Topic: [ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔ - page 19. (Read 70018 times)
October 03, 2014, 02:56:33 PM
Barwizi, any update?
October 03, 2014, 01:10:50 PM
What does this mean? If this one person keeps pushing there will be none of what? I would like a response on Skype btw Barwizi.. I dont like being ignored.
It means, perhaps, that some relaxing needs to occur. I have been watching this coin all summer and while I don't understand the issues I see one major theme - a guy who is consistently working to make this thing work. I have watched you guys take my investment to -15x its value (not a GF holder). I still believe in this guy. He doesn't have help. Sure, it seems that he can't deliver in a 'timely fashion' what was promised but he seems to be steadily working towards it.
I'm not arguing that some people might not be entitled to answers but I think he means that he is working towards fixing everything and perhaps a bit more patience is more productive than constant demands.
I'm going back to the background (check my post history; I am not a shill and am doing well enough in crypto world *knock on wood* so please don't think I am here to favor...much less argue my impressions - Read - I won't reply)...
Well, I certainly understand your position. But from my position (GF shareholder) the perspective is much different. I have actually recieved ZERO dividends from NG and also was never formally included into any type of payment system for such dividends... Also, read Chocobos accounting of the miners.. etc.. and the fact that I proposed an idea to the community for me to try and make the miners profitable... over a dozen voted yes and Barwizi has since then ignored every single thing I have said to him.
October 03, 2014, 02:48:12 AM
What does this mean? If this one person keeps pushing there will be none of what? I would like a response on Skype btw Barwizi.. I dont like being ignored.
It means, perhaps, that some relaxing needs to occur. I have been watching this coin all summer and while I don't understand the issues I see one major theme - a guy who is consistently working to make this thing work. I have watched you guys take my investment to -15x its value (not a GF holder). I still believe in this guy. He doesn't have help. Sure, it seems that he can't deliver in a 'timely fashion' what was promised but he seems to be steadily working towards it.
I'm not arguing that some people might not be entitled to answers but I think he means that he is working towards fixing everything and perhaps a bit more patience is more productive than constant demands.
I'm going back to the background (check my post history; I am not a shill and am doing well enough in crypto world *knock on wood* so please don't think I am here to favor...much less argue my impressions - Read - I won't reply)...
It is all about keeping up appearances...
October 03, 2014, 02:46:55 AM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited.
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off)
Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap.
If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it?
keep pushing and there will be none. You've already crossed the line calling me a scammer, cracking a whip at me will do nothing to help your cause. It will simply push me to follow the advice "let it all go".
I rest my case. You are manipulating me in this way, I cannot ask, but you will not deliver unless people are pushing you, you appear to be willing to do the accounting, but appearance is void. You noticed I gave you time to make things right. We are waiting for 4 months now for any accounting. It was never given. If you were really were so concerned about what people think of you, you would do more effort to contradict the facts with proof. The fact is we did not get anything out of those 23 or more bitcoins, they are still with you and you are doing no effort at all to make that right. You are always good at keeping up the appearance of doing something, but in fact you do very little for NRS. It looks like it has become more of a burden to you then something you are passionate about. You are passionate about your new idea, Project X, but with the knowledge I have now, I would say that your interest for that project will remain until you have taken your money out from it and will be "sidetracked" by whatever it is in about 2 months time.
October 02, 2014, 10:21:59 PM
What does this mean? If this one person keeps pushing there will be none of what? I would like a response on Skype btw Barwizi.. I dont like being ignored.
It means, perhaps, that some relaxing needs to occur. I have been watching this coin all summer and while I don't understand the issues I see one major theme - a guy who is consistently working to make this thing work. I have watched you guys take my investment to -15x its value (not a GF holder). I still believe in this guy. He doesn't have help. Sure, it seems that he can't deliver in a 'timely fashion' what was promised but he seems to be steadily working towards it.
I'm not arguing that some people might not be entitled to answers but I think he means that he is working towards fixing everything and perhaps a bit more patience is more productive than constant demands.
