Author

Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 634. (Read 2085654 times)

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
Yeah WTB cheap NAV? 3000-3500 range 17 BTC, zuhahahah, total 32 BTC, run run run buy....
Prices should rise, because weak hands have been shaken out.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Can some one update the main page and add alcurex in the exchanges.  there is at least 6 btc buy support..  and they added the nav annon wallet right away. show some support



https://alcurex.org/index.php/crypto/market?pair=nav_btc

0.00002620    14523.00000000    0.38050260
0.00002600    4521.00000000    0.11754600
0.00002582    6321.00000000    0.16320822
0.00002500    3214.00000000    0.08035000
0.00002480    4563.00000000    0.11316240
0.00002430    21453.00000000    0.52130790
0.00002400    45632.00000000    1.09516800
0.00002354    32541.00000000    0.76601514
0.00002200    3214.00000000    0.07070800
0.00002190    81018.22740731    1.77429918
0.00001900    55550.00000000    1.05545000




THANK YOU !!!


edit: hah i see its added already... sorry
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
NAV is the best choice for smart buyer great future coming just few days to go the mooon,
still chance to get cheap NAV, once Anon release price will to the moon.
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Good News
We are on the http://syncbit.io/
Create your page,your group,invite friends for videochat,tips,games
Please retweet
https://twitter.com/B1bl3/status/579745391387774977
hero member
Activity: 851
Merit: 1000
Do You Even Onion Bro?
The future begins tomorrow Navajo will b  the best investment you can make....... buy now cause Monday is the day that NAVAJO GOES UP AND UP......WE ARE IN FOR A WILD RIDE OF YOUR LIFE  SO JOIN THE WINING TEAM GET YOURS TODAY AND HOLD ON TO THOSE COINS ....LESS THEM 24 HOURS AND THIS IT GUY'S THE ROCKET IS ABOUT TO LIFT OFF ....TOMORROW IT NAVAJO DAY IT WILL B A DAY TO REMEMBER THAT NAVAJO BECAME NUMBER 1....................................
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Can some one update the main page and add alcurex in the exchanges.  there is at least 6 btc buy support..  and they added the nav annon wallet right away. show some support



https://alcurex.org/index.php/crypto/market?pair=nav_btc

0.00002620    14523.00000000    0.38050260
0.00002600    4521.00000000    0.11754600
0.00002582    6321.00000000    0.16320822
0.00002500    3214.00000000    0.08035000
0.00002480    4563.00000000    0.11316240
0.00002430    21453.00000000    0.52130790
0.00002400    45632.00000000    1.09516800
0.00002354    32541.00000000    0.76601514
0.00002200    3214.00000000    0.07070800
0.00002190    81018.22740731    1.77429918
0.00001900    55550.00000000    1.05545000


edit: hah i see its added already... sorry
full member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 120
Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards
remy I ask him and he say it is around 30mb
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
NAV Coin [NAV]
https://twitter.com/navajocointalk/status/579694080919207937

Retweet please Wink
Stay Tuned Navajos!

Cheers
~ Strugg
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

If you happen to see Him, I have a technical curiosity to ask him, if possible I would
like to know how many megabytes occupied his wallet.dat.

It tends to increase with the use and with time, but I can not imagine what it can get.


I have read about that. mostely it is not the size, which is limiting the wallet, but it is the number of addresses kept in that wallet.

One time I accidently created 15000 addresses and the wallet grew to 200MB . the result has been an unusable wallet, because every action lasts soooo long.

So I thought, the wallet keeps the private keys for the addresses. Coins are inside the network and not stored in the wallet. So it does not matter, if I have one coin or 1000 coins, it does not change wallet size. ??

I read there is no real limit, the limit is set by the hardware processing the wallet. and of yourse the filesystem Cheesy

15000 ?? What a greedy guy!   Grin Grin Grin

Yes, the wallet keeps the private keys for the addresses, IIRC but also keeps
a track, a pointer or something (I should recheck the source) to private part
of database, which indicates all personal transactions received or made,
and txuo of coins available to be spent or stake.
This should be the part which the command repairwallet fix.

So the value of 1 coin or 1M coin, don't care, but 1 transaction or
100k TX have much impact.

I noticed this with the wallet of a failed coin which i use for some tests,
which with very few addresses, it was growing only for the stake and POW,
becoming as you yourself have said slow to die to handle.

Only after transferring all to a new wallet \ address, the new wallet is returned
to be usable... at least for a while.  Wink


Bye Bye
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 251
Official account of NAV Development Team
Here are some screen shots of the Anonymous system working on the main block chain for all the doubters.

1. New version of the wallet, you can clearly see that it is the NAV wallet, not the AnonBeta



2 .Here I am making a transaction from my unbuntu virtual box to my windows wallet



3. Showing the anon confirmation dialog



4. Confirmed transaction which is to one of the anon nodes rather than the address i set on the previous screen



5. Showing the transaction details where you can see the encrypted destination information listed under "transaction comment"



6. My windows wallet where i have received the split transactions (minus tx-fee) from the exit node





see yall on the moon
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Please Please Please DON'T FEED THE STUPID TROLLS.
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

And in any case, there should probably be a minimum amount sent in order for it to be accepted for processing, say 100 NAV depending on where the price is at the time.
I don't think processing transactions below $1 value makes sense.

Another question: How much (if any) extra burden does the anonymous system add to the actual blockchain?

Since the blockchain is already increasing fast, would it make sense to double the amount of time for a block?
Do we really need such fast blocks or do we need a more manageable chain instead?


I do not dispute the absolute value of the fee, but your question is well placed.
You might also want consider what is the value of a service in its own way unique,
but they are themes and economic theories, from which I remain happily out.  Grin

Regarding the cost and use of the server, and how the cost of the servers just
to handle anonymity, here I am in the dark, we have been told that there are 12
servers, but I have no idea how they are intended or functions are divided
and whether they can be aggregated.

But of one thing I am quite sure, even without anonymity, there are live
costs to sustain.

Maybe we can think as academic discussion about the impact of anonymous
transactions on blockchain, at least from what has been explained in the course
of the beta test.
Obviously there are only conjectures and maybe wrong, happy to be corrected by Dev.

Instead of a transaction "clear" and directed, a transaction anonymous undergoes
multiple steps, as well as a fragmentation, which depends not so much on the
absolute value, but the composition of the figure that you want to move.
For example, if in the best of cases, to send for example 100 or 1000 occupies
a space of 1, and send 1050 it occupies 2, to send 975 or 9999 it can occupy 10.

So without making too many calculations, an anonymous transaction, may impact
differently on blockchain, but may come to occupy as a dozen normal transactions.

Moreover, the fragmentation of which I said before, also involves another effect,
which will take place later, when the recipient will spend the money received.
Its new transaction will consist of many small piles, which occupy a little more
space than normal, making the size in bytes of the transaction a little heavier.
Nothing catastrophic, but it is a burden that will be imposed on the entire
block chain.

The idea of slowing the blockchain, I do not really like, in general I prefer a
fast coin instead of having to wait several minutes for confirmation.
In the case of many transactions at same time, may be cases of gridlock,
in which transactions are put in a long queue, dilating much the time needed
to final confirmation, a bit as happen with btc.

Instead a fast block time, would reduce these queues, and make time to
confirm acceptable.

There might be a compromise solution, a block time slow when there are no
transactions, but it can accelerate immediately, when there are new transactions
to be incorporated or to be confirmed.

It seems to me that some coins have attempted this, but I do not remember the
name, or if they have been successful, but I think it's a fairly difficult
to implement it here and now, especially so with a coin already in operation.

Bye Bye
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
NAV Coin [NAV]
More Caps Lock and different font sizes please...



Seriously though, gimme more and all this trash will get moderated.

Cheers Wink

~ Strugg
sr. member
Activity: 621
Merit: 250
Gentlemen! Evacuation! We sell Navajo. MESSAGE reportedly will not. There are problems.



ENGLISH ''I am happy to be here and to write here. Among the others the price dropped thanks to me as well. Due to this, i was able to buy a lot of more navs in the range 1200-2400, and that's what it is all about, to fool you so I can make more profit."



This is how fudders work. DONT BE NAIVE and dont sell your navs cause others earn on your stupidity


McVisual , next account of Papcio77 or the same sophisticated methods? hahahhahahahhaha
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Hehe , lets roll on the edge again. Curious to see ppl faces when the team release the wallet tomorrow, cheers Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
So f***ing tired of those aka truth warriors!

But the truth is, they are members of scam groups or in other words- pump groups.

Didn't you get enough in recent dumps?

Oh, yeah. You are so cool, and you will say the last word, when controlled dump will end and pump will start.

Screw you guys!!!
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Who believes in those micro sells that are happening in last hour or two?

Classic manipulation with trolls on rails.

Seriously, I am considering to make fake account to manipulate prace with fud. Who wants to sell me an account with at least Jr Member status, not plain Newbie?
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
>500 SATOSHI COMING SOON . RUN ....
> Activity: 7
> Newbie
xDD You can't even into good FUD
https://i.imgur.com/rEQgZ8m.gif
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
what has bob surplus created.. bunch of wanna be investors.  Come trolling as a group to push pressure down to collect as much coins as possible. so they can dump it x4 higher and pat them selves in the back..


silly trolls.
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002

sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR this address is currently empty. This is my friend bittrex trading wallet. I am trying to tell you this because if suddenly developer fix the bug it went to zero people started to get panic.


Congratulations to your friend, MobyDick, send him greetings from me. WinkWink

If you happen to see Him, I have a technical curiosity to ask him, if possible I would
like to know how many megabytes occupied his wallet.dat.

It tends to increase with the use and with time, but I can not imagine what it can get.

Bye Bye

Hi Remy,

I have read about that. mostely it is not the size, which is limiting the wallet, but it is the number of addresses kept in that wallet.

One time I accidently created 15000 addresses and the wallet grew to 200MB . the result has been an unusable wallet, because every action lasts soooo long.

So I thought, the wallet keeps the private keys for the addresses. Coins are inside the network and not stored in the wallet. So it does not matter, if I have one coin or 1000 coins, it does not change wallet size. ??

I read there is no real limit, the limit is set by the hardware processing the wallet. and of yourse the filesystem Cheesy
Jump to: