No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation,
Here's what Brian Kelly says about regulation:
"The New York State Department of Financial Services took the first step toward developing these rules this week, with the announcement of a BitLicense. Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky has taken the lead in regulating digital currency businesses with the goal of protecting consumers while fostering innovation. This was the right move at the right time."
Now Erik Vorhees' take on the same legislation, a well-respected member of the bitcoin community:
"The concern is essentially that any user of any Bitcoin service would have to be entered into all sorts of databases with their name and personal information, like where they live, what they look like, what nationality they are — probably scans of their passport or driver’s license. And so this is all just a bunch of personal information that other people have no business knowing. And if the government wants to have private information about people, they need to make a case that that person is at least a suspect of a crime, I would think. They shouldn’t be able to just require everyone’s information just because they write it on paper. So that was my main concern — there are other concerns, but that was kind of the thrust of my piece."
http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/
HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.
Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.
Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.
That's exactly what it means, because in this case it doesn't have to be inevitable. He is just brainwashing people into accepting a new form of slavery by the financial system so Wall Street can continue its dominant position as Earth's Overlords.
Some more from Brian Kelly's original article:
"The open-source nature of digital currencies provides a built-in self-regulatory mechanism, but that mechanism does not protect against human greed."
And Wall Street DOES?
??!!! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.Some regulation is good, too many scams in crypto. Of course because of the nature of crypto, there will always be an unregulated exchange or coin. As I have said numerous times. So your argument is pretty much pathetic.
go away
there's good times ahead for this coin. 
