it contains because someone mentioned it in a chat room.  Roll Eyes If info was from the wallet DEV, I wish he had posted the information in this ION thread to gain credit-ability with new investors... Expand the ionomy Vision

and the funny thing is the new wallet won't contain any of functionality voted on by the ION community. Seems a little fishy Huh

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...

I'm just using the HTML wallet status to focus on the point I made about the dangers of hyping stuff that doesn't exist or isn't finished..... something that seems to happen a lot in the land of crypto. Smiley
 
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  

Let's recap... are you promoting or not the next wallet Huh
It looks like your trying to sell a product you have no idea what it contains because someone mentioned it in a chat room.  Roll Eyes If info was from the wallet DEV, I wish he had posted the information in this ION thread to gain credit-ability with new investors... Expand the ionomy Vision

and the funny thing is the new wallet won't contain any of functionality voted on by the ION community. Seems a little fishy Huh

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project...
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583




This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?

What I posted was something published in general discord giving everyone a quick update on the HTML5 wallet. I would save the hype until it's passed testing and then launched. The fact that it's running on the mainnet is a pretty big step forwards.  Hyping stuff when it's not ready just sets you up for a fall.

The wallet is not part of the ION Core Team's IIPs although it does looks to be an important element in IIP implementation.

No change in the block reward schedule  Smiley

I'm just as eager as you to see stuff happen but it needs to be done right.  
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500




This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

Is it too much to hype what new functionality will available over the good old QT? Which one of the ION Core Team's IIPs are included with this release?

ION Core Team IIPs Referenced
IIP_0001 - IIP Purpose and Guidelines
IIP_0002 - Secondary tokens
IIP_0003 - Revised block reward schedule
IIP_0004 - Timelock-based block reward distribution
IIP_0005 - Masternode collateral halving

Has there been a change in the ION block reward schedule?
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Your so right unlike the rest of the Crypto ION is down  Sad


I think that you should do a yearly analysis, started and ended day of same month/ week within the period.
For example, price from October of 2017 to October of 2018, etc.
It will make more sense.

I could do but as the troll spent all of 5 mins posting me taking more than 30 mins to formulate a response would be a total waste of my time.

The data is 2018 YTD. Whichever way you slice it those looking for a quick return in 2018 this has been a bad year. Me I think  this is a fact of life as many crypto projects announced were total non starters, scams, ICO's based on intent that failed to meet their expectations or just poorly managed.

About intent............



This is a screenshot of the new HTML5 wallet that will replace QT running on mainnet. The wallet is going thorough the final stages of testing having taken months to develop. Ionomy is 3 years old now spending their funds on develpoment not hype. Basing a business on Hype is a dangerous game to play when you hype stuff that doesn't exist which is something many ico's did.

BTW. This is where I got the table from https://seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4210357-bitcoin-faint-hearted-even-seems-hated forgot to post the link
member
Activity: 156
Merit: 15
Your so right unlike the rest of the Crypto ION is down  Sad


I think that you should do a yearly analysis, started and ended day of same month/ week within the period.
For example, price from October of 2017 to October of 2018, etc.
It will make more sense.
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Your so right unlike the rest of the Crypto ION is down  Sad

ION is down relative to "the rest of the Crypto". I don't expect you to understand that but to anyone with an actual brain (you know, people who still hold Bitcoins they didn't donate to Garza and to Matlack) it looks quite pathetic to drop 80% off the ICO price and 90% off ATH.


Whose the one with no brain ?

The one with 912 days of masternode rewards

or

The one who has been trolling here for 2.5 years with F**k all to show for it Grin

Garza was a mistake big deal who cares he's going to Jail. He's just one of my many mistakes since my first bitcoin transaction way back in 2013.

Matlack on the other hand was one of my better investments on track to be on par with my bitcoin stuff Grin.


hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
Quote
Comment from member of Wild's Depot research and development team on Ionomy project:

"I’ve said it before, I’ll probably say it again - this team are not good enough at marketing to make this product work, even if it was compelling enough to attract large numbers of people (which it isn’t). They’ve launched an incredibly niche product into an already struggling market, with very little in the way of advertising other than the usual insipid tweets. It looks flash and new and I’m sure it works wonderfully but this will always be a platform with very little appeal to those outside of the tiny niche of people who already use it.
Once again, swing and a miss."

Once again tell your friend that the ICO money ionomy generated has been spent on development. For instance the HTML5 wallet doesn't take a week to develop it takes months and guess what it costs money...... the new platform again takes months to develop and again guess what it costs money too....... the list goes on. As of now I would say that Ionomy is 60% there in terms of offering the market beyond crypto a compelling option

What I don't see (in the public eye) is any growth of investors in the project beyond the current ionomy cult. Crying about not have money to finance a decaying plan that is being designed from a bottom-up implementation that is known to cost more for the life cycle of the ION project. There are many critical pieces to a successful project than rapid deployment of coding without proper design, testing and documentation. Have you spent any money on the ION White Paper that documents the impact/usage to the ION coin and ionomy ecosystem?

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project... and usually leads to justification for additional funding for project vision

What you don't see is the growth of number of masternode or investors in the ecosystem. With the release of Ionomy LTD stakers, where are the increase in masternodes with the addition of Ionomy LTD sharenodes?  What happen to the ION Core Team's proposal to double the number of masternodes by changing the amount of a masternode asset to 10K coins? There is no growth being shown in ionomy ecosystem...

Where is ION White Paper(Ver. 3.0) Huh
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Your so right unlike the rest of the Crypto ION is down  Sad

ION is down relative to "the rest of the Crypto". I don't expect you to understand that but to anyone with an actual brain (you know, people who still hold Bitcoins they didn't donate to Garza and to Matlack) it looks quite pathetic to drop 80% off the ICO price and 90% off ATH.
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Fucking hell, I just looked away for a few days and it's down to 8k sat despite korvas harping about all those great things happening.

So either korvas is full of shit or the market is completely stupid in overlooking such a great coin. Seeing how TMOB has 12 players and Offroad Heat has 3 players (those car stickers working out beautifully I see) I'm gonna go with korvas being full of shit.





Your so right unlike the rest of the Crypto ION is down  Sad



If people want to see rubbish they should read your posts on this thread from May 2016 onwards...


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.740

The good old days when I actually thought you were open to adult debate  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Fucking hell, I just looked away for a few days and it's down to 8k sat despite korvas harping about all those great things happening.

So either korvas is full of shit or the market is completely stupid in overlooking such a great coin. Seeing how TMOB has 12 players and Offroad Heat has 3 players (those car stickers working out beautifully I see) I'm gonna go with korvas being full of shit.

Loading...
Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Within the last three days, ION has shown early strong signals that the coin has been on the way to come back.
Daily volume and the price of ION have raised dramatically.
Let's wait patiently, hold your coins tightly, and see what will happen next with ION next several weeks
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
I included ION in my list of the best gaming cryptos https://cryptorials.io/10-of-the-best-gaming-cryptos-to-buy-as-an-investment/

Just seen your list.... a good selection ..... your now on my push notifications list  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 690
Merit: 505
Cryptorials.io
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
Quote
Comment from member of Wild's Depot research and development team on Ionomy project:

"I’ve said it before, I’ll probably say it again - this team are not good enough at marketing to make this product work, even if it was compelling enough to attract large numbers of people (which it isn’t). They’ve launched an incredibly niche product into an already struggling market, with very little in the way of advertising other than the usual insipid tweets. It looks flash and new and I’m sure it works wonderfully but this will always be a platform with very little appeal to those outside of the tiny niche of people who already use it.
Once again, swing and a miss."

Once again tell your friend that the ICO money ionomy generated has been spent on development. For instance the HTML5 wallet doesn't take a week to develop it takes months and guess what it costs money...... the new platform again takes months to develop and again guess what it costs money too....... the list goes on. As of now I would say that Ionomy is 60% there in terms of offering the market beyond crypto a compelling option

What I don't see (in the public eye) is any growth of investors in the project beyond the current ionomy cult. Crying about not have money to finance a decaying plan that is being designed from a bottom-up implementation that is known to cost more for the life cycle of the ION project. There are many critical pieces to a successful project than rapid deployment of coding without proper design, testing and documentation. Have you spent any money on the ION White Paper that documents the impact/usage to the ION coin and ionomy ecosystem?

Hitting established Milestones on time with good product content shows healthy project... and usually leads to justification for additional funding for project vision
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
Quote
Comment from member of Wild's Depot research and development team on Ionomy project:

"I’ve said it before, I’ll probably say it again - this team are not good enough at marketing to make this product work, even if it was compelling enough to attract large numbers of people (which it isn’t). They’ve launched an incredibly niche product into an already struggling market, with very little in the way of advertising other than the usual insipid tweets. It looks flash and new and I’m sure it works wonderfully but this will always be a platform with very little appeal to those outside of the tiny niche of people who already use it.
Once again, swing and a miss."

Once again tell your friend that the ICO money ionomy generated has been spent on development. For instance the HTML5 wallet doesn't take a week to develop it takes months and guess what it costs money...... the new platform again takes months to develop and again guess what it costs money too....... the list goes on. As of now I would say that Ionomy is 60% there in terms of offering the market beyond crypto a compelling option

Using your analogy.... Ionomy have yet to take a swing  Grin spending money now would be selling futures which I think you would agree there has been way to much of that already in crypto. Sell substance not intent  Grin That's what they are about. If your friend can't see that then they need to stop moaning and move onto something else.
Pages:
Jump to: