Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 448. (Read 2085654 times)

Hay David - Great to see you back!

What's up guys ? hash are you still here ? so damn long time man, i wonder why are you still here ?
NAV is going back to 200-300 level, i know it.

Obviously you don't follow the richlist. ...so your comment looks rather silly   for your 2nd post.

We are all experience traders and experienced on this forum since July  2014. The NavajoCoin Development Team know HaShForce101 can handle the mud at this critical time. While the others run and hide I know Soopy,  Pakage & Shahim will deliver the project 0 doubt.

We have a strong community with members like Remy 5 who fixed the Linux Wallet / Sync Fix which got us to Cryptsy.

A special note to the Navajocoin Development Team.  I hope the team acknowledges the commitment and Patience many have shown in the past months and the mud slinging that may come whilst you guys finish this project that we will need to handle on this forum. 

HaShForce101

I misrepresent nothing .. here u go ,,ive commented on this in the past myself .


Did you miss my continual questions about where is shahim and pakage? Where is the videos from the "Taipei event".

I can post a list of stuff that may or may not have been done too and add the Nav logo....

ANSWER THIS QUESTION: Where the f*ck is the web wallet? (Reaches into ass) oh here it is.....

Stop being a c*nt! your just going to dump and run off again like you did last time. I wish i did what you did and sold all my nav at 4500 like you did after telling everyone you were here for the long haul. I still have ALL my nav and thought these guys would actually eventually deliver something. Wish i had sold like you though now.
[/quote]

Would just like to echo Ginger Ninja's appreciation for all the effort remy_5 has (and continues) to put in on both the staking issue and helping out community members.  It speaks volumes on his/her character.

ok. gonna do this. thx for the fast reply

Long ago someone had already happened, but I do not remember the detail.

Check if you have enough free space on the system disk, and you have enough free memory.
If necessary, move the file debug.log, if it has reached considerable size.

As an interim measure there is an option that temporarily inhibits the activities of staking.
You can put it on the command line of the wallet: -staking=0
or on a new line in its .conf: staking=0

If the above helps, and your wallet.dat reached considerable size, maybe it's time to think of a
migration of your coins to a wallet.dat brand new.

Obviously then remember to remove the option anti staking.

Nice try, but do not correspond to reality.

He \ She \ It was active both before and after, and has maintained roughly
the same time offset until I checked a few hours ago.

Here is the graph of the Pos-Diff and the interval between the blocks.



As you can note the event linked to the whale took place many days ago,
while the new increase in PosDiff started on Sunday.

For the record, the block 2102401 was generated at 2015-10-18 11:48:10 GMT.


 

Curious, I just tried sending coins via anon to a couple of exchanges and both times indicated anon-node not available.

Then tried to send normally, amount deducted from my balance but not a single confirmation.  Will update if I manage to figure anything out on my end.

*Looks like 1 of my 3 deposits has just hit bittrex.  Feeling a little better.  Will update if/when other 2 deposits hit.
**Looks like deposit 2 of 3 has just hit cryptsy.  Still not a single confirmation on my first transfer yet
***All three deposits showed up

hi,

my wallet is pretty unresponsive... anyone observing the same issue? any idea what to do? it freezes anytime i try to unlock or send some coins.... is it the huge blockchain?

could someone help?


thx in advance

Hey Remy, thanks for your continued great information. I for one really appreciate it.

Is it possible that "our whale" restarted his wallet at the same time we entered our 3rd year?

Bingo! This is main reason.

Since block 2102401, what was assumed to be the first block of the third year,
it began operating a new rate of reward, which is now only 5%.

So the value of the stake grows much, much more slowly than before and in
a more linear way. And that in itself is enough to justify your observations.

About the fix, if you have not changed your code, or updated program of wallet,
then obviously there is no fix in action.
As I see, the secondary triggers reasons, there are still all, the little group of
addresses that produce blocks in the future, continue in their slip forward.
(It was the so-called group A of the little experiment a few weeks ago).

Other indirect reasons, are internal to the code and are somewhat common to
all POS coins.

The substantial improvement that's been around the 2015/10/10, is due to some
circumstances "environmental".
Our "whale", has probably restarted his wallet, and its new time-offset is
now very close to zero, this has as it were, shifted the center of mass of
the times in a more favorable position.

In addition, after the re-adjustment of its groups of coins after the change
of address, the whale has returned to produce blocks with great frequency,
and thanks to its "weight", and the low Diff, he has produced very long chains
of consecutive blocks, also 15 blocks in a row.

Normally this would be very unpleasant, but in this case, the blocks produced
from the same source did not have large changes of time back and forth,
and not to have negative intervals gave way at  PosDiff to rise a little,
pushing the block interval to 12-15 second circa, finally.

Instead, the rise of PosDiff of the last few hours, is another indirect effect
of the change of interest.

There is more to say, for example on how to re-optimize the size of the blocks,
but it's late and it's better to know first what are the intentions of the DevTeam.

Happy New Year!  

Nice to know that you are on line every day, and read the email.

This event was to be expected, and it was up to the DevTeam warn in advance
the forum of what could happen.

Keep informed the investors, beyond any technical problem there might be,
would be seen as a sign of seriousness.

WHY MESSAGE DELETED ?!
I JUST TOLD THE TRUTH

"
marketcap only 104k$ (398btc)..
wtf ...  
 nav is not in the top 100 lol...
"

What sort of BS comment is this. Ginger commented on cheerleading haha. Not about trust. Don't you see the edit after 30 seconds of making the original post. Yeah it was a week ago. But it's still circulating. I  didn't mind Gingers comments to be honest. His clearly frustrated which I can understand. We are all in the same position. So don't come on here trying to discredit me and misrepresenting what another member has said.

If this cheerleader ever comes on this forum and starts complaining you will see this Cryptocoin go to 20 sats. Im the one that highlighted the community towards Remy 5. I'm completely happy with progress and im hoping when the good days start to come we are hit with a Tornado of great news that gives an upward momentum. The current sell wall is staked with sell orders and that going to need 65BTC to crack. Hopefully one day we all  open a bottle of beer and we all celebrate the crap out of this thing. I know this team well enough to know what is going on. So stop targeting people and stick to the facts.

How on earth do you expect us to believe any of this? It's been going on like this for the past 3 maybe 4 months? Instead of making these constant 'promises', how about providing us with a GitHub source where development can actually be followed? You're right, there's none.. Prove me wrong, please!

I'm online everyday, the fact that I'm not logging in doesn't mean I'm not around.
I'm checking forum everyday, logging in if I need to post or check message box (getting email notifications).
- Just to clarify.

We're working on fixing block timing issues, shahim and soopy will post an update on that once they get it sorted out
Please stay tuned, we're working behind the scenes
(I know - You wish it would take less time, but oh well - we're the ones actually working and covering all costs, so perhaps at least have patience if You can't help improve the coin)
Cheers

~ Strugg

Unfortunately I'm not entirely convinced any sort of 'fix' was actually implemented.  If what Remy_5 indicated earlier is true regarding nav having it's 3rd birthday doesn't the PoS block reward get cut in half at that point?  That coupled with the recent network weight increase might explain the major delta we are all experiencing on staked wallets at this point.

Definitely would love to hear remys analysis of the situation.

Just my 2 satoshi's worth.

*Also, I have a question for soopy or pakage, if getbalance function is currently depreciated on nav-qt what function would I use in lieu of it?  

can you just chill ? like this you are not doing nothing ok to your investment,to many wannabe millionaire,have patience!we speak about altcoins here!

we speak about a project with 0 IPO and we speak about some devs that are working free time so just shut up