Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 125. (Read 1031025 times)

Hopefully that´s also the case for the renewed Foundation.

The new forum is going to be awesome  

Why new forum would be a huge thing?

wait for new forum.... coming very soon.....tihis will be huge!

Thread is heating up ;p

if you call the audit no proof i guess you wont take anything as proof

Lol, why am I not surprised that your "sources" in fact are no proof for your claims (btw. I know both threads, I even know your senseless posts). Here is a good read for you. And now excuse me, I need to ignore you.

the problem is, there is no source code (git) so we cant know whats changed, also its winblows shitware

This would be a better way coinerer, usually people won't trust it easily if it doesn't come from the dev himself

Coinerer, you are remarkably persistent with your new wallet compilations, however, as QuarkFX stated, no one in their right mind is going to trust or download a wallet like this--Would you like to work on the social wallet? I know you have stated you do not have C++ experience, but if you are truly interested in helping out I can place you in touch with the right person(s). Otherwise...

asking for proof and source?Makes you looking like a noob who has no idea what happend in the first quark board and why mods have been kicked.I guess you even didnt checked the blockchain yourself how noobish when investing in something.If you need proof just read the other dead board.

Here so you dont need to do your homework on your own


http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/368/auditing-block-chain

http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/1411/exchange-bought-000-worth-quark

What about connecting to other community members instead of posting dubious compuled wallets? I don´t know you. I don´t know anyone who knows you. You have no reputation. I would never install software by such a person, nor would I advise anyone to do so. Ifyou are seriously trying to help, then you better connect to other users. If you don´t I will rather warn others to use your ressources.

Faster than real devs

New Quark wallet v0.9.2.1, just like Bitcoin v0.9.2.1.  FOR TESTING ONLY!!!

My QuarkCoin Page:  http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/

Here you can download and test  http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/quark-0.9.2.1.7z

Tell your results! Response here!

Remember to backup your current wallet!!!


I am not Quark dev This is not official wallet! This is experiment! If wallet will not work I will remove it! It looks like normal wallet to me, although it is not maybe.


Maybe wallet will work, maybe it will not!

Results of VirusTotal.com check https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/e1d2391f70515ec98af21243e72c7ec4859515974e255c861347bd99fd979f9f/analysis/1405369439/

Provide a source.


Provide a source.

Who are you, a 5th grader? You aren´t even aware that using %s doesn´t work with infinite distributions and your numbers would be wrong even if it wouldn´t be infinite. Lol.



Provide a source.


Lol what would happen if Satoshi would sell-off, or large NXT holders, or large holders of basically every existing Altcoin. You are not aware that distribution in Altcoin is the reason why this is called a speculative market with exchange rates constantly jumping up and down - funny. How long have you been around? Distribution IS a problem but it is not a scam, as you suggest. Tell me one coin that wouldn´t collapse if the first-movers decide to sell-off. Panic will be caused everywere. This is an experiment and whoever invests money he can´t afford to lose is stupid as f*** and shouldn´t complain if he or she sells off with huge losses. Again: every crypto needs to take care of the distribution issue as it is a risk to stable exchange rates, but this doesn´t make jack a scam.


Uhm...well...if you believe every stupid propaganda... I never believed that crypto IS ALREADY an alternative to fiat. It will take years to take it there. But the deal is that a journey usually has a beginning and a final destination and people tend to start at the beginning and not at the final destination. You didn´t know that? Now you know.


Lol, what kind of tech guy are you that you thought crypto is annonymous? It´s pseudonymous, and everyone knows.


You know, every good conspiracy starts with "Why do you think...". It´s when I know I can stop reading because the talking individual has no hard proof to provide.


So what you say is, people with large amounts of money pumped Quark and eventually sold off. So isn´t that an argument against your claim of a bad distribution? I was never a fan of Bill Still and when I saw Max Keiser talked about Quark I knew this was a bad thing, but that´s (unfortunately) life: you can´t control the actions of others, especially with crypto. There are pumpers in every currency, but I won´t let you blame me for them.


The staff? Which staff?


Conclusion: You provide a lot of ble ble and substantial proof for the claims you make. From what you write you are everything but not new to the crypto scene, but obviously created another account instead of posting with your original ones (or others you have, i dont care). What does that make you? Reliable?

Hilux proof was already posted on the other board with blockchain reading and screenshots from big mining members from this board accusing evan to have big blockchains manipulated that only him can mine these blackchains with high value.Its not a secret he posted also about his whole datacenter which will mine for coins.Posting a single link about the new coin and the info you can also gain from this board makes it look very legit when knowing that over 90% have been mined in the first month.Also the bribe to Bill Still sponsored by Evan and the biggest wallet with the big moves from hundred of smaller wallets.It shows instantly that  coins has been shared in subaccounts so people wont be able to recognize that everything is from a single wallet.Coins has been traded also in volume thats correct but not in such a way that would legit 60% in under 100 wallets and when looking at the subwallets you can be sure its way more than just 60%.Tell me what would happen if the guy with the 30 milion coin wallet decide to dump all his coins ?The coin would instantly stop existing.
and all investors expect him would loose 99% of their money value not important at which lvl they bought these coins.
So you want to own digital coins where a single person will/can decide about the value about your coins ?I guess thats from one banker shit into another bigger shit since having such big amounts of a coins he is getting the new institution who dictates the rules.
Another issue which i personly have is that quark propagated as alternative to the banksters and fiatmoney.Right at the moment i can tell you the fiat money is way more secure than crypto and crypto is so easy to be taken over by the government which is just a joke.I'm asking myself as a tech guy how people can belive in such a nonsense that crypto is save and most important annonym.
You guys really think crypto is annonym?
Bitcoin was being used by the banksters to flood china with uncontrolled money thats why china and russia banned bitcoin.Why do you think
big western companies and banks are now joining bitcoin ?Because they can't control it ? Or maybe because they use it as trojan horse to implement their wet dreams with a world wide digital currency .It amazes me how for a small profit people are pushing digitatal currency themself and claiming its save against government and banks and can be used everywhere.I'm really asking if people are that dumb or if they sell their freedom of money for a small profit with cryptos.
You say it was a dumb move to invest at the high.The question is who recommended at that time to invest into quark ?It was nobody else than bill still for getting a bribe,evan with a sponsored article on reuters and max keiser who claimed quark will be the next bitcoin and is good for people safing.People invested by being blannded to make a killing in a quick time.Nobody invested in quark for longtime only for a quick profit as everybody speculated that after bill still and max keiser the price will explode.

