Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ** NEW SITE bitgem.pw ** BTG BitGem 0.4.9.ALPHA1 | COLORED COINS | FAUCET - page 51. (Read 147668 times)

full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
NEW  UPDATE 2

Quote
Win32 installer: version_0.4.1_UPDATE 2  bitgem-0.4.1-UPDATE2-win32-setup.exe  [dropbox]

Source: https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem (up to date). * UPDATED 24.05.13


Instructions for install  0.4.1_ UPDATE_2 :

1.- Desinstall 0.4.1
2.- delete into C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\BitGem all files except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf. A pervious backup of this directory is recommended.
3.- install 0.4.1_ UPDATE_2version.


CHANGELOG

0.4.1_UPDATE_2:

 * added checkpoints,
 * Fix reward: prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.



Could you provide an MD5 checksum of the windows-qt executable "you compiled" ?

Of course, sir.  Cheesy

This is the MD5SUM of win32 installer:
MD5SUM: c911d3f04236daeba491f38aa43fc109 bitgem-0.4.1-update2-win32-setup.exe
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
NEW  UPDATE 2

Quote
Win32 installer: version_0.4.1_UPDATE 2  bitgem-0.4.1-UPDATE2-win32-setup.exe  [dropbox]

Source: https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem (up to date). * UPDATED 24.05.13


Instructions for install  0.4.1_ UPDATE_2 :

1.- Desinstall 0.4.1
2.- delete into C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\BitGem all files except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf. A pervious backup of this directory is recommended.
3.- install 0.4.1_ UPDATE_2version.


CHANGELOG

0.4.1_UPDATE_2:

 * added checkpoints,
 * Fix reward: prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.



Could you provide an MD5 checksum of the windows-qt executable "you compiled" ?
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
yay the reward up'ed to 0.4 the last two blocks i found =D

whats with the old blocks rewarded with 3BTG -> still waiting on 31 to mature in a mentional amount of blocks...can they mature still at all, or are they lost?

Killa
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
ok, weird situation. I have two boxes, one Debian Linux, one windoze.

Before Update:
Windoze box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain
Linux box works perfectly.

After Update:
Windoze box works perfectly
Linux box refuses to connect, can not d/l blockchain


Steps I took to update Linux box:
1. rm -rf  bitgem
2. cd .bitgem
3. mv wallet.dat ../
4. mv bitgem.conf ../
5. cd
6. rm -rf .bitgem
7. mkdir .bitgem
8. mv bitgem.conf .bitgem/bitgem.conf
9. mv wallet.dat .bitgem/wallet.dat
10. git clone git://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.git
11. cd bitgem/src
12. make -f makefile.unix bitgemd USE_UPNP=-
13. ./bitgemd -daemon

Result:
Code:
root@vps:~/bitgem/src# ./bitgemd getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-8-g4203e80-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "moneysupply" : 0.00000000,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "0.0.0.0",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1369326517,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Any assistance is greatly appreciated...

I think this is more or less well done. However, if two bitgem installtions share the same IP, you shoud to provide to Linux one (if it was the last run) a peers.dat file.

My linux box and my windoze box use different ip's as the windoze box here is at my house and the linux box is a hosted VPS. All the other clents work fine, I have all the necessary ports open in iptables, I just don't understand what the problem is. Going to try the new update and see if it makes any difference somehow.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
If anyone is having troubles syncing remove all add nodes from your .conf file. Lots of people still on old clients
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.

thats really low  Angry

yes .75% of all gems for 5Ltc Ridiculous
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
this have active developer and no exchange add it
some bullshit coin with no Dev active and exc added it =.=
poor
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
NEW  UPDATE 2

Quote
Win32 installer: version_0.4.1_UPDATE 2  bitgem-0.4.1-UPDATE2-win32-setup.exe  [dropbox]

Source: https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem (up to date). * UPDATED 24.05.13


Instructions for install  0.4.1_ UPDATE_2 :

1.- Desinstall 0.4.1
2.- delete into C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\BitGem all files except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf. A pervious backup of this directory is recommended.
3.- install 0.4.1_ UPDATE_2version.


CHANGELOG

0.4.1_UPDATE_2:

 * added checkpoints,
 * Fix reward: prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.

full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
Thanks Balthazar, but it is an unlike scenario.

This commit https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/3b597f10df5fd60614ca65e31d1e2621af1f988d prevents arbitrary miners get invalid reward.

I will update client today.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358
It's good if you are user of modified client.
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
This "fix" allows a limited group of miners to generate blocks with a MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK (3 BTG) reward at any difficulty, using the modified client.

There are only two possible reasons of such change.
so it is good or bad?
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358
This "fix" allows a limited group of miners to generate blocks with a MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK (3 BTG) reward at any difficulty, using the modified client.
sr. member
Activity: 301
Merit: 260
FLO dev
https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/38da3efd377e3383954f36ddb2b676080f69f88c#L0R2071

Quote
-    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? (GetProofOfWorkReward(nBits) - vtx[0].GetMinFee() + MIN_TX_FEE) : 0))
+
+    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK : 0))

Bloody hell  Shocked

What's the implication of this?
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358
https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem/commit/38da3efd377e3383954f36ddb2b676080f69f88c#L0R2071

Quote
-    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? (GetProofOfWorkReward(nBits) - vtx[0].GetMinFee() + MIN_TX_FEE) : 0))
+
+    if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > (IsProofOfWork()? MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_WORK : 0))

Bloody hell  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
same here last reward 0.38375 took me 8 hours to get him....found yesterday evening when i started to run solo-mining an orphan with 0.37 as well .....that makes mining absolutly nonsense if the current price of these gem's does not increase hard now =(

It will just wait Wink
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
same here last reward 0.38375 took me 8 hours to get him....found yesterday evening when i started to run solo-mining an orphan with 0.37 as well .....that makes mining absolutly nonsense if the current price of these gem's does not increase hard now =(
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
Why the helll has the blocked reward changed to .32707 Bitgems? My last 2 bocks are only .32707?!?!?!?!?!
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.
Jajajajajajaj all are crazy! Do not sell BTG save
They have no fucking idea what they cost
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
what z the current trade rate per 100?

It's not on any exchanges yet except for google docs exchanges and the best offer there is 0.05 LTC, so 5 LTC per 100 BTG.
Jajajajajajaj all are crazy! Do not sell BTG save
Pages:
Jump to: