Author

Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 635. (Read 2085654 times)

hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR this address is currently empty. This is my friend bittrex trading wallet. I am trying to tell you this because if suddenly developer fix the bug it went to zero people started to get panic.


Congratulations to your friend, MobyDick, send him greetings from me. WinkWink

If you happen to see Him, I have a technical curiosity to ask him, if possible I would
like to know how many megabytes occupied his wallet.dat.

It tends to increase with the use and with time, but I can not imagine what it can get.

Bye Bye
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
is there a way to know how many wallets exists with 10k coins and above?

The question is uncertain.

We can not know exactly what has a single wallet, because normally a wallet
can hold up to 100 different addresses (sometimes more), although typically it
only uses a few addresses, and often for only a few transactions.

What we can do is count the addresses, and how much they hold.
Among the more than 90630 addresses that have been used at least once,
the addresses that have now more than 10K Nav are about 247, for a total
of about 56971K NAV, almost all the circulating Nav.

One interesting fact instead concerns the addresses that are less than 10K
and greater than 0, they are 2097, for a total 1110K Nav.

Of the latter, well 847 have not given any sign of activity in 2015, their total
is approximately 375K Nav, and the maximum value among them is the 8697 Nav,
but it is a rare case, are usually fractions of Nav, and the average value is 441 Nav.

Instead addresses that have produced stakes in the last week, were about 118.
The topstaker is still sfdzo3, with about 3312 blocks, but in the last 24
hours he has not produced anything, as we know it is migrating to bittrex.

The calculations are made partly manually just now, so error-prone, and constantly changing.

Bye Bye
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
Are exchanger's wallets stacking?


no they do not stake.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
Are exchanger's wallets stacking?
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
is there a way to know how many wallets exists with 10k coins and above?
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
It's whale playing, don't fall into their traps.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
cant think why there are people who are dumping at this point

There is lot of stupid people on this world. I am not surprised :p
weak hands are still being shaken out.
sr. member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 279
cant think why there are people who are dumping at this point

There is lot of stupid people on this world. I am not surprised :p
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
cant think why there are people who are dumping at this point
sr. member
Activity: 621
Merit: 250
Here are some screen shots of the Anonymous system working on the main block chain for all the doubters.

1. New version of the wallet, you can clearly see that it is the NAV wallet, not the AnonBeta



2 .Here I am making a transaction from my unbuntu virtual box to my windows wallet



3. Showing the anon confirmation dialog



4. Confirmed transaction which is to one of the anon nodes rather than the address i set on the previous screen



5. Showing the transaction details where you can see the encrypted destination information listed under "transaction comment"



6. My windows wallet where i have received the split transactions (minus tx-fee) from the exit node





see yall on the moon

Looks amazing!uhh less then 48h I cant wait!
legendary
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002

To grow the volume i think 5% is way to much it might be better to have a round of donations to run the servers for at least a month and keep the % as low as possible 1% preferably.


Does the cost (in server load) to process an anonymous transaction depend directly on the size of the amount sent? On any other things?
just trying to see if it would make sense to have a system of payment with an initial fixed cost and a variable % part, and perhaps even a maximum cost of transfer.
If I have 100000 NAV to send I might find the cost of 5000 way to steep and decide not to use it. If max cost is say 1000 NAV (just an example) it might make more sense

And in any case, there should probably be a minimum amount sent in order for it to be accepted for processing, say 100 NAV depending on where the price is at the time.
I don't think processing transactions below $1 value makes sense.

Another question: How much (if any) extra burden does the anonymous system add to the actual blockchain?

Since the blockchain is already increasing fast, would it make sense to double the amount of time for a block? Do we really need such fast blocks or do we need a more manageable chain instead?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
yo Shahim. thanks for answering.
Maybe bittrex transfer out from other storage wallet. They still store the coin at this wallet but hidden in gui for user to see. Smiley

exactly. they are not sending the coins, but simple move them from account to account to change the display! Otherwise every buy and sell also would be an transaction. But they take part immediately.

Nethertheless, I am monitoring this.
full member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 120
Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards
yo Shahim. thanks for answering.  
Maybe bittrex transfer out from other storage wallet. They still store the coin at this wallet but hidden in gui for user to see. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002

5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out.

Make sense?

The idea of fee which is based on percentage make sense, seem fair to me.


Good work Pakage!


Bye Bye

To grow the volume i think 5% is way to much it might be better to have a round of donations to run the servers for at least a month and keep the % as low as possible 1% preferably.



Hi,

I understand your thinking. we will discuss this inside the team and keep you all updated!

regards
shahim
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
Don't know which Government is buying up all the coins - American?

http://navajocoin.org/rich-list


Place   Address   Amount
1   sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR   8,100,100

that is logic buddy big whale always eat little fishes so that i am no wonder to see the amazing growth of top address in rich list, people are blind and never understand what is going to happen soon.

Went from 5,000,000 to 8,000,000 in 2 days! BIGGEST WOW Ever

sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR this address is currently empty. This is my friend bittrex trading wallet. I am trying to tell you this because if suddenly developer fix the bug it went to zero people started to get panic.


BTW Those top holder can try this by transfer all your coin to bittrex wallet and wait for it to appear in rich list then re transfer back to your desktop wallet. You will see that bittrex wallet is zero but still in rich list. Hope developer can fix this and few of the bittrex empty wallet will get eliminated from richlist
This is not a BUG, but many coin RICHLISTS always take some time to adjust, sometimes over 3 hours. However, block explorers are always up to date

John look at the pic address above. Block explorer seem to have not shown the out of bittrex wallet for some reason. My own bittrex address is there too. Developer need to take a look at it. I want to point out because later people will use this excuse to say the first wallet sell out  

Hi,

thank you very much for your effort! I will check this.  Even I don't know how bittrex work. But with the accounting inside the wallet. you move coins from from account to another, but still stay at the same address, cause there is no transaction when moving these coins. it is just to display coin amount.

regards
shahim
legendary
Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041

5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out.

Make sense?

The idea of fee which is based on percentage make sense, seem fair to me.


Good work Pakage!


Bye Bye

To grow the volume i think 5% is way to much it might be better to have a round of donations to run the servers for at least a month and keep the % as low as possible 1% preferably.

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000

NavajoCoin - All Eyes On US
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYtGl1dX5qI&feature=youtu.be 

There Looking at US!
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000




Navajocoin Asynchronous Encryption Technology

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10846094 - Anonymous system working on the main block chain

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
Thanks ninjaboon. Ill send you some coins when the Double encryption gets turned on the 23rd March Cheesy. Anonoumouly of course

oh yes, I remembered. thanks for that.
Jump to: