Correct me if I am wrong, but what the early investors are doing it called "being angry" for getting something other than what they agreed upon when initially buying into the coin. At the point of sale for the early investor, none of us was warned about getting our shares dilutted to basically nothing.
I'm an early investor of another coin, and when they did their swap, it was 1 for 1. So now you have a TON of early investors who called the share dilustion "BS". It is what it is, and with 100% accuracy, the PAC DEV team lost all of the early investor base which is substantially larger than the new investor base at the time of writing. The early investors will NOT buy into this coin again (Fool me once, your fault, fool me twice, MY FAULT because I new better). Go ahead and tell us that early investors should "get over it", "stop being a baby", "grow up", and "move on with your life." The funny and interesting thing is, those comments were echoed or used when promoting your coin, but Oh baby, you love to use it now.
I'd like to see your numbers. You claim we lost "all" early investors. Provide some proof to that. A fud attack from a handful of our total investors, plus bots, does not represent the entirety of the early investors.
Early investors would be defined as people who bought in back in the early days of the coin. So you bought in back in 2014/2015...correct? If so, you bought when Bill Corless and his team owned and ran the coin. Of course you didn't hear about the redemption, as it wasn't part of his plans. He then abandoned Paccoin, and it just sat on the market, unattended, and with the same broken faulty code. When the new team took over the coin in late 2017, it was decided to undergo a transformation. The old code was badly written, broken, theoretically infinite supply which would have never allowed Paccoin to grow into any real value, and caused a lot of headaches for staking rewards. Thus a new coin was created. Once the decision was made, and the code being written, it was announced that the old Paccoin would undergo a Redemption to the new coin at 1000:1, with the new coin being released at x1000 of the then current price of Paccoin. The name, logo, and cost of the Masternodes were all community chosen.
So if you were an early investor, you would have known all about these things, right?
We have explained multiple times why people such as yourself didn't understand the sudden change in value of your investment, due to the BTC decimal place limitations. Even with warnings across multiple social media platforms, not everyone was reached. We put it out there that people need to get off of Cryptopia, and to do your research on prices vs different pairings, before purchasing. We are sympathetic to those who were caught completely off guard, but there was no scam.
If we were a scam, we would have sold all the old Paccoin as investors sent them in. Considering they are still sitting in the redemption wallets and Paccoin is delisted, that means we are the worst scammers ever.
If we were a scam, we would have left. We are still here.
If we were a scam, we wouldn't be continuing to develop the coin, projects, release new wallets, be a presenter at a Cryptocurrency expo in London, and we certainly wouldn't be pushing out a fix to stop the ProHash issue from making the price of the coin go down.
I hope this helps clear things up for you.
