I like debate, but criticizing ANON coins when we are still developing our own anon is likely to attract UNWELCOME CRITICS who could invite sabotage. At this point in time, we need help, not sabotage.
If the devs think this is off topic, they might as well say so and let papa_lazarou provide another link, but he is not criticizing.
He is defending monero because of a statement made about it on this thread. Surely this is relevant, and I for one would like to hear about its anon features.
I don't see how any of this would lead to sabotage. We would gladly be discussing the NAV implementation of anon instead had we heard anything at all about its progress! (cheap shot, I know
)I mean, if we start arguing about monero anon, then some critic is going to FUD this coin, then all the FUD will scare away newbies and potential investors. This is why we need to be careful now and be more focused on our own progress.
@GREEDYJOHN
I will step back from the discussion now. But I will step in and debunk any FUD about *The Coin I Cannot Mention*
@bspus
If you'd like to you can hop over the thread of *The Coin I Cannot Mention* and ask your questions. I'm sure you'll be welcome.
PS: I own some thousands NAV I bought a while ago and at a way higher price than they are now. Does that mean I have to be neurotic about it? No it doesn't. Cheers.
