Author

Topic: [ANN] [NAUT] Nautiluscoin - First Coin w/Stabilization Fund - Digishield - page 211. (Read 901856 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.

How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used.

You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not.

So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing.  Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one.......

It's old and tired, and radical and newbish Smiley


You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down."

I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class.

And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)

Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there.

not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin.

I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in.


i still think his rushing in with his opinion(the guy is so full of himself where he thinks he can't be wrong) pieces and it will bite him in the ass (but i could be wrong) i do not think he's been long enough into crypto and he's not aware how influential a little comment let alone an article can be in this space . but hey that is just my opinion. anyway where is our POS i want to start staking Smiley

I agree he has to tread very carefully but he's done OK so far. I doubt POS will be long but I'm not worried at this price, looks like accumulation across exchanges now.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)

Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there.

not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin.

I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in.


i still think his rushing in with his opinion(the guy is so full of himself where he thinks he can't be wrong) pieces and it will bite him in the ass (but i could be wrong) i do not think he's been long enough into crypto and he's not aware how influential a little comment let alone an article can be in this space . but hey that is just my opinion. anyway where is our POS i want to start staking Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)

Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there.

not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin.

I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
anyway i shouldn't be talking about other coins here, my order filled on cryptsy well one of them, next one is much lower from where it's at now but you never know
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)

Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there.

not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)

Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.

PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
legendary
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003

I don't know why you would want to ignore such obvious warning signs. I know not everyone is being as hard-headed as you are. You must be in quite deep with the NAUT.

Well fair warning, once the rest of cryptoland understands Brian Kelly's true intentions, NAUT is going to drop like a rock.

Man....do you have any idea how borring you are? Who do you think you are? Jesus Christ or maybe GOD himself? I think you are just a frustrated loner that has no friends, no girlfriend...maybe not even a dog, that wants you to walk him in the park.

Please get a life AND let other people life their life of choose
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
So  how  about that moolah  taking over  mintpal's news.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
Will the multipool development be paid for by the NSF or do we need to organize a bounty? That's presuming someone doesn't want to run their own.
full member
Activity: 534
Merit: 100
But the regulation Brian Kelly is asking for will be written by lobbyists on behalf of the financial industry, and they will write the rules to their advantage and to the disadvantage of everybody else.
How do you know? You throw wild accusations, personal opinions and ad hominems around without a shred of evidence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10769041/The-US-is-an-oligarchy-study-concludes.html

The masses haven't had an effect on American public policy in the last 40 years. We are in effect already a corporate oligopoly.

How could you assume that bitcoin regulation wouldn't be written in the banks favor? That just seems incredibly naive by now.
Thanks Smiley I assumed you were just guessing, and you just confirmed it. I'll be ignoring you from now on.

I don't know why you would want to ignore such obvious warning signs. I know not everyone is being as hard-headed as you are. You must be in quite deep with the NAUT.

Well fair warning, once the rest of cryptoland understands Brian Kelly's true intentions, NAUT is going to drop like a rock.

Didn't you say you were going to create your own thread? you seem passionate about this. You could call it "BK - THE EVIL THAT KILLED CRYPTO" - you can passionately discuss it there until the till the cows come home, or until you get a visit from BK's legal team Wink




 
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.

How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used.

You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not.

So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing.  Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one.......

It's old and tired, and radical and newbish Smiley
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
By the way, BK - do you feel comfortable sharing the timetable that Blocktech has given you (if they have!) on the latest updates? I know you said you don't want to give specific dates, but would be fun to hear how things are progressing Smiley

+1

Also I was wondering (obviously given the benefit of hindsight), would it have been better to implement POS on a brand new blockchain and just move the coins over. Might have been done by now.

Edit: By move I meant swap Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
But the regulation Brian Kelly is asking for will be written by lobbyists on behalf of the financial industry, and they will write the rules to their advantage and to the disadvantage of everybody else.
How do you know? You throw wild accusations, personal opinions and ad hominems around without a shred of evidence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10769041/The-US-is-an-oligarchy-study-concludes.html

The masses haven't had an effect on American public policy in the last 40 years. We are in effect already a corporate oligopoly.

How could you assume that bitcoin regulation wouldn't be written in the banks favor? That just seems incredibly naive by now.
Thanks Smiley I assumed you were just guessing, and you just confirmed it. I'll be ignoring you from now on.

I don't know why you would want to ignore such obvious warning signs. I know not everyone is being as hard-headed as you are. You must be in quite deep with the NAUT.

Well fair warning, once the rest of cryptoland understands Brian Kelly's true intentions, NAUT is going to drop like a rock.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
But the regulation Brian Kelly is asking for will be written by lobbyists on behalf of the financial industry, and they will write the rules to their advantage and to the disadvantage of everybody else.
How do you know? You throw wild accusations, personal opinions and ad hominems around without a shred of evidence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10769041/The-US-is-an-oligarchy-study-concludes.html

The masses haven't had an effect on American public policy in the last 40 years. We are in effect already a corporate oligopoly.

How could you assume that bitcoin regulation wouldn't be written in the banks favor? That just seems incredibly naive by now.
Thanks Smiley I assumed you were just guessing, and you just confirmed it. I'll be ignoring you from now on.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
But the regulation Brian Kelly is asking for will be written by lobbyists on behalf of the financial industry, and they will write the rules to their advantage and to the disadvantage of everybody else.
How do you know? You throw wild accusations, personal opinions and ad hominems around without a shred of evidence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10769041/The-US-is-an-oligarchy-study-concludes.html

The masses haven't had an effect on American public policy in the last 40 years. We are in effect already a corporate oligopoly.

How could you assume that bitcoin regulation wouldn't be written in the banks favor? That just seems incredibly naive by now.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114

It's time for the technology -and currency- to serve the people, not the bandits. Welcome regulation, even if it is already quite late. Regulation, for lack of a better word, is indeed GOOD.

I disagree. Your entire dissertation doesn't change the fact that there currently exists greater disparity in wealth across the planet than ever before. Ergo, financial regulation has failed.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
I hope moolah add fiat pairs to mintpal.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
But the regulation Brian Kelly is asking for will be written by lobbyists on behalf of the financial industry, and they will write the rules to their advantage and to the disadvantage of everybody else.
How do you know? You throw wild accusations, personal opinions and ad hominems around without a shred of evidence.


im surprised you havent ignored nutildah yet, i would recommend it as the last few post by this clearly unintellegent person have been going around in circles not getting anywhere. Its sparking bs conversation and it just needs to stop, try not to reply to nutildah just ignore everything said by this user and you'll have a good day =)


So how about that moolah taking over mintpal news.

Great stuff imo
Yeah, I guess you have a point Smiley

As for the Moolah taking over Mintpal, I'm not sure how to feel about that to be honest. Hopefully it'll turn out to be a good thing, especially since BK and Moolah have been talking about a partnership!

Exactly in what way can the Moola-Mintpal be "good"? A good merger is the one where the synergies between the merging companies produces benefits to the acquiring one AND BOTH COMPANIES' CUSTOMERS. None of that applies here: Mintpal is a broken exchange, only saved from bankruptcy by the VRC  devs -who were forced to save it to save themselves and their coin-. This will be, best case scenario, a wahsing up the face to try and convince traders that the flaws in security of the past will be taken care off... which people may or may not want to believe and, ion any case, will not benefit them at all. Any integration that they may offer is already widely and freely available at Cryptsy, so no advantages whatsoever for customer. For Moolah? probably just another bad investment to try to benefit of "having a profitable exchange" that MintPal is far from being currently. And one they have, obviously, bought on the cheap, to boot.

There's no possible outcome in this merger that can even remotely benefit either crypto or the customers. None whatsoever.
No, they did state that they're going to hire a security firm to do a third party security audit.
Jump to: