[ANN] Iridium (IRD) - People are Power - Community build crypto - page 16.

b95123

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10

Quote from: nanona on May 04, 2018, 11:02:07 AM

Quote from: wudafuxup on May 03, 2018, 10:25:00 PM

Yea someobody is clearly trying to keep the price low (which isn't half bad imo) to accumulate more coins. With the rapid coin emission of the first year it is quite normal to see the price drop specially with such a short time in an exchange. People who are hodling now are going to be the real winners in a few months time. The current price is insanely low for the nethash required to mine the coin now that the POW is GPU/CPU only. With the cheap ASIC/Nicehash hashrates gone I expect this to slowly pick up some traction along with more miners.

Well said. However it is profitable to mine it now, unless you have insanely high electricity rates.

I'm not sure. I think that better option is mining ETH now. Sell it and buy IRD. This is a great time to accumulate IRD. It gives much more IRD.

nanona

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

Quote from: wudafuxup on May 03, 2018, 10:25:00 PM

Yea someobody is clearly trying to keep the price low (which isn't half bad imo) to accumulate more coins. With the rapid coin emission of the first year it is quite normal to see the price drop specially with such a short time in an exchange. People who are hodling now are going to be the real winners in a few months time. The current price is insanely low for the nethash required to mine the coin now that the POW is GPU/CPU only. With the cheap ASIC/Nicehash hashrates gone I expect this to slowly pick up some traction along with more miners.

Well said. However it is profitable to mine it now, unless you have insanely high electricity rates.

wudafuxup

full member

Activity: 391

Merit: 105

Quote from: nanona on May 03, 2018, 05:26:44 AM

Quote from: stevebrush on May 03, 2018, 04:49:44 AM

There is something I can not understand : each time the price increase a little, for example, we were around 140 sat, someone sell very small amounts even under the buying offer : now 127 on Tradeogre while lower buying offer is 130 and 111 on crex24. This reflect not the "real price" because there is no averaging and keep IRD low.

As I'm not a trader, neither a miner, what is the point ? is this guy really mentalt retarderet or there is a strategy ?

Someone accumulating cheap coins before the moonshot first stage liftoff to $0.50 (basically LEO, Low Earth Orbit).

Yea someobody is clearly trying to keep the price low (which isn't half bad imo) to accumulate more coins. With the rapid coin emission of the first year it is quite normal to see the price drop specially with such a short time in an exchange. People who are hodling now are going to be the real winners in a few months time. The current price is insanely low for the nethash required to mine the coin now that the POW is GPU/CPU only. With the cheap ASIC/Nicehash hashrates gone I expect this to slowly pick up some traction along with more miners.

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

##############################################

The new Iridium network and
blockchain explorer is online !

Totally rewritten from scratch in bootstrap 4.1/jquery 3.3.1
- start of work based on the forknote explorer
- Queries are now direct to nodes
- Auto refresh every parts
Home page :
- Network global hashrate is now based on the current mined block (next difficulty).
- Average global hashrate on the last 31 blocks
- Some informations about the supply status
- Search for a block hash/number, a tx hash is available the home page too
- List transactions in mempool (tx that are waiting a block)
- Last 10 blocks found
Blockchain
- Network global infos on top
- Search for a block hash/number, a tx hash
- Last 31 blocks and more
Pools
- Network global infos on top
- pool stats and status
- Overall stats and pending blocks

https://explorer.ird.cash

#################################################

nanona

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

Quote from: stevebrush on May 03, 2018, 04:49:44 AM

There is something I can not understand : each time the price increase a little, for example, we were around 140 sat, someone sell very small amounts even under the buying offer : now 127 on Tradeogre while lower buying offer is 130 and 111 on crex24. This reflect not the "real price" because there is no averaging and keep IRD low.

As I'm not a trader, neither a miner, what is the point ? is this guy really mentalt retarderet or there is a strategy ?

Someone accumulating cheap coins before the moonshot first stage liftoff to $0.50 (basically LEO, Low Earth Orbit).

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Zawy graph before HF/After HF

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

There is something I can not understand : each time the price increase a little, for example, we were around 140 sat, someone sell very small amounts even under the buying offer : now 127 on Tradeogre while lower buying offer is 130 and 111 on crex24. This reflect not the "real price" because there is no averaging and keep IRD low.

As I'm not a trader, neither a miner, what is the point ? is this guy really mentalt retarderet or there is a strategy ?

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: hsbobo on May 02, 2018, 03:06:02 PM

Hi folks,
I am currently not able to get my GPUs to mine again Sad

What I have tried so far:

Code:

tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptonight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptonight-lite -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptolight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight --algo monero -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight --algo cryptonight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
LesPristy/ccminer-cryptonight-light -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
iridiumdev/iridium-gpu-miner -> GPU #0: FATAL: failed to allocate device memory for long state

All build from src with cuda-8.0 on Ubuntu.
Got myself banned from several pools in the meantime (facepalm)...
What am I doing wrong? Or more important: What miners are there which have support for the new cryptonight lite v7 algo?
Any help appreciated & cheers,
bob

xmrig, xmr-stak latests versions support cryptonight lite v7 (also called variant 1). tested by miners. you can find the configs and cmd line on discord, channel mining.
For testing : there is also a pool test : https://test.irdpool.fr : ban time is set to 30 seconds.

hsbobo

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Hi folks,

I am currently not able to get my GPUs to mine again Sad

What I have tried so far:

Code:

tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptonight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptonight-lite -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
tpruvot/ccminer --algo cryptolight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight --algo monero -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight --algo cryptonight -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
LesPristy/ccminer-cryptonight-light -> reject reason: Low difficulty share
iridiumdev/iridium-gpu-miner -> GPU #0: FATAL: failed to allocate device memory for long state

All build from src with cuda-8.0 on Ubuntu.

Got myself banned from several pools in the meantime (facepalm)...

What am I doing wrong? Or more important: What miners are there which have support for the new cryptonight lite v7 algo?

Any help appreciated & cheers,
bob

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 11:45:42 AM

20kh/s or 200kh/s?
I've seen it only around 200 and we are stable at 350 now.
And one question: Are the mining revenue calculators in the pool software correct now or do they need a fix?
EDIT: Latest News on https://explorer.ird.cash/ is outdated now.
EDIT: Iridium was after 15 blocks with the difficulty from slight ASIC level at 270M (only few ASICs mined it) down to CPU/GPU level at 60M at nominal block time. Masari is after very slow 25 blocks with the difficulty still only down to 2G from 9G when it forked and it has to drop much more since block times are still far away from the nominal one. Masari had clearly a few hundred ASICs dominating its chain, but still why does the adjustment go slower? Do you happen to know the difference in the Iridium and Masari DAAs?

It start at 20kh/s ! I was a little affraid as bbscoin wait for 17h for their first mined bloc... and it take 60 blocks to reflect the exact mining HR.

Profit calculator take global hashrate vs pool hashrate / miner hashrate * block reward, so it should be correct.

For the block explorer, I'm working on a new version there : https://explorer.beta.ird.cash where we can see tx pool and the current mined block difficulty, more accurate as we can see the "next" block diff. it's not finished yet but principal function works, so I left the current aside.

For Masari, I don't really know what they have implemented since december. I followed Zawy's works and listen to him about adjustments since v2.

Our v4 diff is the latest LWMA version and limits are now fixed by the FTL 'future time block' and the MTP (BTC acronym, don't know but for us, it's the blockchain timestamp check window.) that's why the rise and fall of the diff is more speed. the V3 versions had limits a little too stricts despite a very nice performance that protect us very well (I think you saw zawy's graphs). It's a perpetual research of perfection

nanona

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

20kh/s or 200kh/s?

I've seen it only around 200 and we are stable at 350 now.

And one question: Are the mining revenue calculators in the pool software correct now or do they need a fix?

EDIT: Latest News on https://explorer.ird.cash/ is outdated now.

EDIT: Iridium was after 15 blocks with the difficulty from slight ASIC level at 270M (only few ASICs mined it) down to CPU/GPU level at 60M at nominal block time. Masari is after very slow 25 blocks with the difficulty still only down to 2G from 9G when it forked and it has to drop much more since block times are still far away from the nominal one. Masari had clearly a few hundred ASICs dominating its chain, but still why does the adjustment go slower? Do you happen to know the difference in the Iridium and Masari DAAs?

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

###############################################

Hard Fork Summary :

We are now at block 115340 and the Iridium network is running smooth.
The first block after changing POW was mined in "only" 1 hour and 20 minutes despite the expected big hashrate drop.
The drop was from 1.6Mh/s to 20kh/s and in 60 blocks, the difficulty was reflecting the exact real hashrate :
big up to the latest version of LWMA from Zawy.

We are now asic proof due to the cryptonight lite v7 POW and we kick out this MH fantom (witch still mining in V3 at this time Grin

).
We also are nicehash proof (they did not implemented cn lite v7 algo yet)
minimum mixin is 2 now (3 in the real transaction) and this is mandatory : your privacy level is increased.

Now, exchange price is our choice, not asics !

All 12 seed nodes stay straight in sync before and after HF, also the prepared pools : they get blocks and send payments without a single drop.
Only 1 pools stay behind : irdpool.tk as usual and 1 pool crash at block 115202 : irdpool.ru

Crex24 switch or has already switch at this time, we talk them a few hours ago.
Tradeogre still experiencing ddos but is up to date
No news yet from altex.exchange but we contact them.

In any case : all v3 blocks are now rejected, also the containing transactions
so don't mine at irdpool.tk, you will lost everything mined there since HF.

Iridium is now running the version 4 ! and yes, we can say loud and clear :

THIS IS A HUDGE SUCCESS !

Thank you every miners for switching you software to the right algo,
Thank you pools dev for following the movement
and thank you @Aiwe (KRB), @Ran (BBSCoin), @Takezo (Rto), @Jagerman (Graft) (security fix),
@Zawy of course and every coin dev on Zawy's channel where we had or follow many discussions
about the choice algo, the security patchs to implements and also following others hard fork...

###############################################

hsbobo

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

A new exchange is started: QUANTA. Help bring awareness to their exchange and let them know you would like Iridium(IRD) to be listed by following these rules:
1. Follow @QuantaDex
2. Create a QUANTA account here quantadex.com
3. Vote for IRD here: http://quantadex.com/vote/439/iridium

people are power, cheers!

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

I made a snapshop of the blockchain around block ~115207 in case of someone need it.
it is available here :
http://test.irdpool.fr/iridiumDB.tar.bz2

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:59:50 AM

EDIT: Did you monitor the mempool and the new blocks regarding any missing transactions? I see on explorer.ird.cash that the very first HF block, 115201, has a (non-coinbase) tx inside. So I hope all the mempool made it onto the new chain.

I did, I made testnet tests for both cli wallet and wallet for V4 and it was ok
(edit) I tried to send a tx and now it's at 3 confirmations.

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:59:50 AM

Quote from: stevebrush on May 01, 2018, 01:46:54 AM

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:33:54 AM

Quote from: stevebrush on May 01, 2018, 01:30:42 AM

Block 115201 is now mined ! HF is done and successfully. next diff : 126189857 (~700k) the diff will drop down quickly now.
@manona : for the linux wallet, it's strange, I have good reports from mint 18.3 and ubuntu 18.04 lts. are you in 32 bits ?

64bit
All my coin VMs run fresh 16.04 LTS (with all the latest patches) but without any other crap installed.

I will look at this a little later Wink

I'm currently heavily monitoring nodes. block 115203 found !

Take your time. No urgency at all. I don't plan to sell my coins anytime soon, so I don't need a wallet actually Grin

EDIT: Oh, and congrats on the successful POW-change HF!

Thanks ! and now minimum mixin is mandatory too : more privacy.

nanona

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

Quote from: stevebrush on May 01, 2018, 01:46:54 AM

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:33:54 AM

Quote from: stevebrush on May 01, 2018, 01:30:42 AM

Block 115201 is now mined ! HF is done and successfully. next diff : 126189857 (~700k) the diff will drop down quickly now.
@manona : for the linux wallet, it's strange, I have good reports from mint 18.3 and ubuntu 18.04 lts. are you in 32 bits ?

64bit
All my coin VMs run fresh 16.04 LTS (with all the latest patches) but without any other crap installed.

I will look at this a little later Wink

I'm currently heavily monitoring nodes. block 115203 found !

Take your time. No urgency at all. I don't plan to sell my coins anytime soon, so I don't need a wallet actually Grin

EDIT: Oh, and congrats on the successful POW-change HF!

EDIT: Did you monitor the mempool and the new blocks regarding any missing transactions? I see on explorer.ird.cash that the very first HF block, 115201, has a (non-coinbase) tx inside. So I hope all the mempool made it onto the new chain.

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:46:18 AM

BTW, tried yesterday to mine on the test pool with the latest Claymore 11.3 but it seems that Claymore can not do the algo used in Iridium.
You set the pow7 flag to 1 and the lite flag to 1 and he will apparently still mine the old lite algo. I guess only the normal V7 algo is implemented, the one used by Monero.
Setting the pow7 flag to 1 and lite flag to 0 however resulted in rejected shares as well, as expected.

Yes, Claymore does not support (yet) cn lite V7, while cn v7 is. I post a request.

stevebrush

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 11

Iridium (IRD) dev

Quote from: nanona on May 01, 2018, 01:33:54 AM

Quote from: stevebrush on May 01, 2018, 01:30:42 AM

Block 115201 is now mined ! HF is done and successfully. next diff : 126189857 (~700k) the diff will drop down quickly now.
@manona : for the linux wallet, it's strange, I have good reports from mint 18.3 and ubuntu 18.04 lts. are you in 32 bits ?

64bit
All my coin VMs run fresh 16.04 LTS (with all the latest patches) but without any other crap installed.

I will look at this a little later Wink

I'm currently heavily monitoring nodes. block 115203 found !

nanona

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

BTW, tried yesterday to mine on the test pool with the latest Claymore 11.3 but it seems that Claymore can not do the algo used in Iridium.
You set the pow7 flag to 1 and the lite flag to 1 and he will apparently still mine the old lite algo. I guess only the normal V7 algo is implemented, the one used by Monero.
Setting the pow7 flag to 1 and the lite flag to 0 however resulted in rejected shares as well, as expected.

Topic: [ANN] Iridium (IRD) - People are Power - Community build crypto - page 16. (Read 149779 times)