What about wallet show trade volume?
You mean BTC volume from an exchange? Yes we can have that fetched from the exchange API.
Topic: [ANN] [SFR] SaffronCoin | Latest Version - 1.4.2/2.6.2 | Mandatory Wallet Update - page 150. (Read 437833 times)
July 16, 2014, 09:29:25 AM
You mean BTC volume from an exchange? Yes we can have that fetched from the exchange API.
July 16, 2014, 09:28:14 AM
Dev it is the best time to move to the moderated thread. Once people start noticing and our community starts growing, it will create suspicion and FUDs will also have one more allegation to make. FUDs are really dangerous for success of any coin.
Moving to self moderated thread will be worse for the coin than any FUD that people can throw at it. Also losing ~90 pages on the official thread does not seam like a good idea.
You can go ahead and start your own moderated thread.
We have discussed it as a community and most of the members are in favour of it. It is not a worse idea in fact best one. FUDs are really dangerous as I have seen in many coins, they definitely affect the growth of coin. Latest examples are XC,URO,VRC and many more. Whenever coins start becoming successful, people start to create confusion in investors mind. We don't want that to happen with SFR as it took us lot of time to recover from one blow,even we have not recovered yet. And tell me what's the harm of moving to moderated thread? We community members know SFR Dev from starting and trust him fully.
I agree with both of you. We will also be having a separate forum created for SaffronCoin. This ANN thread is also very important because it has the records of developments and progress right from start. Discussions can go on a dedicated SFR forum as well as this thread and a moderated one. We need to keep all options open.
July 16, 2014, 09:14:21 AM
What about wallet show trade volume?
July 16, 2014, 08:53:18 AM
Dev it is the best time to move to the moderated thread. Once people start noticing and our community starts growing, it will create suspicion and FUDs will also have one more allegation to make. FUDs are really dangerous for success of any coin.
Moving to self moderated thread will be worse for the coin than any FUD that people can throw at it. Also losing ~90 pages on the official thread does not seam like a good idea.
You can go ahead and start your own moderated thread.
We have discussed it as a community and most of the members are in favour of it. It is not a worse idea in fact best one. FUDs are really dangerous as I have seen in many coins, they definitely affect the growth of coin. Latest examples are XC,URO,VRC and many more. Whenever coins start becoming successful, people start to create confusion in investors mind. We don't want that to happen with SFR as it took us lot of time to recover from one blow,even we have not recovered yet. And tell me what's the harm of moving to moderated thread? We community members know SFR Dev from starting and trust him fully.
July 16, 2014, 08:38:11 AM
Dev it is the best time to move to the moderated thread. Once people start noticing and our community starts growing, it will create suspicion and FUDs will also have one more allegation to make. FUDs are really dangerous for success of any coin.
Moving to self moderated thread will be worse for the coin than any FUD that people can throw at it. Also losing ~90 pages on the official thread does not seam like a good idea.
You can go ahead and start your own moderated thread.
July 16, 2014, 08:31:51 AM
Dev it is the best time to move to the moderated thread. Once people start noticing and our community starts growing, it will create suspicion and FUDs will also have one more allegation to make. FUDs are really dangerous for success of any coin.
July 16, 2014, 08:13:51 AM
Saffron just keeps getting better and better
So lets go to the Mars
July 16, 2014, 07:57:39 AM
Yea both will have different buttons. Alias one would have a separate dialog to send.
July 16, 2014, 07:55:11 AM
My personal suggestion too. How about SFRSend and SFRPROSend for both the versions respectively?
Sounds nice. Just make sure both can be clearly differentiated so that it never creates even a bit of confusion. How about writing it like this SfrProSend just to make clear. 😊
July 16, 2014, 07:41:09 AM
My personal suggestion too. How about SFRSend and SFRPROSend for both the versions respectively?
July 16, 2014, 07:07:50 AM
What about this name SFR ALIASsend or ALIASsend or SAFFRONsend. Just few suggestions.
Saffronsend is ok but it could be quite big.
The normal anonymity can be known as SFRSend. We just need to think of a name for the alias one. Or we can just assign a version number.
SFRASend?
July 16, 2014, 06:27:02 AM
Saffron just keeps getting better and better
July 16, 2014, 06:24:18 AM
We will be including a tiny feature too that would be helpful to a few people.
