It's probably good that this coin isn't listed. PoW attacks can happen and exchanges robbed. There could be a really good future for this coin if it's able to switch to PoS a week or more before Ethereum switches over. Then once the network is working securely, open trading back up on bittrex.
Casper proof of stake consensus is the future. PoW works better if there is only 1 biggest chain with all the PoW security behind it. Smaller coins are better off using PoS. It's actually the best way for this coin to proceed.
Ive read a fair bit about the Casper protocols, and id rather wait until after ETH switches over and deals with the likely bugs to the system, or at least deals with the eleventyseven million questions everyone will have, and why theyre not staking blocks and...and... etc ad nauseum.. *BUT* Proof of Stake would be the truly responsible direction for SOILcoin in the simple idea of energy savings to keep the blockchain in motion. ive loved the innovations on some of the hybrid Pow/PoS currencies, but being most of those also maintain a "naive Proof of Stake" they dont trly address potential attack vectors.
i do like the idea that a malicious attack against the blockchain would cause the loss of the attacker's staked currency, although i havent found out exactly where those penalized funds go, either to a burn address or an equal redistribution among participative wallets perhaps? anyhow. the time required to set up enough wallets as security deposit holding stakes in order to force an attack on the chain would be too costly to implement, and likely far too time consuming to keep up.
buterin had projected late 2017 as the release, but from what ive looked at with the protocols they seem decent. the parameters in Casper4 have 7 second block times, which would be near instantaneous transaction throughput, and what works out to a 4.5% APR which is sustainable (humorously enough, it works out to 0.01234% daily). ETHs current monetary (supply) inflation rate is at about 18.8% annually.
those sorts of block time parameters would be very beneficial to SOIL, although i do feel we would also benefit by offering a higher APR to increase supply, as i think ANY changeover to PoS would be received with strong positive market momentum. the question there becomes what makes a PoS currency attractive, and for which reasons?
high interest paying PoS coins supper from eventual hyperinflation which drives the price down (not that SOIL couldve gone much lower than it was at delisting) and im absolutely positive that we'll see more than a few ETH clones pop up after the advent of the Casper protocol advertising near-HYIP level rates. all theyd have to do is move the block interest rate from 0.000001 to 0.0001 and theyve created a currency with 450% APR.
even decent sounding rates of 72% APR (wherein you double your principal in 12 months) would create a massive oversupply. with SOILcoin, we are actually somewhat blessed to have a small circulation of currency that is entirely in the hands of the public. even a high rate of interest (although im not suggesting anything like either of the above examples) would not hurt SOIL if we dont adhere to the original 33million SOIL hard cap.
our current steady distribution model of 1 SOIL per 12 second block produces an average of 2.6million SOIL per year (when the blockchain is running smoothly, and avoiding "difficulty ice ages" which our mainnet homestead switchover should alleviate) is about 50%. we could maintain that sort of level (say 45%) of supply inflation (or 228day avg balance-ROI), which would actually appear more attractive to investors.
anyhow, our switch to PoS will be something i hope the community embraces when we have the opportunity to do so, but i do think we have to have some good discussions behind the economy of doing so, and getting out on the exchanges again is a higher priority. its a shame that novaexchange precluded us based on the mother-chain protocol, but hopefully we will have a presence via an android p2p exchange (something similar to coinswap) and multi-wallet platform very soon. not QUITE an exchange but still the opportunity to divest of SOILcoin into other cryptocurrencies or the other way around. ive been speaking with the developer of one f these projects and as they already maintain ETH on their system, adding us wouldnt be much of an issue. hoping to hear back from him this weekend. we remain somewhat hampered tehre by the lack of traditional centralized market presence. ive emailed ritchie from bittrex again, as our wallets are still functioning with bittrex, and the chain is running. hoping he might allow for a smaller daily average volume to begin with for us, something along the lines of what was in place previously (0.2BTC/day over 7 day average).