Topic: [ANN] Qora | Released 16 May | 100% POS | New Source - page 74. (Read 748232 times)

OS and AE are obviously important but I bet what shoots the price up is a nice looking GUI. I know it's superficial but people are. Many dismissed Qora straight from the start due to basic windows GUI and people still regularly say it's crap 'cause it looks like windows 95'     Plus I've seen IPO's that have collected a massive amount of BTC based on a great looking wallet that turned out to be a fake photoshop job.  


Once the GUI is looking great and we are open source with the technical advantages Qora has as a trading platform this coin will be top 10. I'm holding.

supernet is not important.
but ae and os will be big thing.

I voted No

OS+AE+join in Supernet，to the moon

Thanks for the clarification.

James said he would be working with the VRC people to help them with some issues. He never said they would be part of the superNET. Then again, he never said they wouldn't.

after ae , the price will go to 40 sat .
after os, the price will go to 80 sat.
let's wait.

OS+AE ，to the moon

Agree

The pop in price of being involved seems to of faded. Take that away and many people might think differently.

It's an interesting idea but I think it's better to keep the door open and see how things pan out.

In the end we won't be joining if Qora is dead set against it. So far he hasn't commented which suggests to me he isn't considering it at least at the moment. Personally I like the idea of Qora being a leader rather than a follower.

Results update (arbitrary deadline of Sept 10 cancelled as it's arbitrary   )

Yes - 61%
No - 39%

all votes:   1,008,953,571 (10% of all Qora)

http://qora.co.in/?q=%EF%BB%BFshould+qora+strive+to+be+part+of+btcd+supernet+core%3F&poll

Four coins thusfar included in supernet core and brief tech offering:

Bitcoindark (BTCD) - primary teleporting tech to send and receive txs to and from all coins' networks (under development)
Boolberry (BBR) - onion routing tech to anonomize coins entering teleporting network
Vericoin (VRC) - coin <--> fiat technology (interesting community conversations over the past few days for and against)
NXT - other jl777 technologies including privacybet, instadex, mgw, etc

Market cap on these coins have increased substantially since announcement. At the end of supernet fundraising, BTC collected will be used to sustain growth and value of coins.

Qora is doing fine without supernet and need not apply IMO but always an option if Qora/community so chooses.

Thank you twospirit 

It's a chicken and egg problem. More nodes are not set up, because the price is low and there is no incentive to set up nodes. The price is low because investors and prospective users don't set up nodes and don't grow the network and community. Make a bounty of at least 10k qora/week, that would at least cover hosting expenses. If the price goes higher, you can always lower the weekly payout.

I found this
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=522102.msg6943975;topicseen#msg6943975

Thanks!

For Staking  QORA i just have to leave the wallet open (unlocked, same as i do with HYP and RDD )?

Welcome to Qora, That seems awesome, we appreciate people trying to build ontop of Qora.

I wondered if you knew there was a chat function. http://qora.co.in/chat/

Qora turns up now and again, I imagine you would have a lot to talk about if you actually did catch him.

Qora has said he is open to PM's too.

This is over my head but may be helpful: http://pastebin.com/qNTjEcvi

I'm thinking of code right now. I again pitch an escrow/feedback system built with Qora's arb trans abilities to 'back' the AE when it's launched - as a consumer my main issue with trusting anyone online is trust, and without a foolproof and scamproof trust system in place I almost always refuse to trust anyone asking for my money (or other assets). As a developer I have the ability to implement this, I just want to brainstorm it before I commit any lines of code. My thought is that released escrow means you're happy with whatever it is you did, so that would count as positive feedback. If you don't release escrow it's negative feedback. If you don't want to use escrow you may or may not have the ability to leave feedback? thoughts? How much should it be weighted? How much should new users be able to influence the feedback rating of other users, new and established, vs. how much weight should be given to established ones? Should it even be weighted, or should it be designed in such a way that everyone's opinion is equal but you don't get an opinion until so many or so much transactions? Or you'd need transactions with established people first, they review you, then eventually you get the ability to do stuff? Should there be limits or thresholds for that? Should we try as hard as we can to copy something tried and true - like ebay - or try something revolutionary? Would an ebay style feedback and escrow system work when there's usually not fiat involved?

Thoughts ?

First of all thanks to anyone willing to build things on top of qora. It will be amazing.


With time qora will get bigger and bigger. Dont expect the price to be so low for long. Everyone has his chance to get in now.


The speed and features of qora are unique, check it for yourselves. The wallet is more simplistic and user friendly than all the rest. With the future enhancements in the Gui, like pie charts, eye candy buttons and so on, it will be even more embellished.


It has a more fair distribution than nxt, better security by having a seed and password, it is also possible to mine with locked wallet, it has a dedicated dev and the list goes on and on...


It's obvious it wont stay for long unnoticed. The community is being built, the dumpers have left, the whitepaper will come and possibly soon after some code snippets.