1) Doge 1.5%
2) Litecoin 1.6%
3) Quark 2.8%
4) Feathercoin 5.6%
5) Vertcoin 8%
6) Peercoin 9.4%
I dont know from where you got this bs numbers but even they were true i guess nobody had a problem with such a small premine for the dev team.
Much worse
Darkcoin 40% in first 24 hours
Blackcoin 10% in less than 12 hours and 100% after 6 days
Nxt 100% premined and gave to 73 people
And thats why they have such a low trade volume
but its nice seeing a community looking which coin is the smaller scam coin
So Thule as you see Quark is not really worse than any other coin. So you have been proven wrong about the premine and the "most coins have been mined in the first day"
Where have i proofen wrong ?LOL what a dumbshit you are.Showing some stats of other scamcoin and claiming of proof that quark is not a instamine. LOL
Comparing shitcoins with quark.LOL You guys just want to have the best scamcoin or do you really want to create something valuable ?
Contrary on what you believe, we CAN do any hard fork and no one will lose any coins so why do you want to prove continually that you have no idea what you are talking about ?
Do you even know what a hard fork is ?
Quark had about 700 Mh/s in first days after announcement:
http://qrk.blockr.io/charts. Even if only 100 miners were mining for the first 6 weeks were ~6 millions quark released daily, even if some of them kept their quarks for 1 year GOOD for them,
6 million released daily ?Thats already 252 millions after 6 weeks LOL .Maybe we should say way over 100 million coins have been mined in the first day
Anyone whining about instamine simply was not a witness to the first couple months of QRK mining and trading.
I was from day one so i know exectly the history of quark
kolin is not a dev, he is a little above your level of knowledge of crypto code
Did i ever claimed he is a dev you moron.I said he is extremly against a hard fork
It just proofs how poor and low minded this community is trying to deproof an instamine with other coins distribution