Quote
implement nice features (i.e. anonymity)
Be careful what you wish for. The current implementations of anonymity break the fully distributed nature of the cryptocoin model; I personally don't think this is a good tradeoff.
Topic: [ANN] LitecoinPlus (XLC) / super fast / green / great team! - page 31. (Read 77073 times)
Be careful what you wish for. The current implementations of anonymity break the fully distributed nature of the cryptocoin model; I personally don't think this is a good tradeoff.
Im holding just because I feel this has the same future as XBC. The dev will step aside and hand it over to another dev, maybe the same one working on XBC now. I just see XBC and XLC coexisting together, like how BTC and LTC have been over the last few months.
I wouldn't expect anyone holding to speak too negatively, and yeah, at these prices, might as well hold if you bought at ipo or higher prices. I'm still holding a small amount, but it's not so much that it'd make a big difference to me.
I'm not so sure about the XBC/XLC coexisting part exactly... yeah, they both can 'exist', but no idea what one will have to do with another. And I can't speak for anyone on the XBC team, but I see no logical reason for them to also take over XLC.
Well its a rare coin with good specs. If the team does take over and have a continuous development plan and implement nice features (i.e. anonymity), with a community backing it, then it has a really good future. It can easily complement XBC. And I bought mine at 8000-1100, so I can sell right now and still end up with a small profit, but given the potential Id rather take the risk and hold.
already talks about take over 
if dev steps up things could move forward nicely..lets wait on what he has to say.
if dev steps up things could move forward nicely..lets wait on what he has to say.
Im holding just because I feel this has the same future as XBC. The dev will step aside and hand it over to another dev, maybe the same one working on XBC now. I just see XBC and XLC coexisting together, like how BTC and LTC have been over the last few months.
I wouldn't expect anyone holding to speak too negatively, and yeah, at these prices, might as well hold if you bought at ipo or higher prices. I'm still holding a small amount, but it's not so much that it'd make a big difference to me.
I'm not so sure about the XBC/XLC coexisting part exactly... yeah, they both can 'exist', but no idea what one will have to do with another. And I can't speak for anyone on the XBC team, but I see no logical reason for them to also take over XLC.
Im holding just because I feel this has the same future as XBC. The dev will step aside and hand it over to another dev, maybe the same one working on XBC now. I just see XBC and XLC coexisting together, like how BTC and LTC have been over the last few months.
i can understand that the dev might want to keep certain things out of the thread... ok fine
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
Yes, for some things this may be valid. But when the dev is spreading completely false information, it should not go unnoticed or uncommented. To delete such posts without offering a rebuttal (which in this case is basically impossible; I know my facts here) should be a warning sign to all who have invested or an considering investing in the work produced by this dev. Enough said, I'll shut up now. Draw your own conclusions.
Ah, I see my comments were deleted too. I thought I was pretty fair with my questions, simply asking why the xbc wallet would affect xlc's schedule. I'm hardly the troll-sort.
An XBC member even posted here, clearing things up. And his entire post was removed.
And I'm glad I didn't get much xlc, and already sold enough to give me a tiny profit. I don't mind moderation when they go around deleting obvious trolls, but I read the comments that were deleted... nothing was that bad. It's a terrible sign when a dev does that.
i can understand that the dev might want to keep certain things out of the thread... ok fine
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
Yes, for some things this may be valid. But when the dev is spreading completely false information, it should not go unnoticed or uncommented. To delete such posts without offering a rebuttal (which in this case is basically impossible; I know my facts here) should be a warning sign to all who have invested or an considering investing in the work produced by this dev. Enough said, I'll shut up now. Draw your own conclusions.
i can understand that the dev might want to keep certain things out of the thread... ok fine
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
If you tell your investors who have given you money that you are delaying the work they effectively paid for because of xbc wallet (whether you worked on this or not), then they have all the rights to ask you to clear that up..
make some announcements dev before its too late..if you are there to delete posts then you can also reply to concerned investors who have given you money..be a man..jesus
edit; and start being active and create a community.. instead of sitting there being quiet and not telling your invstors wtf you're up to. last week you said you were busy with a xlc team..where is it?
But when I ask what are the plans for this coin and what sort of features we should be expecting, and that gets ignored/deleted that is pretty bad..
If you tell your investors who have given you money that you are delaying the work they effectively paid for because of xbc wallet (whether you worked on this or not), then they have all the rights to ask you to clear that up..
make some announcements dev before its too late..if you are there to delete posts then you can also reply to concerned investors who have given you money..be a man..jesus
edit; and start being active and create a community.. instead of sitting there being quiet and not telling your invstors wtf you're up to. last week you said you were busy with a xlc team..where is it?
Has anyone spoken to Busoni recently about adding XLC?
there is no use for any of us to speak with busoni, as he wants to talk to the dev himself.
Has anyone spoken to Busoni recently about adding XLC?
itll be good to see a roadmap or plans for the coin.
Have you thought about implementing anon features dev? such a rare coin could experience an amazing growth in price, and dare i say come close to ltc prices, with the right features and dev support.
Have you thought about implementing anon features dev? such a rare coin could experience an amazing growth in price, and dare i say come close to ltc prices, with the right features and dev support.
blockexplorer down?
Is same dev of XBC? And what is future plans for this coin? Can any investors tell me why its worth investing please? thanks
Hi, I am also having trouble with the wallet not fully synching. It gets stuck just over 2000 blocks ago. It appeared to be synching properly so I sent my coins from exchange expecting it would complete. I need to maintain the address it was sent to. Any suggestions please?
have you redownloaded the blockchain?
Hi, I am also having trouble with the wallet not fully synching. It gets stuck just over 2000 blocks ago. It appeared to be synching properly so I sent my coins from exchange expecting it would complete. I need to maintain the address it was sent to. Any suggestions please?
yes it would probably say "rescanning" in the wallet logo before the wallet finallly starts.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
no i just change to "litecoinplus-qt -rescan" this is what you said. so do i do it like "litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan" ?
i havent tryed that "repair wallet" yet, i will do that also.
thanks again.
you do it like c:\whatever.your.directories.are\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan
so the -rescan comes after the "
and yes busoni would list it, he just wanted to clear some things up first with the dev.
man you are a fcking LEGEND!! got my balance back in stake
well chuffed now. "repair wallet" worked a treat send me ur xlc wallet address and il send you some coin
yes it would probably say "rescanning" in the wallet logo before the wallet finallly starts.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
no i just change to "litecoinplus-qt -rescan" this is what you said. so do i do it like "litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan" ?
i havent tryed that "repair wallet" yet, i will do that also.
thanks again.
you do it like c:\whatever.your.directories.are\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan
so the -rescan comes after the "
and yes busoni would list it, he just wanted to clear some things up first with the dev.
Voted as well, but we should really try to get on Polo.
POLO said it will not take it on but this is a good coin..I have nearly 2k of it..
I remember Busoni said he would take it, as long as Dev resolved the issues between them. He never completely dismissed it, so I'd say it's not impossible for it to get on Polo.
However, I agree this coin is starting to look better and better as the days go by =)
yes it would probably say "rescanning" in the wallet logo before the wallet finallly starts.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
did you add it like
litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan ?
have you tried "repairwallet" in debug/console? and i would backup your wallet just in case.
no i just change to "litecoinplus-qt -rescan" this is what you said. so do i do it like "litecoinplus\litecoinplus-qt.exe" -rescan" ?
i havent tryed that "repair wallet" yet, i will do that also.
thanks again.
Voted as well, but we should really try to get on Polo.
POLO said it will not take it on but this is a good coin..I have nearly 2k of it..
Jump to: