[ANN] microCoin MRC - alcurEX - Scrypt-Jane - nFactor - page 125.

HuuHachu

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: freshmeat on February 21, 2014, 06:36:19 AM

The dump is on at poloniex ....

yes dumping has commenced, I have no coins on the exchange all are in my wallet so I cant sell.

The bug is identified and easy to correct, a patched version is currently being tested ... no need to dump

Should buy instead

jcarl987

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

I think the idea is that not all miners will return at once, so there will be a period of low difficulty to start with. Hopefully it will come back online while I'm still awake to make up for the 6 hours spent sleeping and mining nothing last night.

Mr.V

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: spiffcow on February 21, 2014, 06:40:14 AM

So is there an ETA on this? It's 2:30 am and I need to get some sleep, but don't want to miss a giant goldrush when the servers come back online. Maybe you should set the block rewards to 0 for a few hundred blocks, just to get everyone time to get back on?

There wont be a gold rush because the diff retargets every block so it could jump from 0 to 4 if all the miners return anyway.

bittick

hero member

Activity: 2296

Merit: 506

Cryptocasino.com

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: freshmeat on February 21, 2014, 06:36:19 AM

The dump is on at poloniex ....

yes dumping has commenced, I have no coins on the exchange all are in my wallet so I cant sell.

yet you can buy some more

spiffcow

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: freshmeat on February 21, 2014, 06:36:19 AM

The dump is on at poloniex ....

How so? Sell prices are still at .00000200, which is near the high for the week

spiffcow

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

So is there an ETA on this? It's 2:30 am and I need to get some sleep, but don't want to miss a giant goldrush when the servers come back online. Maybe you should set the block rewards to 0 for a few hundred blocks, just to get everyone time to get back on?

jinhuadfh1

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

oh god I just bought some MRC in poloniex and transfer is to Mintpal but it always in pending stuts, what can i do?

freshmeat

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

The dump is on at poloniex ....

lexa

full member

Activity: 120

Merit: 100

Quote from: mattbigblue on February 21, 2014, 06:32:33 AM

so atm mining is pointless??

Yes, until issue is resolved

mattbigblue

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

so atm mining is pointless??

lexa

full member

Activity: 120

Merit: 100

Quote from: MCR on February 21, 2014, 06:23:57 AM

Quote from: HuuHachu on February 21, 2014, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

MRC comes from TIX. We have found the proof-of-stake checkpoint and removed it. We now face the problem of testing if the problem is fixed or not. This should create a hardfork, but fortunately the fork the older client is on should never be able to go past block 123,999.

Does anyone have any suggestions? We are considering putting the wallet for download and getting pools to use it and see if it works.

I can test it on my pool with my GPU's

spiffcow

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: MCR on February 21, 2014, 06:23:57 AM

Quote from: HuuHachu on February 21, 2014, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

MRC comes from TIX. We have found the proof-of-stake checkpoint and removed it. We now face the problem of testing if the problem is fixed or not. This should create a hardfork, but fortunately the fork the older client is on should never be able to go past block 123,999.

Does anyone have any suggestions? We are considering putting the wallet for download and getting pools to use it and see if it works.

Put it up for download. Launch 2.0!

MCR

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: HuuHachu on February 21, 2014, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

MRC comes from TIX. We have found the proof-of-stake checkpoint and removed it. We now face the problem of testing if the problem is fixed or not. This should create a hardfork, but fortunately the fork the older client is on should never be able to go past block 123,999.

Does anyone have any suggestions? We are considering putting the wallet for download and getting pools to use it and see if it works.

Mr.V

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: freshmeat on February 21, 2014, 06:10:20 AM

So u think we have to sell now before people realise the bug ?

i have 50 million , what should i do ? keep or dump

none of the above use it to buy my 7950 vapor x!!! atleast if the coin crashed you'll still have a nice gpu Wink

SkyValeey

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: freshmeat on February 21, 2014, 06:10:20 AM

So u think we have to sell now before people realise the bug ?

i have 50 million , what should i do ? keep or dump

Quote from: jcarl987 on February 21, 2014, 06:05:40 AM

I'll be selling as soon as I'm able. Price on Mintpal is going up, hopefully they won't realise there was a problem Cheesy

Do not sell:) MRC will be just like Mintcoin price soon.
Bug will be fixed. Do not get FUD in your mind.
Stay calm and stay tuned, hold and wait few days, better sell at 10-12 than sell at 5 Cool

freshmeat

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

So u think we have to sell now before people realise the bug ?

i have 50 million , what should i do ? keep or dump

lexa

full member

Activity: 120

Merit: 100

Quote from: HuuHachu on February 21, 2014, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in PPC because PPC already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for the PPC blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

(will look into the PPC code in the meantime)

EDIT: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

Yeah, removing ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu ) line should fix the issue

KaevurMati

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: HuuHachu on February 21, 2014, 06:03:48 AM

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in PPC because PPC already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for the PPC blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

(will look into the PPC code in the meantime)

Google found the same line from TIX source, so this is probably the cause.
https://github.com/LotteryTickets/LotteryTickets/blob/master/src/kernel.cpp

jcarl987

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

I'll be selling as soon as I'm able. Price on Mintpal is going up, hopefully they won't realise there was a problem Cheesy

HuuHachu

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: lexa on February 21, 2014, 05:51:00 AM

Kernel.cpp Line 20

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic
static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0x0e00670bu )
   ( 124000, 0xe791f02cu )

   ;

It looks like block 124000 is looking for 0xa4251ce5b54ee576 but got 0xe791f02cu in checkpoints array.

I was also looking into this ...
My understanding is that the second checkpoint (124000) should not be set at all yet.

It was most probably in the coin MRC was cloned from, because this coin already went over block 124000. But the value is probably valid for this coin blockchain, not for MRC.

Anyone can confirm ?

EDIT1: anyway, it clearly is not required also because proof-of-stake is not enabled yet in MRC ... it should kick in only after one full year (60*60*24*365 seconds, as stated in main.cpp)

EDIT2: the 124000 value does not come from the PPC code (they have other checkpoints for the proof of stake, but not this one). From which coin was MRC cloned ? This value most probably comes from that ancestor.

Topic: [ANN] microCoin MRC - alcurEX - Scrypt-Jane - nFactor - page 125. (Read 374702 times)