Dev-fee is too high and we are missing CUDA optimized miner. We already have OpenCL miner. So I suggest you lower the dev-fee and make a CUDA version.
Well technically OpenCL is not necessarily slower than CUDA. Usually is is only that most OpenCL codes are optimized for AMD and the OpenCL bindings of AMD are a bit more efficient. But generally I think improving the algorithms behind will bring more sol/s than changing to CUDA which would be a pain for me to learn
By the way: my development and testing machines have Nvidia GPUs running under Linux. So the current version is rather optimized for NVidia. For AMD I only know that the miner works, but I am completely in the dark how fast it is. So at this time this is a Nvidia optimized software.
By the way: I will surely lower the fee to 1% in the future. But right now I just have to get a start
Thanks for the miner, but i dont really get how to start a 6 gpu rig
Your comment with platform is confusing, i dont understand it at all
Well you can have multiple drivers on your system, e.g. when you have graphic cards from multiple vendors in your rig. Then the OpenCL drivers are organized in platforms, so all cards belonging to the one vendor are in platform 0, all from the second in platform 1 and so on.
As for the device selection the devices are sorted by their platform.
Lets assume that you have all 6 GPUs from the same GPU Chip Vendor (AMD or Nvidia ... the concrete creator of the card (Gainward, MSI, ... ) do not matter). Then it is likely that you have only one platform on your machine that has index 0.
So you then can start the miner just 6 times, but with different device parameter:
--device 0
--device 1
...
--device 5
Then all cards should get utilized well.