[ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update - page 103.

cryptowest

sr. member

Activity: 437

Merit: 250

Quote from: TheNewsHasCome on July 24, 2014, 09:42:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:38:52 PM

website launch in 1 hr 35min

The countdown tells me a little over 7 hours. Am I missing something?

It seems to be dependent on the persons timezone. AFAIK website is being worked on now with a target release early morning (night) US time like 2 AM or something.

7 hours sounds closer.

patience

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:48:35 PM

Quote from: TheNewsHasCome on July 24, 2014, 09:42:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:38:52 PM

website launch in 1 hr 35min

The countdown tells me a little over 7 hours. Am I missing something?

don't know what your looking at but says 1 hr 24min now

Mine says 6hr 12min

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: TheNewsHasCome on July 24, 2014, 09:42:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:38:52 PM

website launch in 1 hr 35min

The countdown tells me a little over 7 hours. Am I missing something?

don't know what your looking at but says 1 hr 24min now

TheNewsHasCome

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:38:52 PM

website launch in 1 hr 35min

The countdown tells me a little over 7 hours. Am I missing something?

blackbird307

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Some good suggestions have come forward about what to implement next into the coin, I wonder what the developer is working on now.

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

website launch in 1 hr 35min

Bitcoin Machine

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: Petr1fied on July 24, 2014, 09:09:20 PM

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:59:04 PM

Quote from: child_harold on July 24, 2014, 08:55:57 PM

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:48:02 PM

KEY Get XC1.5 Source Anonymous Outdated , XC 2.5 Source

FUD. Ignored.

NO .DVE got an anonymous source told XC, xc 1.5 anonymous open source .2.5 not source

Perhaps read previous dev responses to the XC source question?

Quote from: keycoin on July 24, 2014, 01:12:30 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on July 24, 2014, 12:15:54 AM

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

No, not at all. We are close with members of various anon dev teams, and started with XC's released code as a base. The workings are more similar to DRK system. We mentioned this to be respectful and follow the proper traditions of open source. The client part of XC is opensource but the server code isn't, therefore it's not something to be easily copied. The new server code that runs on the nodes is custom and has been proven secure, and the client side code is heavily modified also.

This is whats good about crypto and open source, start with the ideas and work of others, and build on it.

In the future, we may consider having every wallet function as a node. For now, we prefer the simplicity of having masternodes, so we can continue with the rest of our project.

It's not a clone.

TheNewsHasCome

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitcoinwonders010 on July 24, 2014, 09:34:23 PM

fact is this, BTCD went too 250k on promise, crypt when too 300k on promise. we have already implemented, no premine, instamine or scammy crap. we have fewer coins than the both of them. current price too cheap, we haven't been put on other exchanges which will give it a further push, do what you wish, fud will only get bigger as we rise. 500k-900k sats

This, plus the even higher value of devs that deliver their promises in an extremely timely manner. That's worth more in itself than most people give credit.

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

fact is this, BTCD went too 250k on promise, crypt when too 300k on promise. we have already implemented, no premine, instamine or scammy crap. we have fewer coins than the both of them. current price too cheap, we haven't been put on other exchanges which will give it a further push, do what you wish, fud will only get bigger as we rise. 500k-900k sats

1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

You know a coin is good when the FUDders come out of the woodwork. This coin looks good!

guanchayuan

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: child_harold on July 24, 2014, 09:07:33 PM

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:59:04 PM

Quote from: child_harold on July 24, 2014, 08:55:57 PM

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:48:02 PM

KEY Get XC1.5 Source Anonymous Outdated , XC 2.5 Source

FUD. Ignored.

NO .DVE got an anonymous source told XC, xc 1.5 anonymous open source .2.5 not source

FUD. Dev stated code was original.

LOL

Petr1fied

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 502

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:59:04 PM

Quote from: child_harold on July 24, 2014, 08:55:57 PM

Quote from: guanchayuan on July 24, 2014, 08:48:02 PM

KEY Get XC1.5 Source Anonymous Outdated , XC 2.5 Source

FUD. Ignored.

NO .DVE got an anonymous source told XC, xc 1.5 anonymous open source .2.5 not source

Perhaps read previous dev responses to the XC source question?

Quote from: keycoin on July 24, 2014, 01:12:30 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on July 24, 2014, 12:15:54 AM

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

No, not at all. We are close with members of various anon dev teams, and started with XC's released code as a base. The workings are more similar to DRK system. We mentioned this to be respectful and follow the proper traditions of open source. The client part of XC is opensource but the server code isn't, therefore it's not something to be easily copied. The new server code that runs on the nodes is custom and has been proven secure, and the client side code is heavily modified also.

This is whats good about crypto and open source, start with the ideas and work of others, and build on it.

In the future, we may consider having every wallet function as a node. For now, we prefer the simplicity of having masternodes, so we can continue with the rest of our project.

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000