Topic: [ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔ - page 17. (Read 69978 times)

Hi guys!
There is a month past after the snapshot (9\9\2014).
Any news on the new blockchain? Can't find any info.
How can I get my new NRS?

keep it up barwizi I have been watching NRS since it started you are the most reliable dev.
 

There is a certain way you talk Barwizi in previous posts, that either makes you a sadist, or a legitimate person who believes in karma.

I'm going for the latter.

I continue to believe in your intentions, and if in the end I'm at fault for that, I'm willing to take that risk infront of everyone reading this forum.

There is certain words that you use, and phrases that lead me to believe your a genuine human being, with real intentions, and for that I'm willing to go the extra mile.

I know times are tough cryptocurrency wise, and sketchy, but thanks for coming through with the code when you upload it.

Thanks again
Toldy.

I usually keep my personal affairs just that , however, for those who do know, I have been on assignment for a year now and had returned home for a much needed visit as well as to fight reassignment into a war zone. That's completed so I'm going back now, the travel was unavoidable.

I never stopped working and share you pov, we are late, very.

Even now I'm coding on my tablet just to push things through. I probably will upload two versions of the code by end of day. One has PoS and the other does not. Whichever is most stable will become the active one.

Thanks.

As you can understand, tensions are high right now.  I don't know why you're travelling so much but that's your personal issue I guess.

What I can tell you is that the time is now to get this underway before NoirShares becomes a distant memory and no chance of re-launching a new chain. We're way overdue of recouping the investor following that has been here to this point.  There are hundreds of people with coins stuck in the snapshot. They are losing interest at an alarming rate day-by-day.

So please do it the moment you have a chance.  We're at the fork in the road where NRS either lives or becomes permanent dust.

Too many other altcoin solutions are grabbing attention and making waves on a daily basis. We have to realize that we no longer have time to spare.

We also need to address the GF fund investors after the NRS 2.0 chain is alive and well as you well know.

This is completely fixable, with enough effort and energy by people willing to help.

I'll do so in an airport if I can, meantime I am working on trying a CCoinsview implementation. As well as LevelDB. There are two versions, one with PoS and one pure PoW. I'll have to pick the more stable one.

Can you upload the current source to mega download or something (instead of git) in a zip, with a comment of where it is broken in a readme.txt and let us have a crack at it?

I'd like to run it on some test nodes and fill the debug.log with verbose commenting and see if I can spot where the problem lies and possibly write a routine to fix it.

The reason I'm asking you to do this in public is two fold:

a) It lays legitimacy to the situation and allows everyone in here the same opportunity

b) We might get more people trying to fix it

Don't bother, he stole my and lazj99's BTC and removed us from the GF for exposing his scam.

Every time you talk to him, he will only derail the conversation into some dumb blame game back at you.

The other people you argue with that support his scam are most likely sock puppets created by him.

I already played this game with him during the summer and received no real response from him.

Now you see he wants to meet someone in London, he will use his sock puppet to make it seem like he is actually going to meet someone to look like this whole scam is legit.

That's been his pattern for months now: Announce something -> use sock puppet to seem legit -> drag more people into this scam -> rinse and repeat.

Anyone here live in London? I'll be there early tomorrow , staying two days.

I don't see you as my employee, you are so far from the truth. I see you as a person that keeps some money from a group, the GF holders, and has a responsibility to that group. I also get tired of you telling me I piss you off, because you have the same effect on me. You have taken liberties with the money of the GF. Anyway, if you like to demonize me so that you will look better, be my guest. I am sure that people with some common sense will be able to distinguish truth from lies.

Your previous statements seem to imply you see me as your employee , seeing how you wish to dictate my time useage. Quite plainly , you are bullshitting because any dev/debugger would have understood the problem from my description and if you had a solution you would have stated it. You need to back off and let me work.

You have said nothing constructive short of pissing me off and making assumptions and taking liberties. If you knew half of what needs to b done you would have done it yourself.

So thanks but no thanks, I do not need or require an armchair general or a clueless commentator.

Find something to do with your time and check back in a few days.

Not much response, most have never modified the places I have so I'm trying an alternative that seems to cover that situation. Coding on a laptop is not fun.

I am able to help with debugging if I get more than 3 days to test. And be sure I can give constructive information. But like a developer needs time to develop, a debugger needs to have time to test. Last time the code of the alpha release was put on github around 24 hours before release of the Windows client, and the github source was even not up to date (was obviously different from the windows client). Nothing was working like it should. I think at that time I have mentioned that the reason why Lotto was not working was because there was no reference to it in the code. I did not go into much detail there, because I was almost sure Barwizi knew that it was not working yet and why. It was there in the GUI, but let me put it like this, I can make wonderful GUIs which seem to have lots of functions in it, but if there is nothing behind it it won't work. It is like selling a Tesla without engine, if you turn the key it won't start. I never got the chance to test Lotto when the blockchain was reset, because transactions failed and it got stuck very soon in the blockchain. The strange thing is that the blockchain seemed to have worked somehow till then. I stopped looking over the code until Barwizi is ready with this problem.
I am very curious to which developers he has asked for help, and if there is a bounty planned for them.

The new NRS 2.0 wallet has one last bug before being released, it's one complex line of code that is difficult for Barwizi to figure out on his own. So he called in help from other coin developers to ask them their opinion on how to fix it.

This is causing a bigger delay because he is waiting on other people.  Hopefully Barwizi will mention if he has heard back from anyone yet, or if he is still stuck. 

Regarding the BOLD comment (by me)... wanting does not help. Debugging and pointing parts of the code with some reasoning do!

Also saying just, "it doesn't work or it's not good enough..." - it's for the ones that don't know what to do with their money, and those, I am sorry.. can wait. =)

People sometimes loose more time fighting against a cause that could just be won by implementing alternative technologies and prove they are better and worth of their words.

Main property of evolution is not fighting... it's sharing!

I don't understand what's going on. 

That is his explanation afterwards. Did you miss that he is not working on the code right now? Because that is what I am reading in his message and that is what I am reacting at. Anyway, I am not going to defend my point of view here, I know I am not going to change your mind and I am fine with that.

Barwizi initially explained what was holding everything up:


To which Frigga77 afterwards asked:


My guess is the answer is:

"There is one stupid line of code holding everything up. Barwizi has asked fellow developers for a way around"

So I guess we're waiting on "fellow developers" to get back to Barwizi on possible solutions.

He mentioned something about FetchInputs and mempool. Glancing at the code, I'm guessing he means this line?

    bool FetchInputs(CTxDB& txdb, const std::map& mapTestPool,
                     bool fBlock, bool fMiner, MapPrevTx& inputsRet, bool& fInvalid);

Either way, it sounds like has to convince the wallet to accept there is no previous transaction in the blockchain, but instead, to accept the shares.txt and shares2.txt as being an authoritative resource for starting balance transactions.

BARWIZI IS A SCAMMER!  BEWARE!!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-scam-warning-barwizi-nrsnrbnoirgroupproject-x-789290

[MOD NOTE: Edited text size and removed off-topic image]

Can you please let us know how those numbers were provided to the GF holders? Because if they were emailed, I did not get them. BTW, I would be happy if some of the majority of those GF members would also express their satisfaction here, because if I was not speaking for them, then they could go against me and give you more support, isn't it?
Note that people have said several times they want to help you test the code. Do something with that.
What caused the delay in all this? Because it is obvious you promised to have something ready last Friday, and now you are saying that you will not be able to work on it for another 3 days?