Topic: [ANN] [POW] [MSR] Masari - simple, scalable, and secure cryptocurrency - page 81. (Read 85417 times)

I still don't think there is need for another token unless it is better than the exisitng projects,

I want the team to help me understand why this project is better than the current list of privacy tokens already in the market

I've got a Masari pool up and running.

http://www.masaripool.com

running a couple days now,
payouts tested and working 100%,
17KH/s hashrate

1% core dev fee, 1% pool fee


If you have any questions come ask us on the Masari slack! (ann post)

There has been no race created which can defeat Masari in.

@megacrypto

OK great. Please keep us posted.
 

i got a pool running but waiting to see how it will process payments ... i only have 400 H/s so waiting to find a block and see ...

i will post the result once a block is found and paid

i used forknote code and changed the "package.json" as mentioned in the first post

Hello!

Did anyone succeed to set up a pool yet?

Masari's blockchain is at 10,000+ blocks now with a relatively healthy network hashrate of 24 kh/s. I think at this point a pool is necessary.

@Thaer: how about setting a bounty for a pool? 

@micronotecoin You should've looked at the code for more than 10 minutes, because you missed quite a bit, only used much earlier commits, ignored future commits that counter your false claims, and have concluded yourself with misleading and unfounded comments that are simply taking commits out of context to ineffectively smear the project. The Masari project took weeks to understand Monero, and many weeks to implement as a fork. Your rushed audit of the code is most likely because your anonymous account for MicroNote looks like a Forknote project that took 10 minutes to configure, and you don't see me on your thread making false claims.

Please take a look at the master branch's commit history for reference (as opposed to that misleading tree branch you've cut out up to the rebranding commit): https://github.com/masari-project/masari/commits/master

First of all, the first working state of this project is broken down into many parts for ease of readability, including project renames, dns entries, and checkpoints. The release tag is 22 commits into the project, with the Monero code cleanly separated into its own commit and the Masari fork with the rest of the commits.

Monero v0.11.0.0 as an initial commit: 7ad255d89084bd231efe6bd040a357dde2fa1886.

First pass changes, incomplete at the time, mostly addressing RingCT refactors and minor protocol changes (i.e. removing block 202612 bug fixes): c3f3819f6b5032d93bbc221dea4b35763234b716

First pass tests changes, because "good forks" make sure their code has test coverage and nothing is broken: c3f3819f6b5032d93bbc221dea4b35763234b716

The hard-coded checkpoints you're addressing, are removed in a 14-day old commit titled "Clear checkpoints and temp remove dns entries." before the MSR network was live: 358cdf1674e6472d926dcf68c6ccc7c5c5c5ab3c .The daemons would have not synchronised if they were in place.

The isolated Masari rebrand commit, using sed and other tools in the Unix pipeline: a3c700ea9e955af962ba22aac7a8e8426a2dc7a4 . Any erroneously renamed text during this necessary rename for a fork, would be cleaned up when possible, but are low priority since they don't affect the functionality of the code.

This project is aiming to contribute to the Monero ecosystem by promoting free-market competition, where other forks are experimenting in this space. This is evident by the fully transparent code-base available that anybody can use and create a fork themselves, because I didn't squash everything into a single obfuscated "first commit" that would have otherwise made it very difficult to view changes in the project.

If you have valid concerns, please do voice them and we can have a discussion. If you're just here to spread fake news because I've made it easy for you to audit and misrepresent my code, with all due respect please keep to your project.

Best regards,
Thaer

Yes, but do you think the "good fork" is a coin that forked monero and the only change on the code is a massive change of "monero" string for "masari" string?

https://github.com/masari-project/masari/commit/a3c700ea9e955af962ba22aac7a8e8426a2dc7a4#diff-5e21fe42e16f418234d83a880b32d999

It's ridiculous, the code have parts (product of this massive rename) with references to:

- Specific blocks, for example in this case: monero block 202612 (Masari not arrived to this blockheight), with his specific hash. And for sure, he changed monerochain.info for the inexistent masarichain.info:

https://github.com/masari-project/masari/blob/a3c700ea9e955af962ba22aac7a8e8426a2dc7a4/src/crypto/tree-hash.c


- Inexistent email addresses and change nicknames of people involved on Monero development (moneromoo is masarimoo lol):

https://github.com/masari-project/masari/blob/a3c700ea9e955af962ba22aac7a8e8426a2dc7a4/VULNERABILITY_RESPONSE_PROCESS.md


- Monero block checkpoints. I don't know Monero code and I don't know the repercussion of it, but the pair block/hash of Monero blockchain hardcoded in Masari code... Didn't looks good

https://github.com/masari-project/masari/blob/a3c700ea9e955af962ba22aac7a8e8426a2dc7a4/src/cryptonote_basic/checkpoints.cpp


- Inexistent domains:


And this only checking the code for 10 minutes...

Really lazy project...

Best regards...

I have updated the announcement page for those interested in creating a pool, with instructions on how to configure node-cryptonote-pool, with a necessary dependencies change to use this MSR patched version of cryptonote-util in order for the pool to work: https://github.com/masari-project/node-cryptonote-util/tree/msr

More updates coming soon!

Cheers,
Thaer

because monero needs a good fork coin in the table.

Why people are interested in this one? I can't get it.

Not only do you have to have content in your digital and inbound online security marketing strategies, but content that gets an LOL, gets read, noticed, shared, clicked, and commented on is how YOU make a human connection in today's noisy, multi-device world.

Congratulations for this amazing interesting project!
 It seems very promising based on a new robust concept!
If by any change you required a professional Portuguese translator with experience and quality to support with ANN, Bounty, WHITE PAPER or websites, please kindly PM!
Thank you and all the success for project!

 

Dont working

The above pool by danycoman won't work - there are issues with cryptonote-util module in node-cryptonote-pool that cause the pool threads to fail. I'll be looking into this and will be publishing a fix so that others can spin up their pools with node-cryptonote-pool.

Cheers,
Thaer

Very interesting coin....however I would like to recommend that you provide more detail technical information about the team supporting this COIN and as well roadmap of it!

Hello everybody,

I added the coin to the pool http://masari.mine-pool.ro.



Daniel


www.mine-pool.ro

Yes , but this source wallet is shit...



@Dev, Send me private conf file for wallet .pool  is build need just wallet rpc ..your wallet source no support rpc server.

I need wallet rpc for pool.

we need pool immediately

No, block reward is 34.67187232 and declining.