Some of you might send screenshots of your wallet to others. But you might not want your balance and transactions to be displayed. So you would edit your screenshot and then send it to someone. To minimize this effort, now with the click of a button, all your balances and your transactions will be hidden and replaced with a text "CLOAKED". It would also be useful if you do not want snooping eyes over your shoulder especially when you use SFRMS or check the tweetbox and not worrying about people around u having a look at your "stack" in public places such as offices.
Many of us wouldn't require this. But some would. This is also a "light" feature so it wouldn't increase the size of the wallet by a great deal.
Some of you might send screenshots of your wallet to others. But you might not want your balance and transactions to be displayed. So you would edit your screenshot and then send it to someone. To minimize this effort, now with the click of a button, all your balances and your transactions will be hidden and replaced with a text "CLOAKED". It would also be useful if you do not want snooping eyes over your shoulder especially when you use SFRMS or check the tweetbox and not worrying about people around u having a look at your "stack" in public places such as offices.
Many of us wouldn't require this. But some would. This is also a "light" feature so it wouldn't increase the size of the wallet by a great deal.
July 16, 2014, 06:07:10 AM
SFRBit will have some constraints for the first few days.
The min. amount of BTC you can send is 0.0005 per transaction.
The max. amount of BTC you can send is 0.1 per transaction.
The max. amount will be increased later.
The min. amount of BTC you can send is 0.0005 per transaction.
The max. amount of BTC you can send is 0.1 per transaction.
The max. amount will be increased later.
July 16, 2014, 05:19:11 AM
I am so glad I got involved with SFR, I don't hold much but glad I got what I did. You guys are killing it with all these features!!!
Great job:-)
Great job:-)
Thank you for the support mate.
July 16, 2014, 05:18:10 AM
What about this name SFR ALIASsend or ALIASsend or SAFFRONsend. Just few suggestions.
Saffronsend is ok but it could be quite big.
The normal anonymity can be known as SFRSend. We just need to think of a name for the alias one. Or we can just assign a version number.
July 16, 2014, 12:51:21 AM
I am so glad I got involved with SFR, I don't hold much but glad I got what I did. You guys are killing it with all these features!!!
Great job:-)
Great job:-)
July 15, 2014, 08:55:39 PM
What about this name SFR ALIASsend or ALIASsend or SAFFRONsend. Just few suggestions.
July 15, 2014, 08:47:23 PM
Great Work Devs , looking forward to the release.
July 15, 2014, 08:42:15 PM
Hey guys, we are pleased to say that our SFRBit has just been successfully tested. We tested it by sending some amount to an exchange.
There is some final cleaning up of the code and some final testing left. After that we will start work on SFRSend, our method to anonymize transactions by bouncing the transaction.
We will have 2 versions of SFRSend. We don't know what to name it as of yet. But the normal version would function as any normal anonymity send feature. Another version would be even more anonymous since u wouldn't know the recipient's address. You can anonymously send SFR to that person only by knowing his/her alias. Thanks to vipin for this suggestion.
But for this version of anonymity, you need to activate SFRMS in your wallet and choose an alias so it is paired with your SFR address.
More detail once we start working on it.
We could have the next wallet release this Weekend if everything goes well!
There is another very unique feature that we have thought of that would be an asset for many SFR users. The development time for this is a bit more so this won't be included in the upcoming wallet but would very well be in the one after this.
This is the screenshot of the SFRBit client :
There is some final cleaning up of the code and some final testing left. After that we will start work on SFRSend, our method to anonymize transactions by bouncing the transaction.
We will have 2 versions of SFRSend. We don't know what to name it as of yet. But the normal version would function as any normal anonymity send feature. Another version would be even more anonymous since u wouldn't know the recipient's address. You can anonymously send SFR to that person only by knowing his/her alias. Thanks to vipin for this suggestion.
But for this version of anonymity, you need to activate SFRMS in your wallet and choose an alias so it is paired with your SFR address.
More detail once we start working on it.
We could have the next wallet release this Weekend if everything goes well!
There is another very unique feature that we have thought of that would be an asset for many SFR users. The development time for this is a bit more so this won't be included in the upcoming wallet but would very well be in the one after this.
This is the screenshot of the SFRBit client :
This will be the most advantages of coins
Jump to: