Why burning tokens is not fair?
For example, imagine the company is selling 50% of a total amount of 100 million tokens (hypothetically). Now imagine that due to tricky conditions of the market they are able to sell only 10% of those tokens for sale. This means that effectively they sell only 5% of tokens (10% of that 50% for sale). The rest is burned, so now we are in the situation that the company holds 50 million of tokens when the token sale participants hold only 5 million. This situation could create problems of trust within the community regarding the price of the token, which could be manipulated by the company. And of course, this wouldn’t happen if the company redistributed the unsold tokens among the token sale participants.
The approach that has been chosen now makes sense. What does not make sense it to say that the price would drop 5 times, what's your calculation behind that if you have even done that? And by the way if you have 5 times the tokens then a drop in price doesn't matter.