Pages:
Author

Topic: ANN Mandatory update FLAP FINAL Miners to share BILLIONS of Coins 10 days !SWAP! - page 34. (Read 40444 times)

hero member
Activity: 723
Merit: 501
strattum connection refused on the pool all ports.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I'm re downloading the wallet using the bootstrap and it appears it isn't accounting for almost 9 million coins I mined in the last few weeks. still 159 weeks behind but they arent showing up in transaction or unconfirmed. Will see what happens
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
Thank you... I finally reverted and looked at the first post LOL
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I don't see the source code and I have to leave in a few hours and wont be back for about a week. Just going to mine on Flapmins pool for the time.

is there a ip for that here?
Yes sir: http://138.68.234.216/getting_started
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
I don't see the source code and I have to leave in a few hours and wont be back for about a week. Just going to mine on Flapmins pool for the time.

is there a ip for that here?
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I don't see the source code and I have to leave in a few hours and wont be back for about a week. Just going to mine on Flapmins pool for the time.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
Is the daemon source ready for a node compile? 

If so, where is the source located now?  Seems all previous locations are not viable.
uBm
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
Node is syncin , might need an hour - then blockcrawler is back up again.
if anyone has a serious Node runnning ( on a vps , dedi server , not down in 2 weeks )
i could link the crawler to that node, should be a wallet with NO coins in it, as i need to have rpc access to the wallet/node.
The webadress is correct, i only had to shut the wallet down since you changed/hardforked it- temporary msg will dissapear and blockcrawler will do it´s work again on that address.

edit: i only have one node from Flapmin as network, where are all the others ? i added flapmins second node and some of the others also ..

Simple Blockcrawler
http://blockcrawler.rf.gd/index.php

Would need a "always on Node" temporary i am using my one

Donation/Bounty:
Flap FHt6NQ57seYkRMFDp75w27UNU4m42Wh4SR
ETH 0x61ecb00f1042a6f92aea4b0740d31a7aba270762
Doge D6PRqCegz3tAebZtEqBv3cyyJVFTyDuU4T




give me a bit ive not had a chance to look at it pm me the link you would like me to use for ann

sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
Night guys . ill get someone to push the source for me when i get up
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
Simple Blockcrawler
http://blockcrawler.rf.gd/index.php

Would need a "always on Node" temporary i am using my one

Donation/Bounty:
Flap FHt6NQ57seYkRMFDp75w27UNU4m42Wh4SR
ETH 0x61ecb00f1042a6f92aea4b0740d31a7aba270762
Doge D6PRqCegz3tAebZtEqBv3cyyJVFTyDuU4T




give me a bit ive not had a chance to look at it pm me the link you would like me to use for ann
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
anyone up i have the win wallet gonna work on the ann and links before i crash out
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
So jet this shit ... i just spent 5 hrs fighting with rpc password issues and nodes .....
it would not connect until i took the numbers out of my password and user name in the .conf

is this a know node js issue ?



anyway immediately nodes fired up and connected after i found that bug

finishing setting up waiting on the win wallet guy
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
...FlappyCoin 2014 developers may have haphazardly set it to 70003, most other coins keep it at 70002.


It followed the update to litecoin core which went from 70002 to 70003 , many coins out there didn't use the newer litecoin code, thus the many 70002 versions.

Based on a year old reddit post, flappy also at one time had a 70005 protocol version (staking fix?) , , tho, there are probably not all that many old wallets around now..

66coin killed itself when the dev added code to disconnect nodes with blocks that new nodes didn't like, don't do that, it splits the network into 2 sets of nodes, one each on each rule set, because nodes can't get the correct blocks because other nodes disconnect them before they can get any new block data, so there is no hope of the orphaned half of the network ever getting the right chain back. just make consensus rules reject the blocks, that is all you needed here really...(it still forks, but the new clients would accept blocks mined under the old rules, so it would tend to keep bridging the chains, so you don't get a massive split, just lots of random orphan chains until everyone upgrades)

Likely doesn't matter so much with flappy right at the moment, since all the nodes are in the room so to speak, just wanted to point out the disconnect thing is potentially hairy


the first fork i did took place before the pos addition this coin will not pos
....trust me the tea and i mined ahead 20k blocks to see what was going to happen , we had help from
several devs looking over the code over months  . the second was to fix an issue that was caused buy low paying blocks and high fees
the reason we had a problem ...im pretty sure is i listed the proto number incorrectly .. someone changed in there local wallet becoming the sync node since their proto number was the highest on the network.... however since they were blocking the lower end they were not handing out any blocks thus taking off with the chain ... ive made the corrections. also ive added two seednodes and most of you are on windows that causes issues when no win wallet was available yet  its seriously on me i was in error .. however its not the hardest time ive had with this coin it took 3 months to get it cleaned up enough in the first place .. i save the chain often its unlikely the coin will ever break break again after we get started and if it does we will simply make the fix ... sorry guys my bad im just glad it happend now i want is to have a good 200-300k blocks without having to make any changes hopefully were good as gold now . im updating chains on the nodes now and then ill just bee making sure we have connection . 
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 11
...FlappyCoin 2014 developers may have haphazardly set it to 70003, most other coins keep it at 70002.


It followed the update to litecoin core which went from 70002 to 70003 , many coins out there didn't use the newer litecoin code, thus the many 70002 versions.

Based on a year old reddit post, flappy also at one time had a 70005 protocol version (staking fix?) , , tho, there are probably not all that many old wallets around now..

66coin killed itself when the dev added code to disconnect nodes with blocks that new nodes didn't like, don't do that, it splits the network into 2 sets of nodes, one each on each rule set, because nodes can't get the correct blocks because other nodes disconnect them before they can get any new block data, so there is no hope of the orphaned half of the network ever getting the right chain back. just make consensus rules reject the blocks, that is all you needed here really...(it still forks, but the new clients would accept blocks mined under the old rules, so it would tend to keep bridging the chains, so you don't get a massive split, just lots of random orphan chains until everyone upgrades)

Likely doesn't matter so much with flappy right at the moment, since all the nodes are in the room so to speak, just wanted to point out the disconnect thing is potentially hairy


sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
im about to test the nodes window wallet guy says he will have time in about 30 min

sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
Looks like there was a ton of chaos here in the last day.

I'm sure this coin can survive another hard fork... as it's done it enough times in the past with more hash power. However, was this necessary? Reducing the default transaction fee is not even a soft-fork change. Blocks accepted at a lower transaction fee are still valid in the blockchain for the old clients. You can just introduce the lower fees by adding more hashpower with the new clients (basically what we started doing last week with command-line options), then the whole network retains its hash power and low-fee transactions eventually make it through, even more so as time goes on and users migrate.

Hard forks are required for changing the block reward, so maybe that's at hand here too? (edit: ok, now I see the title that says "payouts" are fixed, so sounds like it.) If so, it would be nice to see the specific changes to the code. At https://github.com/Flapmin I only see the old repo.

edit: Found and earlier post with the link https://github.com/Flapmin/FLAPsp1 but that is 404 now.

I have the pool pretty much good and can change things as time goes on but, I just started getting this message on the p2pool site:
Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: This version is obsolete, upgrade required!

However, I am still able to mine and am receiving rewards. Thoughts?
Cool. There were a couple places with VERSION in the p2pool code that initially seemed to have no effect. I was probably supposed to be set to 91337 there as well, although apparently you guys are changing it again.

In the future I think we should be cautious about changing this number. Although the FlappyCoin 2014 developers may have haphazardly set it to 70003, most other coins keep it at 70002. p2pool probably isn't the only codebase that doesn't play nice with such changes.

chance you will claim the bounty for win wallet??
I'd be interested in getting my MinGW environment back into shape. How much is the bounty for?

As I mentioned I could use some prebuilt static binaries for boost, db4.8, openssl, miniupnpc. So perhaps you could get me in touch with your super-busy friend so he could send those over?

The bounty is 50 million ATM
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
Looks like there was a ton of chaos here in the last day.

I'm sure this coin can survive another hard fork... as it's done it enough times in the past with more hash power. However, was this necessary? Reducing the default transaction fee is not even a soft-fork change. Blocks accepted at a lower transaction fee are still valid in the blockchain for the old clients. You can just introduce the lower fees by adding more hashpower with the new clients (basically what we started doing last week with command-line options), then the whole network retains its hash power and low-fee transactions eventually make it through, even more so as time goes on and users migrate.

Hard forks are required for changing the block reward, so maybe that's at hand here too? (edit: ok, now I see the title that says "payouts" are fixed, so sounds like it.) If so, it would be nice to see the specific changes to the code. At https://github.com/Flapmin I only see the old repo.

edit: Found and earlier post with the link https://github.com/Flapmin/FLAPsp1 but that is 404 now.

I have the pool pretty much good and can change things as time goes on but, I just started getting this message on the p2pool site:
Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: This version is obsolete, upgrade required!

However, I am still able to mine and am receiving rewards. Thoughts?
Cool. There were a couple places with VERSION in the p2pool code that initially seemed to have no effect. I was probably supposed to be set to 91337 there as well, although apparently you guys are changing it again.

In the future I think we should be cautious about changing this number. Although the FlappyCoin 2014 developers may have haphazardly set it to 70003, most other coins keep it at 70002. p2pool probably isn't the only codebase that doesn't play nice with such changes.

chance you will claim the bounty for win wallet??
I'd be interested in getting my MinGW environment back into shape. How much is the bounty for?

As I mentioned I could use some prebuilt static binaries for boost, db4.8, openssl, miniupnpc. So perhaps you could get me in touch with your super-busy friend so he could send those over?
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
see we stopped on the chain a few blocks early thanks everyone ill get on the checkpoint now
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
Ill be making a checkpoint from block 779500
any blocks found after that will be orphaned
submitting wallet for windows build
Please recompile for pool and daemon operators and enthusiasts
the issue is a protocol one atm ill be putting up 3 nodes at launch
hopefully this is all the maintenance to get us threw to 900k+ blocks


Is it safe to pull down and recompile?

no ill pull it down
its not going to hurt just waist your time
there is an error in the proto version listed
and what is being used just waiting for the p2p pool to hit block
779500 about 40 min and ill grab the checkpoint and recompile and upload
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
Ill be making a checkpoint from block 779500
any blocks found after that will be orphaned
submitting wallet for windows build
Please recompile for pool and daemon operators and enthusiasts
the issue is a protocol one atm ill be putting up 3 nodes at launch
hopefully this is all the maintenance to get us threw to 900k+ blocks


Is it safe to pull down and recompile?
Pages:
Jump to: