[ANN] OpenBitASIC : The Open Source Bitcoin ASIC Initiative - page 6.

sadpandatech

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: Dhomochevsky on June 19, 2012, 06:54:20 AM

They actually said "LATE October". I'm pretty sure that means AT BEST a November delivery date - that's if everything goes according to plan. Which I'm pretty sure won't. So late November/December wouldn't be too far-fetched as an estimated delivery date.

Also, keep in mind, the specs could be different than what they announced.

I would be more inclined to believe it means they will be announcing pre-orders at that time. At this point in time their product exists only on software design. And yea, no way to verify specs until they get their first prototype which will likely be some time clsoe to Oct/Nov.

Gusti, did you get a chance to look at the link that Bulana posted for Easic? http://www.easic.com/press-releases/easic-announces-easicopy-asic/

Dhomochevsky

sr. member

Activity: 242

Merit: 251

They actually said "LATE October". I'm pretty sure that means AT BEST a November delivery date - that's if everything goes according to plan. Which I'm pretty sure won't. So late November/December wouldn't be too far-fetched as an estimated delivery date.

Also, keep in mind, the specs could be different than what they announced.

||bit

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 506

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 11:31:28 PM

Quote from: ||bit on June 18, 2012, 08:33:01 PM

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 10:42:40 AM

||bit@ ; rjk@ : exactly, going the full custom path right now

matthewh3@ : many thanks, I will take a look

Thanks for the feedback Gusti. BTW: What is your experience and expertise in relation to heading into something like this project?

5 years experience in mainframe technical support and sales, 10 years in the ISP industry, 8 years in VOIP industry, 1 year in bitcoin mining industry. ;-) Created and managed companies several times, some were succesful, some not.

Sounds good. Let's get/keep it rolling. I'm ready to see some serious competition for BFL. They claim availability in October, but as other threads ask: "What does that mean exactly?"

||bit

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ||bit on June 18, 2012, 08:33:01 PM

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 10:42:40 AM

||bit@ ; rjk@ : exactly, going the full custom path right now

matthewh3@ : many thanks, I will take a look

Thanks for the feedback Gusti. BTW: What is your experience and expertise in relation to heading into something like this project?

5 years experience in mainframe technical support and sales, 10 years in the ISP industry, 8 years in VOIP industry, 1 year in bitcoin mining industry. ;-) Created and managed companies several times, some were succesful, some not.

Inspector 2211

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

IMHO, Actel has technologically fallen behind the two FPGA market leaders, and Actel's devices, being EEPROM-based, are also more expensive than comparable products from Xilinx and Altera, thus: Nothing to see here, move along.

2112

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1073

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 09:54:17 PM

Any idea what hashing output is expected, and at what cost ?

Don't bother unless you plan on developing a battery-powered Bitcoin device. Actel (now Microsemi) chips are great, but for different application domains. The chips use comparatively low-density processes (220nm,150nm,130nm) optimized for mixed signal and "live-at-power-on" designs. Those are basically almost-digital-but-not-really-digital chips. For example the design flow includes calculations of parasitic capacitance of signal routing networks.

It may be worthwhile for you only as a cheap learning and practice tool before attempting a full-custom ASIC or at least cell-library ASIC design.

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Did you guys see this?

Posted by goxed:

PROASIC FPGA is a compromise between ASIC and FPGA
http://www.actel.com/products/pa3/

Much Lower power consumption than SRAM FPGA.

Axcelerator FPGA can be programmed only once and looks like it's a bit faster than proASIC.
http://www.actel.com/products/axcelerator/default.aspx

IGLOO FPGA can be programmed multiple times because instead of anti-fuse, a flash cell is used. Very low power consumption.
http://www.actel.com/products/iglooseries/default.aspx

http://www.actel.com/documents/LPFPGA_FS_PIB.pdf

The largest device has 24,000 Flip Flops, or around 1/10 the size of Spartan6 LX 150

SHA-256 hashing core for proASIC
http://www.actel.com/products/ip/search/detail.aspx?id=627

Any idea what hashing output is expected, and at what cost ? For what I understand, there is no FPGA or s-ASIC that can compete with a full custom ASIC on MH/$ and MH/J. That is the reason we decided to go to full custom way.

DiabloD3

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1000

DiabloMiner author

Subbed, especially after BFL's stunt.

||bit

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 506

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 10:42:40 AM

||bit@ ; rjk@ : exactly, going the full custom path right now

matthewh3@ : many thanks, I will take a look

Thanks for the feedback Gusti. BTW: What is your experience and expertise in relation to heading into something like this project?

sadpandatech

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: arsenische on June 18, 2012, 01:49:47 PM

Quote from: World on June 18, 2012, 01:27:49 PM

Quote from: matthewh3 on June 18, 2012, 09:36:20 AM

I think you should follow the method of the Bitcoin(card) Fund - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincard-fund-86083 - but also add a GLBSE way to invest.

+1

I don't have much money, but I'd like to buy some GLBSE shares of this venture, please let us know when/if you issue them

+1

arsenische

legendary

Activity: 1199

Merit: 1012

Quote from: World on June 18, 2012, 01:27:49 PM

Quote from: matthewh3 on June 18, 2012, 09:36:20 AM

I think you should follow the method of the Bitcoin(card) Fund - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincard-fund-86083 - but also add a GLBSE way to invest.

+1

I don't have much money, but I'd like to buy some GLBSE shares of this venture, please let us know when/if you issue them

World

hero member

Activity: 743

Merit: 500

Quote from: matthewh3 on June 18, 2012, 09:36:20 AM

I think you should follow the method of the Bitcoin(card) Fund - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincard-fund-86083 - but also add a GLBSE way to invest.

+1

Serenata

sr. member

Activity: 250

Merit: 250

I really like the Open idea of this project.
I too would like to see devices for smaller-scale miners. Devices priced close to $500, attractive to a wider audience.
Last but not least, I'm in favor of the bitcoiners' direct investment in the project.
A project made from us (open source), supported by us (direct investment), targeted to us (lower cost of ownership).

Watching closely.

nedbert9

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Inactive

Quote from: matthewh3 on June 18, 2012, 09:36:20 AM

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 07:42:02 AM

We are negotiating with 3 different ASIC's fabs at this moment, we expect to have the figures for a full ASIC implementation anytime soon. Right after that, we will come with an adapted plan to finance it.

I personally see BFL's announce strategy only designed to make actual competition the highest possible damage.
So I will love to beat them both in price and time to market.

I think you should follow the method of the Bitcoin(card) Fund - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincard-fund-86083 - but also add a GLBSE way to invest.

I wonder if NRE cost can be sufficiently distributed. Seems the heavy mining hitters have dumped so much of their cash on BFL (including me to a certain extent).

Though, if price/performance is right, i.e. to avoid severe depreciation, with OpenBitASIC it will be the smart way to go. Even if one has significant investment in BFL.

I'll look forward to doing my part.

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

||bit@ ; rjk@ : exactly, going the full custom path right now

matthewh3@ : many thanks, I will take a look

P4man

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Using words as "ASIC fabs" scares me a bit TBH.

Anyway, Im guessing they are looking at structured asics / gate array chips, there is no other way to have a reasonable chance of beating BFL to market. Whether a s-asic will turn out to be price/performance/power competitive with BFLs offering will be interesting to see, but I would guess absolutely not; but given the difference between marginal cost and market value, if they are fast enough to market that may not be a deal breaker. Performance after all is just a matter of using more chips, and power consumption will be lots better than FPGAs anyway. It will simply be a matter of shipping high enough volume fast enough, triggering the price war and difficulty explosion we are all so looking forward to

.

matthewh3

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1003

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 07:42:02 AM

We are negotiating with 3 different ASIC's fabs at this moment, we expect to have the figures for a full ASIC implementation anytime soon. Right after that, we will come with an adapted plan to finance it.

I personally see BFL's announce strategy only designed to make actual competition the highest possible damage.
So I will love to beat them both in price and time to market.

I think you should follow the method of the Bitcoin(card) Fund - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincard-fund-86083 - but also add a GLBSE way to invest.

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: ||bit on June 18, 2012, 09:20:52 AM

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 07:42:02 AM

We are negotiating with 3 different ASIC's fabs at this moment, we expect to have the figures for a full ASIC implementation anytime soon. Right after that, we will come with an adapted plan to finance it.

I personally see BFL's announce strategy only designed to make actual competition the highest possible damage.
So I will love to beat them both in price and time to market.

So, you are referring to a full ASIC, meaning custom ASIC?.... and not a hardcopy?

Probably started with hardcopy and decided that for not much more cost to go full custom... just guessing though.

||bit

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 506

Quote from: gusti on June 18, 2012, 07:42:02 AM

We are negotiating with 3 different ASIC's fabs at this moment, we expect to have the figures for a full ASIC implementation anytime soon. Right after that, we will come with an adapted plan to finance it.

I personally see BFL's announce strategy only designed to make actual competition the highest possible damage.
So I will love to beat them both in price and time to market.

So, you are referring to a full ASIC, meaning custom ASIC?.... and not a hardcopy?

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

We are negotiating with 3 different ASIC's fabs at this moment, we expect to have the figures for a full ASIC implementation anytime soon. Right after that, we will come with an adapted plan to finance it.

I personally see BFL's announce strategy only designed to make actual competition the highest possible damage.
So I will love to beat them both in price and time to market.

Topic: [ANN] OpenBitASIC : The Open Source Bitcoin ASIC Initiative - page 6. (Read 50782 times)