Author

Topic: [ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update - page 108. (Read 188852 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
http://i.imgur.com/FxRgKHE.jpg
You know you wish you had a physical one.

I stayed up late, hope you likes.

~KreenDurron
 ;)KeyCoin Kudo's Welcome: KQ4AjQzYjVpLDvsPaZx2VptsoDn6MtAMRG

Awesome work sir. Have some Key for your coin. Smiley

See what I did there?

Oh man.. I want this.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
nice job guys. Getting in now a bit. This looks promising amongst the sludge of fecal waste released daily. Glad to see a committed dev as well. Cheers to the keycoin community.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
http://i.imgur.com/FxRgKHE.jpg
You know you wish you had a physical one.

I stayed up late, hope you likes.

~KreenDurron
 ;)KeyCoin Kudo's Welcome: KQ4AjQzYjVpLDvsPaZx2VptsoDn6MtAMRG

Awesome work sir. Have some Key for your coin. Smiley

See what I did there?
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 100
So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

No, not at all. We are close with members of various anon dev teams, and started with XC's released code as a base. The workings are more similar to DRK system.  We mentioned this to be respectful and follow the proper traditions of open source. The client part of XC is opensource but the server code isn't, therefore it's not something to be easily copied. The new server code that runs on the nodes is custom and has been proven secure, and the client side code is heavily modified also.

This is whats good about crypto and open source, start with the ideas and work of others, and build on it.

In the future, we may consider having every wallet function as a node. For now, we prefer the simplicity of having masternodes, so we can continue with the rest of our project.





Thanks for the clarification.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Cool! Always nice to see new designs man. It's like car porn..but for crypto. Nice work!


You know you wish you had a physical one.

I stayed up late, hope you likes.

~KreenDurron
 ;)KeyCoin Kudo's Welcome: KQ4AjQzYjVpLDvsPaZx2VptsoDn6MtAMRG
full member
Activity: 426
Merit: 100
Well Annon testing definatly peaking my interest

blockchain doesn't even see the correct amount of coins in my senders wallet anymore either ... Very interesting indeed

newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
http://i.imgur.com/FxRgKHE.jpg
You know you wish you had a physical one.

I stayed up late, hope you likes.

~KreenDurron
 ;)KeyCoin Kudo's Welcome: KQ4AjQzYjVpLDvsPaZx2VptsoDn6MtAMRG
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

No, not at all. We are close with members of various anon dev teams, and started with XC's released code as a base. The workings are more similar to DRK system.  We mentioned this to be respectful and follow the proper traditions of open source. The client part of XC is opensource but the server code isn't, therefore it's not something to be easily copied. The new server code that runs on the nodes is custom and has been proven secure, and the client side code is heavily modified also.

This is whats good about crypto and open source, start with the ideas and work of others, and build on it.

In the future, we may consider having every wallet function as a node. For now, we prefer the simplicity of having masternodes, so we can continue with the rest of our project.



full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Hey! Your requests have not fallen on deaf ears, we're in the process of making this happen right now. I'm also looking in to the VRC type ability to buy anything with it. I'll see what is possible as i weight out what the next moves are for funding and dev work.

Thanks again for your suggestion.

If anyone else has anything, please do not hesitate to post.



Things are on schedule. Coin is above previous values and looking good.  Once this project is completed I will be reviewing all suggestions for the  next piece of tech. Depending on cost I will fund it.



Have you considered adding a dedicated forum to keycoincrypto.com? That would help create a strong, focused KeyCoin community and keep people more engaged. Ignore these butthurt fudders who just don't know what they're doing.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
it is NOT xc rev 1 copy, it is a brand new code..

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

Absolute bullshit. He's copied rev 1 to a tee. Where's the source code?

How the hell would you know that if you dont have the source code genius?  Even if it was copied and made better..wasnt it open source?  Dont get butthurt if something is better. 
Hel
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins
missed the dip?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
it is NOT xc rev 1 copy, it is a brand new code..

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

Absolute bullshit. He's copied rev 1 to a tee. Where's the source code?

What proof do you have? Or is that the only FUD ammo left now that the devs delivered?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
it is NOT xc rev 1 copy, it is a brand new code..

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

Absolute bullshit. He's copied rev 1 to a tee. Where's the source code?
devs verfiy this?
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 100
it is NOT xc rev 1 copy, it is a brand new code..

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

Absolute bullshit. He's copied rev 1 to a tee. Where's the source code?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Such obvious fud with your little ohh no look out everyone they are going to steal all your coin. Non sense man, this was not a copy paste. This is new code that has been tested extensively.

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
it is NOT xc rev 1 copy, it is a brand new code..

So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins
full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
Magic internet moneys ftw
So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins

So let me get this straight, you didn't read the dev's explanation of the keycoin's anon feature yet? Or you actually did but decided to accuse the devs of copy/pasting the exact code of XC because your intentions are to sway investors away from Keycoin and into XC (whose volume have dissipated), or trying to buy in Keycoin cheap....
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 100
So let me get this straight. You copied XCs centralised non trustless mixer from Rev 1 and then you tell everyone you have better anon than XC, even though XC now is on Rev 2 which is a decentralised trustless mixer?

I hope you understand the flaws with Rev 1, otherwise someones gonna exploit your client and steal everyone's coins
member
Activity: 190
Merit: 13
Time to pop some bottles dev team!



Pop dem bottles brothers Woohooo YEAH
congrats to the team +1
PR0M dont fuk it up this time

Peace
BOLLOS
CRYPTCOIN MOD
Jump to: