Yep. The team might want to consider moving on to a self-moderated thread, so they can delete his posts and those of other FUDers like him, just like ICONOMI did when they were under FUD attack 6 months ago.
That's ridiculous. A self-moderated thread would be the worst choice for showing transparency, openness and goodwill, as are reasonably expected by investors, and would look like a convenient way to get rid of legitimate criticism on the excuse of fighting FUD.
I'm no FUDer at all, and think anybody can spot FUD and tell it apart from criticism. Yet as any other investor who put their coins into this ICO, I feel totally disappointed by the very unprofessional behavior the team has shown so far, by the lack of communication, the non existing support, let alone their TWO WEEKS long struggle to sort out the mess with bonus and bounties...
We have the full right to express without censorship our criticism and concern about the present situation, actually I see the same concern in the market itself, as shown by the current lower price. I'm long with my tokens, so I tend to disregard short term fluctuations, but I'd expect some sign of real commitment and a more professional attitude by a company which raised over $40m, and still has to prove they're able to fulfil their promises.
i dont wont to read the last pages. but after reading you post in think that the devs are still silent and nothing had happened. or did they deliver something?
The only relevant entries I see on their blog since the ICO, are about a short Roadmap Overview, which points to the very same document they already published as their white paper. So nothing new for the past two weeks, except they are still manually calculating the bonus to apply to non-ETH payments, as their system didn't work during the ICO.
So we are FUDers, we are trying to lower the prices of the assets we are holding, makes sense... great logic guys, way to go!!
These idiots calling us FUDers would be in the very same positions if something went wrong in their coin-flip scheme, they are freaking out and forgetting about transparency, community, etc. These are the things that make stable and high valuation, not silly cheer-leading.
Hey sycophants, can you read? We are trying to sort this thing out for two weeks but we don't get replies, or we get conflicting information, or plain lies, that's why we are going public. Do you wanna help (yourself included)? Go in slack and emails and pressure them to sort this shit out and some DEV to come here in public to give precise information to the community and
compromise, I promise you this won't push down the price even more, it will do exactly the opposite.