[ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update - page 36.

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: Boomsling on August 07, 2014, 03:10:30 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hello,

I'm T.k. From Coins Source and i'm here to clarify any acts of malicious fud or attacks on the integrity of the KeyCoin development team.

We spent several hours investigating this matter this morning and have reached a conclusion as the attacks, which are false. The KeyCoin development team have comitted to their plan of action since the start and have released their Idenitifcations to us (which are held in cold storage and encrypted) and we believe that they are true in their intent.

If there are any further questions don't hesitate to contact us on IRC http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource

Here is the official tweets concluding our analysis on the status of KeyCoin
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455692131753984
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455867797590016

Again, we hold our TrustIndex with the highest integrity and reputation from Coins Source and the thousands of hours we've spent trying to assist our investors and users.

Regards,
CEO & Founder, T.k. Hamed

Edit: To understand what the Trust Index is, i highly suggest reading http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/
We are about to announce several improvements towards the Trust Index to help further filter developers.

Devil, go ask them. You have a invite

I have asked everyone here about 10 times, no answer yet from anyone?

I see:

Quote

The Trust Index is by no means a perfect indicator and it can’t 100% determine whether or not something is a scam

ZerOnEleven

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hello,

I'm T.k. From Coins Source and i'm here to clarify any acts of malicious fud or attacks on the integrity of the KeyCoin development team.

We spent several hours investigating this matter this morning and have reached a conclusion as the attacks, which are false. The KeyCoin development team have comitted to their plan of action since the start and have released their Idenitifcations to us (which are held in cold storage and encrypted) and we believe that they are true in their intent.

If there are any further questions don't hesitate to contact us on IRC http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource

Here is the official tweets concluding our analysis on the status of KeyCoin
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455692131753984
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455867797590016

Again, we hold our TrustIndex with the highest integrity and reputation from Coins Source and the thousands of hours we've spent trying to assist our investors and users.

Regards,
CEO & Founder, T.k. Hamed

Edit: To understand what the Trust Index is, i highly suggest reading http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/
We are about to announce several improvements towards the Trust Index to help further filter developers.

Thanks...... now we can relax.

Boomsling

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hello,

I'm T.k. From Coins Source and i'm here to clarify any acts of malicious fud or attacks on the integrity of the KeyCoin development team.

We spent several hours investigating this matter this morning and have reached a conclusion as the attacks, which are false. The KeyCoin development team have comitted to their plan of action since the start and have released their Idenitifcations to us (which are held in cold storage and encrypted) and we believe that they are true in their intent.

If there are any further questions don't hesitate to contact us on IRC http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource

Here is the official tweets concluding our analysis on the status of KeyCoin
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455692131753984
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455867797590016

Again, we hold our TrustIndex with the highest integrity and reputation from Coins Source and the thousands of hours we've spent trying to assist our investors and users.

Regards,
CEO & Founder, T.k. Hamed

Edit: To understand what the Trust Index is, i highly suggest reading http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/
We are about to announce several improvements towards the Trust Index to help further filter developers.

Devil, go ask them. You have a invite

just click this

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hello,

I'm T.k. From Coins Source and i'm here to clarify any acts of malicious fud or attacks on the integrity of the KeyCoin development team.

We spent several hours investigating this matter this morning and have reached a conclusion as the attacks, which are false. The KeyCoin development team have comitted to their plan of action since the start and have released their Idenitifcations to us (which are held in cold storage and encrypted) and we believe that they are true in their intent.

If there are any further questions don't hesitate to contact us on IRC http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource

Here is the official tweets concluding our analysis on the status of KeyCoin
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455692131753984
https://twitter.com/CoinsSource/status/497455867797590016

Again, we hold our TrustIndex with the highest integrity and reputation from Coins Source and the thousands of hours we've spent trying to assist our investors and users.

Regards,
CEO & Founder, T.k. Hamed

Maybe you can answer this, how do you know the person you verified is the real dev of this coin? what is to stop them paying someone to go through the verification process for them?

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: Boomsling on August 07, 2014, 03:06:02 PM

Quote from: DeViL303 on August 07, 2014, 02:57:08 PM

Quote from: pr0m3theus2013 on August 07, 2014, 02:54:55 PM

Ok, i've just completed my conversation with coinsource and they declared that the fud was indeed false, no foul play on the dev team. We're moving forward with things, I'm getting Encrypted messaging completed for a monday implementation, website is being updated both graphics and content, decentralized anon is growing closer to completion every day. I am not walking away, I am still holding all of my key and i plan to buy more (that 54 btc wall was mine) Thanks for all the support everyone!

Ha, the man himself, maybe you can answer what coinsource verification actually proves? how does anyone know that the person coinsource verified is indeed the dev of this coin?

yeah, coinsource do. That's the point.

What so you want, DNA testing?

coinsource do what? how do coinsource verify that the phone no, email, twitter etc etc, actually belong to a dev on this coin? what does this "verification" process prove?

Boomsling

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

Quote from: DeViL303 on August 07, 2014, 02:57:08 PM

Quote from: pr0m3theus2013 on August 07, 2014, 02:54:55 PM

Ok, i've just completed my conversation with coinsource and they declared that the fud was indeed false, no foul play on the dev team. We're moving forward with things, I'm getting Encrypted messaging completed for a monday implementation, website is being updated both graphics and content, decentralized anon is growing closer to completion every day. I am not walking away, I am still holding all of my key and i plan to buy more (that 54 btc wall was mine) Thanks for all the support everyone!

Ha, the man himself, maybe you can answer what coinsource verification actually proves? how does anyone know that the person coinsource verified is indeed the dev of this coin?

yeah, coinsource do. That's the point.

What so you want, DNA testing?

computerparts

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Could anybody briefly sum up what happened?

Sure no problem. Another day in bitcointalk. That should sum it up nicely.

ZerOnEleven

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: pr0m3theus2013 on August 07, 2014, 02:54:55 PM

Ok, i've just completed my conversation with coinsource and they declared that the fud was indeed false, no foul play on the dev team. We're moving forward with things, I'm getting Encrypted messaging completed for a monday implementation, website is being updated both graphics and content, decentralized anon is growing closer to completion every day. I am not walking away, I am still holding all of my key and i plan to buy more (that 54 btc wall was mine) Thanks for all the support everyone!

Thanks for the update.....phew...........

Erastos

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Could anybody briefly sum up what happened?

Keycoin was deanonymized, the source for the solution that does *not* require the sending wallet is available here.

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2cwpv2/new_keycoin_deanonymizer_app/

The first deanonymizer solution failed, as it only retrieved the first mixer address, this new update to the deanonymizer successfully retrieves the senders address, aka fully deanonymized transaction.

Quote

I've finished new version of KeyCoin deanonymizer. This program finds the addresses that belong to the sender and were used as inputs of anonymous transaction.
Source code is available here:
http://pastebin.com/7mKRCq18
The main difference between this deanonymizer and this one:
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/
is the output. This deanonymizer prints out the addresses that belong to the sender. The first deanonymizer returned the address of the first mixer (this was confirmed by Prometheus on BCT) and one had to go to blockchain explorer to find out which addresses sent coins to this mixer address.
This program DOES NOT NEED access to sender's keycoin wallet. It works with any wallet.
Example:
Call to Deanonymize(17873, 2.0198M) returns addresses:
KFoQcNPgaTP28ifFQWCcoTvEsJXAN4oBFD
KKk6RcYUnMbrT8jhAf2zzhW7TR3PM2fWzw
These are the same addresses that can be found manually:
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c9obo/example_of_how_keycoin_transaction_can_be/

Bagpipe

full member

Activity: 151

Merit: 100

Quote from: darkproton on August 07, 2014, 01:47:27 PM

Quote from: MeAndYouForever on August 07, 2014, 01:43:56 PM

i must be heard! and hugged

Coinsource is not the stamp of approval. They go through a checklist of stuff. They are responding to the accusations made in here by sad shitty crypt bag holders. If they come back and say key is clean, you guys will accuse coinsource of being paid off. I look at dan metcalf code review as the main approval of this coin. Another dev, of a competing coin, reviewed the code base. He said it was clean and innovative. Suck it fools.

The same Dan Metcalf sending MoosaNYC to grease hands of btc-e to introduce CRYPT?

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: pr0m3theus2013 on August 07, 2014, 02:54:55 PM

Ok, i've just completed my conversation with coinsource and they declared that the fud was indeed false, no foul play on the dev team. We're moving forward with things, I'm getting Encrypted messaging completed for a monday implementation, website is being updated both graphics and content, decentralized anon is growing closer to completion every day. I am not walking away, I am still holding all of my key and i plan to buy more (that 54 btc wall was mine) Thanks for all the support everyone!

Ha, the man himself, maybe you can answer what coinsource verification actually proves? how does anyone know that the person coinsource verified is indeed the dev of this coin?

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: RichardT on August 07, 2014, 02:46:37 PM

Oh wow, looks like every Fudder in the history of keycoin's 4 week existence is here to take a stab. To people who are not aware, these guys have been proven wrong over and over again. Do your research before selling your coins cheap.

+1, you are right, this guys have been proven wrong over and over, just take a look at their history, cinni, dope, crypt, etc etc, and now keycoin too. "Do your research" is very good advice. Wink

pr0m3theus2013

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Ok, i've just completed my conversation with coinsource and they declared that the fud was indeed false, no foul play on the dev team. We're moving forward with things, I'm getting Encrypted messaging completed for a monday implementation, website is being updated both graphics and content, decentralized anon is growing closer to completion every day. I am not walking away, I am still holding all of my key and i plan to buy more (that 54 btc wall was mine) Thanks for all the support everyone!

ZerOnEleven

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

People selling at 13000 will be buying back in 20 minutes at 18000

Cool

MeAndYouForever

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

This was also blamed on that investing site cryptowhales yesterday and that was bullshit. The anon technology in key is already implemented in other coins. What really is going to hurt people are the ones that supported it. The ones that were paid off to make this look like gold. Enjoy your 10k. Pumpers will try and keep it going but when no investors buy back in they will sell at a lose and leave bagholders like every other coin these guys touch.

DeViL303

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 103

SESAME

Quote from: CrimsonPermanentAssurance on August 07, 2014, 02:42:31 PM

Quote from: Maza-plan on August 07, 2014, 02:13:49 PM

enough is enough, keycoin lead Dev should just come here an admit it's scam...

http://crypto-news.tumblr.com/post/94085864023/new-keycoin-deanonymizer-app

Pr0m3theus,

You really should respond to this ASAP. People are quickly losing all confidence, and that could be prevented with a meaningful post from you.

Yes, you've realised now that this program is a new version that works better than the first release, but you think 1 meaningful post from pr0m could stop this coin going under 10k?!! well its very close, key just hit 10.1k on cryptsy.

Someone must really hate you guys to create programs like this :

Quote

New KeyCoin deanonymizer app

I’ve finished new version of KeyCoin deanonymizer. This program finds the addresses that belong to the sender and were used as inputs of anonymous transaction.

Source code is available here:

http://ift.tt/1vgVCin

The main difference between this deanonymizer and this one:

http://ift.tt/1prbg4T

is the output. This deanonymizer prints out the addresses that belong to the sender. The first deanonymizer returned the address of the first mixer (this was confirmed by Prometheus on BCT) and one had to go to blockchain explorer to find out which addresses sent coins to this mixer address.

This program DOES NOT NEED access to sender’s keycoin wallet. It works with any wallet.

Example:

Call to Deanonymize(17873, 2.0198M) returns addresses:

KFoQcNPgaTP28ifFQWCcoTvEsJXAN4oBFD

KKk6RcYUnMbrT8jhAf2zzhW7TR3PM2fWzw

These are the same addresses that can be found manually:

http://ift.tt/1pu2Iua
submitted by KeyCoinDeanonymizer
]

Full info: http://ift.tt/1nwIifM
August 07, 2014 at 09:55PM
Crypto-Currency: Reddit

ZerOnEleven

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: RichardT on August 07, 2014, 02:46:37 PM

Oh wow, looks like every Fudder in the history of keycoin's 4 week existence is here to take a stab. To people who are not aware, these guys have been proven wrong over and over again. Do your research before selling your coins cheap.

+1000

RichardT

sr. member

Activity: 391

Merit: 250

Oh wow, looks like every Fudder in the history of keycoin's 4 week existence is here to take a stab. To people who are not aware, these guys have been proven wrong over and over again. Do your research before selling your coins cheap.

ZerOnEleven

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

to the M000000n guys....cheap coins.....

bluestang

full member

Activity: 128

Merit: 100

Quote from: DeViL303 on August 07, 2014, 02:38:48 PM

Quote from: bluestang on August 07, 2014, 02:37:49 PM

Wow, some people just have sad lives don't they.

+1

I was referring to the FUDDERS like you. :SMH

Topic: [ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update - page 36. (Read 188852 times)