I'm going back to the background (check my post history; I am not a shill and am doing well enough in crypto world *knock on wood* so please don't think I am here to favor...much less argue my impressions - Read - I won't reply)...
October 02, 2014, 10:06:10 PM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited.
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off)
Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap.
If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it?
keep pushing and there will be none. You've already crossed the line calling me a scammer, cracking a whip at me will do nothing to help your cause. It will simply push me to follow the advice "let it all go".
What does this mean? If this one person keeps pushing there will be none of what? I would like a response on Skype btw Barwizi.. I dont like being ignored.
October 02, 2014, 02:34:21 PM
v0.2.3.1-beta is the last one? Right?
Anyone sync the wallet ?
Anyone sync the wallet ?
Yes, Barwizi will release an update probably tomorrow, meanwhile wallet is out of sync
October 02, 2014, 01:01:10 PM
v0.2.3.1-beta is the last one? Right?
Anyone sync the wallet ?
Anyone sync the wallet ?
October 02, 2014, 12:48:37 PM
has anybody peers?
October 02, 2014, 11:11:35 AM
BARWIZI IS A SCAMMER! BEWARE!!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-scam-warning-barwizi-nrsnrbnoirgroupproject-x-789290
[MOD NOTE: Edited text size and removed off-topic image]
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-scam-warning-barwizi-nrsnrbnoirgroupproject-x-789290
[MOD NOTE: Edited text size and removed off-topic image]
October 02, 2014, 07:17:20 AM
October 02, 2014, 04:50:23 AM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited.
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off)
Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap.
If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it?
keep pushing and there will be none. You've already crossed the line calling me a scammer, cracking a whip at me will do nothing to help your cause. It will simply push me to follow the advice "let it all go".
October 02, 2014, 03:23:57 AM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited.
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off)
Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap.
If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it?
September 30, 2014, 09:59:56 PM
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off
NO.
A VPS running a NRS block explorer, much like:
http://nrs.argakiig.us/
That is on the new chain. So when I go "NoirSharesd getinfo" and it says I'm on block 352, I can look at that block explorer, and go "oh, wait a minute, the block explorer is at block 4205, I'm way off"
Similarly, if I hit a lotto block of 2222 reward, I want to check to see that the block explorer website shows it's mine also..
September 30, 2014, 02:41:48 PM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited.
You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off)
Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X
As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap.
September 30, 2014, 12:13:43 PM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented.
BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain.
The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap.
September 30, 2014, 11:33:16 AM
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
September 28, 2014, 10:02:05 PM
I think I have some problem.
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
You shouldn't have to dump any keys to switch to the new NRS chain. Just use your old wallet file as though it were the wallet for the new chain. (Be sure to back it up first, though.)
Thanks.
I just replaced old wallet.dat to new one.
However, I found this error and qt wallet didn't run.
"Warning : error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correcly, but transaction data or address book entries might be missing or incorrect."
since i have fixed inter-client connectivity that wont be an issue. For now i am just trying to test every possible scenario with transactions to ensure they dont cause a hang.
September 28, 2014, 12:08:23 PM
I think I have some problem.
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
Do you have a passphrase on your wallet that was used to encrypt it? If so, this is the kind of error message that will be displayed if you do not unlock it first.
(it always acts like it does not have the private key when the wallet is locked)
To unlock the wallet use:
walletpassphrase
Then you can dump your private key
(The 600 means 600 seconds or 10 minutes)
September 28, 2014, 03:02:44 AM
I think I have some problem.
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
You shouldn't have to dump any keys to switch to the new NRS chain. Just use your old wallet file as though it were the wallet for the new chain. (Be sure to back it up first, though.)
Thanks.
I just replaced old wallet.dat to new one.
However, I found this error and qt wallet didn't run.
"Warning : error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correcly, but transaction data or address book entries might be missing or incorrect."
Jump to: