Topic: [ANN] QRL - Announcing the Quantum Resistant Ledger - page 6. (Read 186381 times)

500 I believe. It's a choice made by Bittrex.

How many confirmations does Bittrex need to confirm my transaction..its 300 and still says pending...

Well, you could ask your shitdevs. But then again, they’d probably answer they hash their pub keys so no one could use the full pub key to derive the private key from. Which is BS, because all transactions will eventually carry the full pub key which creates the opportunity to do so anyway. Network based attacks, or off network MITM attacks would always be a possibility to get to the full pub key, so only if a blockchain uses a quantum resistant signature scheme (not as an option, but as the only vallid signature scheme), then you would know if your shitcoin is quantum resistant.

Quantum computers give way to new (quantum) algorithms that can make faster calculations and need fewer steps to come to an answer. If you use different type of signature schemes, these algorithms are not able to find the answer, even by using a quantum computer. These are quantum resistant signature schemes. If we move away from the subject shitcoins and talk QRL, you will see QRL used XMSS as a quantum resistant signature scheme. See for reference here: https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/484.pdf

NIST is holding a competition from which they expect to come to standardization of the best quantum resistant cryptography. The outcome of that competition will be somewhere around the year 2022-2024. That will take a while. XMSS however, is not part of that competition because it requires the system that you use it for to keep state. Not all systems can do so fully guaranteed. The outcome of the NIST competition should be a type of cryptography that can be used wide spread, so also for systems that can’t keep track of state. For blockchain however, it is possible to keep state if XMSS is implemented correctly. For QRL this is the case. They have an advisor Leon Groot Bruinderink, who is a post-quantum cryptography expert with a PhD on the matter. Also QRL has had two external audits. So that’s solid. Going back to NIST: they likely will standardize XMSS for a specific group of applications that can deal with the statefull properties. See for reference here: https://csrc.nist.gov/news/2019/stateful-hbs-request-for-public-comments As you see Bruinderink is mentioned in the NIST article. Note that the request for comments is to provide guidance for protection of misuse, and specific characterization of advisable usecases. The part where we wonder if it actuallyy is quantum resistant is in the past. It is considered to provide provable quantum resistant security.
This will mean XMSS and LMS will quite likely be the first quantum resistant signature schemes to be standardized. Which is huge as you might imagine.

How do you know if your shitcoin is actually quantum resistant?

Does anyone know the spot market where can buy QRL without KYC and identification? Upbit and bittrex it is necessary to pass KYC, forkdelta no orders....

QRL not to blame because their chain has very new APIs. But they need to step up adoption efforts.

Hello QRL Staff, Miners and Holders,

I just opened QRL mining pool. Pool location is Europe / Germany.

Here is some pool features:

- PROP Payment System.
- Per Rig Stats.
- TLS Ports.
- Exchange Wallet Support.
- Email notification system.
- Configurable minimal payout.
- Xmr-node-proxy support.
- Dynamic or Fixed Difficulty.


Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) Mining Pool [/quote]

Not if the marketing is geared towards adoption by project developers, technocrats and hedgers.

Well, I don't think this guy costs a lot of money. 

But I agree the visible marketing is the weak point of QRL right now. But at the same time, they don't have a huge stack of $ and the value of marketing is temporary, while the value of development is long term. And long term is what they aim at. They have to, because they are the solution for something that is 5 to 20 years away.
Doing some great marketing, pushing their name, but in five years running out of money putting the project to a stop is even worse than lacking marketing in this early phase. Also every $ spent now would be worth x 5 or 10 later since they have their funds in BTC and ETH. So that would be tenfold waste of money.

Investing in QRL now, is early investing. This is your long term bag.

Someone who touts this in a blurb he wrote about himself: His educational background is in the Liberal Arts, with a Bachelor of the Arts in Anthropology and a Bachelor of the Arts in American Studies from the University of Massachusetts. This background has helped Adam to develop the tools to articulate many of the at-times complicated concepts surrounding the technology to audiences of varying levels of technical background. He believes that true adoption for cutting-edge technology is only possible in the context of a basic level of comprehension.

You're right, Dezeyay. This kind of marketing is just a waste of money.

That is where you are wrong. You don't ever "time the market" to shout your credentials. Crypto is shaking up and consolidation is happening. You need adoption by the technocrats. So far, the marketing looks and sounds like an angsty college science project, instead of flexing QRL's serious technical muscles.

If not now, when?

QRL conference report: "we've been busy marketing, to the point of weariness."  Elsewhere: "we're not really marketing."  Pick a side, QRL. Which one is it?

Sammy still a 12 year old high on energy drinks I see. Don't know what you still do around here hating this project so much.

Marketing in the state the crypto market is right now is just a waste of money.

You are right that the marketing strategy seems to be status quo, ho-hum, move along. In this space, just not enough. The so-called conference reports are self-damaging, resembling the ramblings of a navel-gazer on weed than paid, professional output.

As for the mythical 51% attack, I'm guessing you want in on it?  

Thank you so much for your help, I will do so , Good to know we have till late Feb to do it!

Just to be clear: The Ethereum Token you seem to be in possesion of is not the mainnet quantum secure coin. It is just an eth token. But you can migrate the token via the link to the qrl mainnet coin.

So if you want to migrate your eth token it usually takes 24-48h to do migration and than you can send the mainnet qrl to bittrex.

I personally don´t have a problem with the timeframe they gave for migration.

Happy I could (can?) be of help

Thanks I wanted to send it to bittrex but the wallet address for QRL there is not erc address anymore, so i can not send it as my QRL is ERC token in my etherum wallet, They should give more time to send  it to bittrex

Hi Guys,

don´t worry, your time to migrate to mainnet is not over. It will be possible until Feb 28, 2019.
(Afterwards it still will be possible, but only through contacting the devs. Try the discord for that.)

to migrate please follow (there´s also the discordllink on this page):

https://docs.theqrl.org/tokenmigration/guide/

(I´m not from the qrl Team)

I have the same problem and I was not informed, this is not right

Please managment can you answer my question? dont you have telegram?