So you really think even if people would trust crypto again that they would rejoin quark after the big mess the staff did with quark for a quick profit?

It is so blatantly obvious Quark was not premined or instamined as you can see the announcement and look at the mining history.  There are valid topic to criticize Quark about so not sure why anyone would continue to attack fantasy topics like a non existant pre-mine.

At the time it was released it did have the fastest mining period with a 6month total with an exponential decreasing structure, this could be called instamining except if you read the initial pages of the Quark thread it was 'en masse' instamined by many people not by a small dev team prior to public release that is the true definition of instamining.  There was no ninja release etc that goes hand in hand with dev instamining.  And compared to today's coins with mining periods of days any continued claim of instamining is kind of comical.

Quarks history through 2013 isn't unlike many of the other currencies released in that time period.  As the days turned to weeks many people lost interest in mining as new coins were popping up quickly and it was a smart strategy to hop from one to the next and mine hard and fast while diff was low hoping to ride the Cryptsy initial listing profitability waves.   From August-Nov not many people gave a shit about Quark mining.  Most of the en-masse instaminers sold either when it was first listed on Cryptsy (as usual for 99.9% of coins listed...the wave: list..price rally...big dump...price decline).  During this post wave period there were not many GPU miners as Smolens Smelter program was the only one available and many did not trust it, those that did made more Quark during this period than even in the low difficulty initial days...anyone could have used it it was 100% a personal choice...boohoo if you didn't.  Also during this period of gradual price decline many other holders would sell on the price blips when it went from 150 to 200 sat or so, look at the huge daily quantity volumes back then on Cryptsy.  The massive rise at the end of Nov in Quark and most other alts was unexpected and unfortunately short lived.  Most, maybe ALL, of the alts that had stratospheric increase in price have also retracted in prices in a similar fashion.  Yes that sucks for people who bought at the high...but it was a pretty obvious bad move to buy in in the midst of a un-natural looking 10000% price rise in 2 days...  I'm not too happy myself with the price right now but I wouldn't say it is that much different than many of the other Alts that have followed the same trend (ie most alts I hold are worth ~10x less BTC (or worse) than they were at the beginning of Dec 2013, some down far far more than Quark  ).  I also think looking at prices in this goofy trading market today isn't indicative of where things will be in a more matured state in the future.  The crypto trading market is a crowded market now ruled by ADHD traders that jump from coin to coin on almost an hourly basis, only way for a crypto to grow in a healthy way in this climate is to actually become useful outside of daytrading through services and links with business etc.  Quark is making some good progress in that direction so as long as work continues in that direction I remain optimistic.

This idea of creating a 'competition' coin that is really an obvious 'get it on Mintpal' pump and dump coin with an extra bonus IPO scam is sounding worse and worse.  Originally the idea was put forth as a companion coin that would compliment Quark and as a byproduct increase interest in Quark, now it looks like little more than a scammy exit strategy for those looking to jump ship.

New ? Maybe not... Style is familiar to me. Motive however is unclear.

Thule was the handle of a remarkably consistent critic of QRK. He was very persistent when we started the QRK forum in Nov., and so far, the price decline in some ways proves him right.

Can you elaborate on that?

If Quark was premined you should be able to provide proof. Where is your proof? I only see assumptions over assumptions. Fact is, Quark was initially mined faster than most other coins before and this lead people to call it premined, even stating nonsense like 99% of all coins were already mined. While I agree, that there was propaganda and people talking nonsense (like with basically all Altcoins) I can only tell you that, that you are unfortunately in the same boat sitting next to them.

Just my real handle.Older members will be able to admit that.

The main issue is you are trying to bring out a new coin with good features which will take the loss of the quark holders.But please explain to me why should investors of the new coin agree to give part of their coin value to the worthless quark coins ?Most important quark is premined even they claim its not with big wallets.Why should the new investors trust these premine scammers if they already proofed at quark that they will dump their big wallet instantly when the price has a nice value like $0.2 .The daily nightly dumps of big coins are a known fact.Now you still know that there exist at least 60% in big wallets which has a value of arround $50.000.000 if they would dumb it at $0.2 .This would mean that new investors need to pay minimum $50.000.000 to buy just the big wallets who just want to make a quick profit which they "earned" with mining in a single month.
And i doubt NORMAL holders are willing to sell there quarks for $0.02 which still will be $5.000.000

euhh thule quark was announced at 11:24am EST, July 21 2013

The genesis block can be seen to have been mined shortly thereafter at 12:01pm, July 21, 2013, no wonder they called u troll

So there is no premine, also people agree that a short amount of premine is alright which gives devs funds to work with. If you want to attack coins go attack these coins:

darkcoin: 40% instamined in the first day, blackcoin 100% instamined in the first week, NXT 100% instamined and given to few people, vertcoin 600,000 instamined in 30 hours and the list goes on, even bitcoin pre mined 1m, so go get em