Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] MasterCoin [MST] Sync problems fixed, updated 9 Sept 2013 - page 13. (Read 51182 times)

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
You do realize that everyone installing your software will be violating MasterCard's copyright?
Why should anyone use your coin if that means *they* risk being sued by MasterCard?
This is INSANE.
While he clearly is promoting a quarter-assed pump&dump shitcoin, this post is so outrageously senseless that someone might think he is in the right.
Please remove it.
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
STARCOIN the BEST
tomorrow will be visacoin
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Secondly, it's only half of their logo.
So you admit *that*. Do you think you'd get away with a CocaCoin with the word "Coca" in white on a red background?
Your problem is that the mere possibility of a copyright lawsuit will drive users away from your coin.


Yes, I think I could. Copyrights and patents are very specific. Relax guy Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
Secondly, it's only half of their logo.
So you admit *that*. Do you think you'd get away with a CocaCoin with the word "Coca" in white on a red background?
Your problem is that the mere possibility of a copyright lawsuit will drive users away from your coin.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Updated main post, with first MasterCoin's first free contest Smiley
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
If MasterCard wants to sue me, they are welcome too Wink

You do realize that everyone installing your software will be violating MasterCard's copyright?
Why should anyone use your coin if that means *they* risk being sued by MasterCard?


That's not true at all. First of all, their logo is nowhere within the Mastercoin client. It's not even their logo at all, it's a orange circle, with the word Master in it. Secondly, it's only half of their logo. Pretty sure MasterCard does not own the word "master" Roll Eyes

Why don't you make your own unique logo instead of cutting Mastercards in half? This is either plain strange or just lazy.

FFS, he didn't make the logo. He offered a bounty for a logo, someone submitted it, and he paid the bounty for it. Not everyone is a graphic designer Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
Product Marketing & Promotion / Software Developer
If MasterCard wants to sue me, they are welcome too Wink

You do realize that everyone installing your software will be violating MasterCard's copyright?
Why should anyone use your coin if that means *they* risk being sued by MasterCard?


That's not true at all. First of all, their logo is nowhere within the Mastercoin client. It's not even their logo at all, it's a orange circle, with the word Master in it. Secondly, it's only half of their logo. Pretty sure MasterCard does not own the word "master" Roll Eyes

Why don't you make your own unique logo instead of cutting Mastercards in half? This is either plain strange or just lazy.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
If MasterCard wants to sue me, they are welcome too Wink

You do realize that everyone installing your software will be violating MasterCard's copyright?
Why should anyone use your coin if that means *they* risk being sued by MasterCard?


That's not true at all. First of all, their logo is nowhere within the Mastercoin client. It's not even their logo at all, it's a orange circle, with the word Master in it. Secondly, it's only half of their logo. Pretty sure MasterCard does not own the word "master" Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
If MasterCard wants to sue me, they are welcome too Wink

Erm... you really don't want to be taken seriously, do you?
You do realize that everyone installing your software will be violating MasterCard's copyright?
Why should anyone use your coin if that means *they* risk being sued by MasterCard?
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0

You didn't think the Code was Copy&Paste enough, so you went ahead and Copy&Pasted the logo off Google?..

I don't think MasterCard would be too happy with you using their logo like this Smiley ( or well, half of it anyway )

I didn't copy and paste it, I offered a bounty for a logo, someone submitted it, I liked it, I paid out the bounty for it. If MasterCard wants to sue me, they are welcome too Wink
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

You didn't think the Code was Copy&Paste enough, so you went ahead and Copy&Pasted the logo off Google?..

I don't think MasterCard would be too happy with you using their logo like this Smiley ( or well, half of it anyway )
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Updated with new logo Smiley
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
My point is still valid. Changing the difficulty isn't really contributing with something new.
I'm all for creating alt-coins for learning purposes. I have done so myself, for learning purposes. With emphasis on learning purposes.

Pushing a half-assed coin to the public is done for no other reason than trying to make money off of people wanting to be " early adopters " on the " next big thing ". It won't happen. It will only end in a few early adopters, and the creator, dumping their massive premine ( even though it's not premine, it's pretty much a premine if you're the first one to start mining it ) for a great profit, and a few morons losing actually valuable coins in the process.
It's a well known process to most on here by now, seeing as it's happening every day.


I will continue being an asshole if it prevents people from posting shitcoins on here, for the betterment of the entire community.

Well said, I totally agree.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
So what you've done is you've made a coin that has everything needed to make the developers rich when they dump every coin in a few weeks time?
Good job!

/e; I shouldn't say "Developers", because copy&pasting is hardly developing.

The premine is tiny. Would never make me "rich". Unless ofcourse, it surpassed litecoin or Bitcoin, but, in that case, I deserve a little profit.
I'm giving most of my premine away, over time.

Very few coins, are written from scratch. I took something existing, and made it better. Not uncommon for to use already existing source code, to make something else. That's why source code exists, and that's the deffenition of open source. I'm sorry you don't like my coin.

Define " better ".
What you've done is changed some numbers. You probably don't even truly know what they do, just that they do something and that something will generate free money for you if people are dumb enough to mine your shitcoin.

Also, you're right that not many coins are written from scratch. I'd say < 0.5%. However, the coins that actually made it anywhere isn't pure copy&paste. They are actually contributing with something new, your coin is not.

Just stop this madness...

Don't be an asshole. I actually looked at the code. Yes he started with the foocoin source code. sure he probably followed the guide for the most part. But he did go deeper, and change some more complicated features, such as diff adjust and the reward ramping. Is it copy paste for the most part, yep. Did takes as much work as starting from scratch? nope. Did he still spend probably at least 2 weeks of his spare time, researching, compiling and testing? probably. At least it has a working windows client, and he only premined a very small fraction.
I'm not defending this shitty coin, but the guy generally seemed like he made this coin as a learning experience. This could just be a test coin. maybe something better is in the works.

My point is still valid. Changing the difficulty isn't really contributing with something new.
I'm all for creating alt-coins for learning purposes. I have done so myself, for learning purposes. With emphasis on learning purposes.

Pushing a half-assed coin to the public is done for no other reason than trying to make money off of people wanting to be " early adopters " on the " next big thing ". It won't happen. It will only end in a few early adopters, and the creator, dumping their massive premine ( even though it's not premine, it's pretty much a premine if you're the first one to start mining it ) for a great profit, and a few morons losing actually valuable coins in the process.
It's a well known process to most on here by now, seeing as it's happening every day.


I will continue being an asshole if it prevents people from posting shitcoins on here, for the betterment of the entire community.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1031
Rational Exuberance
I saw "MasterCoin" and got all excited because I thought maybe somebody had finally implemented my whitepaper.

Oh well. Good luck with this.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
So what you've done is you've made a coin that has everything needed to make the developers rich when they dump every coin in a few weeks time?
Good job!

/e; I shouldn't say "Developers", because copy&pasting is hardly developing.

The premine is tiny. Would never make me "rich". Unless ofcourse, it surpassed litecoin or Bitcoin, but, in that case, I deserve a little profit.
I'm giving most of my premine away, over time.

Very few coins, are written from scratch. I took something existing, and made it better. Not uncommon for to use already existing source code, to make something else. That's why source code exists, and that's the deffenition of open source. I'm sorry you don't like my coin.

Define " better ".
What you've done is changed some numbers. You probably don't even truly know what they do, just that they do something and that something will generate free money for you if people are dumb enough to mine your shitcoin.

Also, you're right that not many coins are written from scratch. I'd say < 0.5%. However, the coins that actually made it anywhere isn't pure copy&paste. They are actually contributing with something new, your coin is not.

Just stop this madness...

Don't be an asshole. I actually looked at the code. Yes he started with the foocoin source code. sure he probably followed the guide for the most part. But he did go deeper, and change some more complicated features, such as diff adjust and the reward ramping. Is it copy paste for the most part, yep. Did takes as much work as starting from scratch? nope. Did he still spend probably at least 2 weeks of his spare time, researching, compiling and testing? probably. At least it has a working windows client, and he only premined a very small fraction.

+1
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
So what you've done is you've made a coin that has everything needed to make the developers rich when they dump every coin in a few weeks time?
Good job!

/e; I shouldn't say "Developers", because copy&pasting is hardly developing.

The premine is tiny. Would never make me "rich". Unless ofcourse, it surpassed litecoin or Bitcoin, but, in that case, I deserve a little profit.
I'm giving most of my premine away, over time.

Very few coins, are written from scratch. I took something existing, and made it better. Not uncommon for to use already existing source code, to make something else. That's why source code exists, and that's the deffenition of open source. I'm sorry you don't like my coin.

Define " better ".
What you've done is changed some numbers. You probably don't even truly know what they do, just that they do something and that something will generate free money for you if people are dumb enough to mine your shitcoin.

Also, you're right that not many coins are written from scratch. I'd say < 0.5%. However, the coins that actually made it anywhere isn't pure copy&paste. They are actually contributing with something new, your coin is not.

Just stop this madness...

Don't be an asshole. I actually looked at the code. Yes he started with the foocoin source code. sure he probably followed the guide for the most part. But he did go deeper, and change some more complicated features, such as diff adjust and the reward ramping. Is it copy paste for the most part, yep. Did takes as much work as starting from scratch? nope. Did he still spend probably at least 2 weeks of his spare time, researching, compiling and testing? probably. At least it has a working windows client, and he only premined a very small fraction.
I'm not defending this shitty coin, but the guy generally seemed like he made this coin as a learning experience. This could just be a test coin. maybe something better is in the works.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
So what you've done is you've made a coin that has everything needed to make the developers rich when they dump every coin in a few weeks time?
Good job!

/e; I shouldn't say "Developers", because copy&pasting is hardly developing.

The premine is tiny. Would never make me "rich". Unless ofcourse, it surpassed litecoin or Bitcoin, but, in that case, I deserve a little profit.
I'm giving most of my premine away, over time.

Very few coins, are written from scratch. I took something existing, and made it better. Not uncommon for to use already existing source code, to make something else. That's why source code exists, and that's the deffenition of open source. I'm sorry you don't like my coin.

Define " better ".
What you've done is changed some numbers. You probably don't even truly know what they do, just that they do something and that something will generate free money for you if people are dumb enough to mine your shitcoin.

Also, you're right that not many coins are written from scratch. I'd say < 0.5%. However, the coins that actually made it anywhere isn't pure copy&paste. They are actually contributing with something new, your coin is not.

Just stop this madness...
Pages:
Jump to: