it was never my intention to make anyone rich - if i wanted to do that i could cashed out ages ago.. my intention was to give people a chance.
the opposite of what corp Banks and their agents do.
i don't have to get up in the morning and justify enslavement and stagnation, waste and backwardness.
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 116. (Read 1031025 times)
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
Come on Kolin, i like you since you made me rich (by my standards) but be serious this mimimi coin offers nothing to current qrk investors.
The foundation fund has been discussed and explained for the last 20 pages over and over. Yes, it is some central planning pool that will be transparent and used to build out features,services and start projects for qrk that the coin needs.
Mimimimi coin solves nothing and offers no advantage to current qrk holders/miners vs any other miner so why would the qrk community care less about it.
QRKfx proof of burn if handled correctly is exactly what qrk needs.
Cloak, dark, xc, - these coins are not going away, i see them only taking larger and larger market share. They are well funded and have quality development teams and a big communities of supporters.
QRKFX have you talked to any serious developers about this new project?
Rock out - and i encourage you to do the "proof of burn" or whatever it is .
i'm not stopping any member from doing whatever they want with their QRK if you want to burn in some manner , i'll be standing there warming my hands on the fire.
in the same sense also don't mine this other crypto, as of course it was released perfectly freely onto the forum and everyone knows about it, the difficulty last check was pretty low.
so if its a "conspiracy" its a good one, I like it because it was a fair start its not premined and it has good fundamentals - there could be others out there also ?
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
Come on Kolin, i like you since you made me rich (by my standards) but be serious this mimimi coin offers nothing to current qrk investors.
The foundation fund has been discussed and explained for the last 20 pages over and over. Yes, it is some central planning pool that will be transparent and used to build out features,services and start projects for qrk that the coin needs.
Mimimimi coin solves nothing and offers no advantage to current qrk holders/miners vs any other miner so why would the qrk community care less about it.
QRKfx proof of burn if handled correctly is exactly what qrk needs.
Cloak, dark, xc, - these coins are not going away, i see them only taking larger and larger market share. They are well funded and have quality development teams and a big communities of supporters.
QRKFX have you talked to any serious developers about this new project?
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
It's not profitable to mine. Do the math. I did it a bunch of times on Reddit before getting my posts removed.
Here's one where I actually did the math and calculations on a [profitable] mining technique that really turns out to be not profitable for 2 years because of the initial costs. http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/28szbe/got_gridseed_burning_scrypt_at_hashcows_and/cie9rcj
People don't even know what Quark is anymore and it's so obsolete it's not even funny. New coins are coming out with TOR, Anonymous PoS, automatic coin mixing, etc. That's what people want. Quark has none of that.
I posted a link to the hashing algorithms the X## functions have. They have all of the hashing algorithms, and more. I just got ad hominem attacks.
It's sometimes fun to stir shit up, drop a little bomb - we all do it in life from time to time in life.
I tried to help, and people are realizing I was helping all along. I'll say it again. If you guys seriously want to continue with Quark, you need to get rid of Kolin.
Also, figure out who "Max" is. Do some digging. Nobody has ever known and it's concerning.
Always Remember:
"Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public." -Kolin
Max is gone as far as i can tell. He probably started qrk as a project and got bored with it. I don't think he ever had many qrk so his interest obviously drained away quickly.
If you look at the start steve lamb sucked up huge amounts of easy qrk, i would bet max got a few blocks but not enough to fund the sort of dev evans or dan have. Actually he is probably the most silent developer of a coin of any note.
We need to focus on bringing in a new development team and pretty fast. I see qrk is doing great again today another 6% down. Tthe super block when i first mentioned it at 10% has been paid over about 3x now in losses alone because nobody is seeing qrk as anything but a dinosaur currency with no developer and no clear goals, projects or anything else really.
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
It's not profitable to mine. Do the math. I did it a bunch of times on Reddit before getting my posts removed.
Here's one where I actually did the math and calculations on a [profitable] mining technique that really turns out to be not profitable for 2 years because of the initial costs. http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/28szbe/got_gridseed_burning_scrypt_at_hashcows_and/cie9rcj
People don't even know what Quark is anymore and it's so obsolete it's not even funny. New coins are coming out with TOR, Anonymous PoS, automatic coin mixing, etc. That's what people want. Quark has none of that.
I posted a link to the hashing algorithms the X## functions have. They have all of the hashing algorithms, and more. I just got ad hominem attacks.
It's sometimes fun to stir shit up, drop a little bomb - we all do it in life from time to time in life.
I tried to help, and people are realizing I was helping all along. I'll say it again. If you guys seriously want to continue with Quark, you need to get rid of Kolin.
Also, figure out who "Max" is. Do some digging. Nobody has ever known and it's concerning.
Always Remember:
"Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public." -Kolin
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
Lets be honest you updated everyone 1,5 months after the release and the core members didn't knew about it either. If Quark was a company you would be in trouble for it.
Ah I'm all about public everything i do is public.
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
This Crypto was listed on largest public Crypto forum on the face of the earth and its clear that most that contributed can not be called "sockpuppets"
Also mining goes out to 4 years before halving, you can speculate on what the market will do that great i like that , we can all speculate , we.can all mine or speculate and have an opinion make allegations feel sad or happy jump or dance.
That's the great thing you disagree?
Also you seem to be pretty caught up with the "foundation fund" what's that all about ?
What's the "foundation fund" do? Is this some central planning pool ?
the whole market is developing Bitcoin looks like a huge stagnating Shell form where i sit, whereas development is occurring in other alternative markets.
Bitcoin stagnating shell ? where do you sit ? lol .. even current Quark wallet is being worked around the Bitcoin core wallet, the development its been flourishing for Bitcoin and we need it do so because it carries us further into mass adoption, people learn about crypto currencies every day THANKS to bitcoin, not thanks to Quark or Litecoin. I wish people will learn more about Quark because it provides much more than any other coin both as economic model and as protocol features but currently Bitcoin is driving the development in all areas, well at least from where I sit.
Yeah it's an "economics" thing.
Indeed i guess time will tell.
the whole market is developing Bitcoin looks like a huge stagnating Shell form where i sit, whereas development is occurring in other alternative markets.
Bitcoin stagnating shell ? where do you sit ? lol .. even current Quark wallet is being worked around the Bitcoin core wallet, the development its been flourishing for Bitcoin and we need it do so because it carries us further into mass adoption, people learn about crypto currencies every day THANKS to bitcoin, not thanks to Quark or Litecoin. I wish people will learn more about Quark because it provides much more than any other coin both as economic model and as protocol features but currently Bitcoin is driving the development in all areas, well at least from where I sit.
is this a pump and dump?
I think so there hasn't been a news to cause a bullish rally, but hey crypto is crazy
is this a pump and dump?
Maybe. Fact is, millions have been sold in the last time and immediately after some high buy order were placed.
is this a pump and dump?
Hi guys,
i am a top 29 quark holder with almost 1m quarks. I invested around $10k in Litecoin when they were around $2. I had around 6000 Litecoin which i sold all at between $24 and $26 each making $150k and exchanged them to BTC.
Before Quark i have been active in BTC-e and thats where i found out about Quark. Everyone was talking about it. I researched a little and was convinced to go big on it. I loved the brand, the logo, and the fact that pretty well known people in the industry were talking about it.
I don't know if you guys remember that picture at the forums someone posted which stated that there was a 100 BTC buy order for quark, well that was my order. I bought 500k quark at 0.00019 which made the price shoot up to 0.00032. So greed got me and i started to hold but then Bitcoin crashed and quark went with it. After that it went worse and 2 things that bothered me was kolins behaviour and developers inactivity especially lack of interaction with the community, but somehow i kept my fate and bought another 500k at lower prices.
So as you see i have lost around $140k (if i would sell) on quark, would i have been in Bitcoin i would have lost $50k. Meanwhile i have been giving around 40k quark to different projects like thunderclap where i gave away around 25k quark and apart from that i have been customising Quark subreddit to make it look nice. Notice that i'm just a trader and have no skills in coding and such so it's the best i can do. You might wonder why i don't give away much more, well the answer is simple i have already lost a lot and i'm certainly not rich in my private life. Although i still have fate in it and refuse to sell at these prices.
Regarding proof of burn i must say it sound pretty interesting, but doubts are naturally showing because it will be a new coin and will it be attractive amongst all these new coins, although with all these new scam coins coming out if one of them is not a scam with active and trustful dev team it will attract people. On the other hand quark already has settled itself and pretty well known, but then again as we know there are some issues with quark. I must say that i have seen great core members like quarkfx, vic, coinmama and couple others.
i am a top 29 quark holder with almost 1m quarks. I invested around $10k in Litecoin when they were around $2. I had around 6000 Litecoin which i sold all at between $24 and $26 each making $150k and exchanged them to BTC.
Before Quark i have been active in BTC-e and thats where i found out about Quark. Everyone was talking about it. I researched a little and was convinced to go big on it. I loved the brand, the logo, and the fact that pretty well known people in the industry were talking about it.
I don't know if you guys remember that picture at the forums someone posted which stated that there was a 100 BTC buy order for quark, well that was my order. I bought 500k quark at 0.00019 which made the price shoot up to 0.00032. So greed got me and i started to hold but then Bitcoin crashed and quark went with it. After that it went worse and 2 things that bothered me was kolins behaviour and developers inactivity especially lack of interaction with the community, but somehow i kept my fate and bought another 500k at lower prices.
So as you see i have lost around $140k (if i would sell) on quark, would i have been in Bitcoin i would have lost $50k. Meanwhile i have been giving around 40k quark to different projects like thunderclap where i gave away around 25k quark and apart from that i have been customising Quark subreddit to make it look nice. Notice that i'm just a trader and have no skills in coding and such so it's the best i can do. You might wonder why i don't give away much more, well the answer is simple i have already lost a lot and i'm certainly not rich in my private life. Although i still have fate in it and refuse to sell at these prices.
Regarding proof of burn i must say it sound pretty interesting, but doubts are naturally showing because it will be a new coin and will it be attractive amongst all these new coins, although with all these new scam coins coming out if one of them is not a scam with active and trustful dev team it will attract people. On the other hand quark already has settled itself and pretty well known, but then again as we know there are some issues with quark. I must say that i have seen great core members like quarkfx, vic, coinmama and couple others.
Hey Netnox,
I really feel for guys like you. I got in much later and barring a price correction have lost a decent chunk of cash, but nowhere near what you have. Glad to have you on board...hope we can get Quark back to a reasonable market cap:)
Hey netox that's nice but, had :
1. the Developer not designed Quark in the way it was designed
and
2. I not introduced it to a real market (not a circle jerk of Bitcoin and Litecoin)
Quark would not exist now, people don't put capital into currency because they do or don't "like" people - free market currency is related to connected energy so productive capacity.
I've always only ever worked towards those goals, the whole market is developing Bitcoin looks like a huge stagnating Shell form where i sit, whereas development is occurring in other alternative markets.
Quark's future as a continually developing protocol is pretty great i think.
Hi guys,
i am a top 29 quark holder with almost 1m quarks. I invested around $10k in Litecoin when they were around $2. I had around 6000 Litecoin which i sold all at between $24 and $26 each making $150k and exchanged them to BTC.
Before Quark i have been active in BTC-e and that where i found out about Quark. Everyone was talking about it. I researched a little and was convinced to go big on it. I loved the brand, the logo, and the fact that pretty well known people in the industry were talking about it.
I don't know if you guys remember that picture at the forums someone posted which stated that there was a 100 BTC buy order for quark, well that was me. I bought 500k quark at 0.00019 which made the price shoot up to 0.00032. So greed got me and i started to hold but then Bitcoin crashed and quark went with it. After that it went worse and 1 thing that bothered me was kolins behaviour, but somehow i kept my fate and bought another 500k BTC at lower prices.
So as you see i have lost around $140k (if i would sell) on quark, would i have been in Bitcoin i would have lost $50k. Meanwhile i have been giving around 40k quark to different projects like thunderclap where i gave away around 25k quark and apart from that i have been customising Quark subreddit to make it look nice. Notice that i'm just a trader and have no skills in coding and such so it's the best i can do. You might wonder why i don't give away much more, well the answer is simple i have already lost a lot and i'm certainly not rich in my private life. Although i still have fate in it and refuse to sell at these prices.
Hi Netnox, I want to say I respect the faith you've given Quark. I only found out about Quark early last month, I had huge issues with bitcoin last year with some mining equipment almost getting ripped of $40K. Since then I haven't followed any activity in crypto world till late December when I caught up with all the news and I remembered I had some forgotten bitcoins in mtgox and blockchain.info. Then in April I started investing again in Bitcoin and I slowly realized that the economic model serves only for hording and isn't a viable financial day to day purchases, so I started to look out for Alts which provide exactly this, from all the top 40 coins I must say the only viable alternative that I found was Quark!i am a top 29 quark holder with almost 1m quarks. I invested around $10k in Litecoin when they were around $2. I had around 6000 Litecoin which i sold all at between $24 and $26 each making $150k and exchanged them to BTC.
Before Quark i have been active in BTC-e and that where i found out about Quark. Everyone was talking about it. I researched a little and was convinced to go big on it. I loved the brand, the logo, and the fact that pretty well known people in the industry were talking about it.
I don't know if you guys remember that picture at the forums someone posted which stated that there was a 100 BTC buy order for quark, well that was me. I bought 500k quark at 0.00019 which made the price shoot up to 0.00032. So greed got me and i started to hold but then Bitcoin crashed and quark went with it. After that it went worse and 1 thing that bothered me was kolins behaviour, but somehow i kept my fate and bought another 500k BTC at lower prices.
So as you see i have lost around $140k (if i would sell) on quark, would i have been in Bitcoin i would have lost $50k. Meanwhile i have been giving around 40k quark to different projects like thunderclap where i gave away around 25k quark and apart from that i have been customising Quark subreddit to make it look nice. Notice that i'm just a trader and have no skills in coding and such so it's the best i can do. You might wonder why i don't give away much more, well the answer is simple i have already lost a lot and i'm certainly not rich in my private life. Although i still have fate in it and refuse to sell at these prices.
The issue with large purses that is being brought up is false because every coin has it, hell even Satoshi has 1 million bitcoins which are thought to be either lost or simply left untouched. Why is false, because Quark is inflationary in nature and with the million coins added annually it only means that there is no reason for speculating on its value and so the 1000 miners that were mining in the first 6 months probably sold all their quark already and those that bought at that early stage took all the risks, so its only fair they should be rewarded if the value goes up. You are among those who took all the risks and now you're losing so huge respect to those like you that hold their QRK and also try to get involved in the community.
Bam - and its so simple
+ 1
just so everyone knows most people understand this - they just don't voice their opinions, its been beautiful watching the trolling attempts all fro nothing they have wasted so much energy ha ha.
all that has happened is exactly what would have happened ha oh well i suppose if any of them were getting paid like our poor penniless eastern European friend "Thule" it was all worth it : D
So who is in favour of PoB. From what i've read from cryptohunters posts and quarkfx it looks promising, at least from an active devs perspective. Also it won't be a scam like all these new coins coming out so it may attract people if announced solidly.
Anyone is free to start any Quark related projects as long as it doesn't require changing the protocol. Investors will come if the community shows more positive attitude and they see we have a strong community. I'm not against PoB as long as it doesn't affect Quark so those who wish to switch to the new coin that relies on Quark network are free to do so, same with merge mining.
Ok.. noww to the moon!
Ok.. noww to the moon!
I don't know why you are referring to merge mining. Of course people are free to convince other coins to give Quark additional hashrate. This has anything to do with the latest complaints about merge mining (that is what appears to be a made up story). I personally won't support anything that is set up intransparently and I know others won't do neither.
Anyone is free to start any Quark related projects as long as it doesn't require changing the protocol. Investors will come if the community shows more positive attitude and they see we have a strong community. I'm not against PoB as long as it doesn't affect Quark so those who wish to switch to the new coin that relies on Quark network are free to do so, same with merge mining.
Ok.. noww to the moon!
Ok.. noww to the moon!
I don't know why you are referring to merge mining. Of course people are free to convince other coins to give Quark additional hashrate. This has anything to do with the latest complaints about merge mining (that is what appears to be a made up story). I personally won't support anything that is set up intransparently and I know others won't do neither.
Anyone is free to start any Quark related projects as long as it doesn't require changing the protocol. Investors will come if the community shows more positive attitude and they see we have a strong community. I'm not against PoB as long as it doesn't affect Quark so those who wish to switch to the new coin that relies on Quark network are free to do so, same with merge mining.
Ok.. noww to the moon!
Ok.. noww to the moon!
Jump to: