Author

Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs - page 576. (Read 1260354 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Quote
If you create a file called /etc/mg_ignore_110_fcc the FW will not limit the 1100W. Note that this mode of work is not well tested by me, and can cause extreme heat in some cables. Make sure you have proper cables that match the amperage of the system. We take no responsibility of any damage done to the miner, PSU or your house if you set this flag. The PSU supports up to 14.5 Amper, so make the proper computation (and don't forget to add 10% to SP10 limit for PSU efficiency).

Can you give us some values to play with then?


You have to know the cables you have. There are 16A cables sold in stores. PSU supports 14.5A which is your limit. You have 110V.

14.5 * 110V = 1595W
PSU efficiency in 110V is ~85%, so your limit is 1595*0.85 is over 1300W, so it looks like assuming you have 16A cables you are clear to go. But if your voltage is 100V (which can happen) then you are limited more.

Just make sure you have 16A cables.

I have 240V - One miner is pulling is 224V and the other 227V. I guess this is for 110V guys?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Quote
If you create a file called /etc/mg_ignore_110_fcc the FW will not limit the 1100W. Note that this mode of work is not well tested by me, and can cause extreme heat in some cables. Make sure you have proper cables that match the amperage of the system. We take no responsibility of any damage done to the miner, PSU or your house if you set this flag. The PSU supports up to 14.5 Amper, so make the proper computation (and don't forget to add 10% to SP10 limit for PSU efficiency).

Can you give us some values to play with then?


You have to know the cables you have. There are 16A cables sold in stores. PSU supports 14.5A which is your limit. You have 110V.

14.5 * 110V = 1595W
PSU efficiency in 110V is ~85%, so your limit is 1595*0.85 is over 1300W, so it looks like assuming you have 16A cables you are clear to go. But if your voltage is 100V (which can happen) then you are limited more.

Just make sure you have 16A cables.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Quote
If you create a file called /etc/mg_ignore_110_fcc the FW will not limit the 1100W. Note that this mode of work is not well tested by me, and can cause extreme heat in some cables. Make sure you have proper cables that match the amperage of the system. We take no responsibility of any damage done to the miner, PSU or your house if you set this flag. The PSU supports up to 14.5 Amper, so make the proper computation (and don't forget to add 10% to SP10 limit for PSU efficiency).

Can you give us some values to play with then?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I can see how you might have missed it, though.  There was a bunch of other stuff going on regarding CBCM and SP-Tech.

Oops! You are right - I am blind Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
Apparently Zvi is too buzy to post here Tongue

By mistake clicked upgrade and woot - new version.

Blog post is up with new features:
http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/blogs/technical-blog/14433873-version-1-4-2


Ummm...


I can see how you might have missed it, though.  There was a bunch of other stuff going on regarding CBCM and SP-Tech.

Zvi, I really like the disclaimer at the end of your post Grin

Quote
If you create a file called /etc/mg_ignore_110_fcc the FW will not limit the 1100W. Note that this mode of work is not well tested by me, and can cause extreme heat in some cables. Make sure you have proper cables that match the amperage of the system. We take no responsibility of any damage done to the miner, PSU or your house if you set this flag. The PSU supports up to 14.5 Amper, so make the proper computation (and don't forget to add 10% to SP10 limit for PSU efficiency).

Here's a way to disable the safety measures we put in place.  Don't blame us if you burn down your house Wink
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
BTW Zvi, time in the graphs not fixed.

Time in miner say 16:06 but the graph legend says 13:00. Don't know if it is meant by design.

We still are looking at the graphs timezone issue, and will provide a solution soon.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
1.21 GIGA WATTS

hi zvisha,

Thanks for new firmware.

I upgraded first SP10 miner to 1.4.2 and worked fine

then tried it on another SP10 and got message below

Code:
Beginning upgrade 1.4.2. Please wait, this can take up to 1 minute.
Downloading url:http://firmware.spondoolies-tech.com/release/download
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing 'Spondoolies Software'
Upgrading 1.4.2 to 1.4.2 ...Cannot move u-boot.img to u-boot.old

any idea why and how to fix?

EDIT.  tried second time and worked.  Grin
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Apparently Zvi is too buzy to post here Tongue

By mistake clicked upgrade and woot - new version.

Blog post is up with new features:
http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/blogs/technical-blog/14433873-version-1-4-2


BTW Zvi, time in the graphs not fixed.

Time in miner say 16:06 but the graph legend says 13:00. Don't know if it is meant by design.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Wink No problem.

SECOND BATCH -  6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! WOOT!

Cheesy

wouldn't have been allowed to change that in the UK; bloody nanny state we live in!

BFL would have a hard time doing biz in the UK. I can see the purpose for it at times.

indeed, chances are our old pal Josh would most likely have been in court and either fined/sent to jail by now... certainly in Scotland; he'd have been linched by a mob of angry miners!  Cool
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Wink No problem.

SECOND BATCH -  6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! WOOT!

Cheesy

wouldn't have been allowed to change that in the UK; bloody nanny state we live in!

BFL would have a hard time doing biz in the UK. I can see the purpose for it at times.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Apparently Zvi is too buzy to post here Tongue

By mistake clicked upgrade and woot - new version.

Blog post is up with new features:
http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/blogs/technical-blog/14433873-version-1-4-2
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Small question, as I didn't want to go through the mass amount of pages, but would there be a discount for ordering large bulk of your coming out product? (talking 100+ amounts of SP 30)

Best if you contact our sales directly with this question, at [email protected].

Alright, thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Wink No problem.

SECOND BATCH -  6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! WOOT!

Cheesy

wouldn't have been allowed to change that in the UK; bloody nanny state we live in!
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Small question, as I didn't want to go through the mass amount of pages, but would there be a discount for ordering large bulk of your coming out product? (talking 100+ amounts of SP 30)

Best if you contact our sales directly with this question, at [email protected].
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
 Wink No problem.

SECOND BATCH -  6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! WOOT!
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
Wondering about the SP30's.

SECOND BATCH - 5.4TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-second-batch
SEPTEMBER BATCH - 6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-september-batch-1

Are the August SP30s going to be 6 or 5.4Th/s?
Why are they different on the website?

Thanks for pointing out, we corrected it on the site.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Wondering about the SP30's.

SECOND BATCH - 5.4TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-second-batch
SEPTEMBER BATCH - 6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-september-batch-1

Are the August SP30s going to be 6 or 5.4Th/s?
Why are they different on the website?


Maybe the case that SP-Tech didn't realise the SP30 would be ~6TH/s until after the second batch was listed and sold (consider trade specifications, a company can't change the specification of an item after it's sale - I am sure there are laws in most countries which would stop them doing so)

I think we can safely assume all SP30 batches will be the same spec +/- 10%, and it's most likely the trading standards laws which would stop SP-Tech from changing the spec on the page of 2nd batch.

I may be wrong though, as I know not much about Israel trading standards laws.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Small question, as I didn't want to go through the mass amount of pages, but would there be a discount for ordering large bulk of your coming out product? (talking 100+ amounts of SP 30)
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Wondering about the SP30's.

SECOND BATCH - 5.4TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-second-batch
SEPTEMBER BATCH - 6 TH/S OF PURE MINING POWER! http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-september-batch-1

Are the August SP30s going to be 6 or 5.4Th/s?
Why are they different on the website?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Code:
[quote author=Archibald Chikungunya link=topic=521520.msg7249604#msg7249604 date=1402488789]
[quote author=cbcm.co link=topic=521520.msg7246979#msg7246979 date=1402476210]
[quote author=Archibald Chikungunya link=topic=521520.msg7246353#msg7246353 date=1402473074]
What exactly is legit? this hair brain scheme, this attempt? certainly you
don't mean two penniless east europeans who cannot even scrape together
100,000 dollars between them to buy 35 SP's. They need to start this all off
by raising a meager 100,000 dollars? 90% of the drivel in their little "prospectus"
consists of trading off the name of Spondoolies-Tech. That's all they talk about.
As though your promise to supply them equipment if they are successful to raise
money and their promise to buy your equipmentif they are sucessful to raise money,
somehow makes this scheme legit? How about I actual buy your product then of
parcel it out as shares, without even having to mention who I bought it from.
And from there I buy more. This scheme will never success in the sphere of the
bitcoin miners and buyer, this community is far to clever for that. It is geared
towards more the sleezy  cloudhasing rubbish aimed at the clueless out there,
but this time round with a sophisticated twist to appeal to the clued in miners
and traders of bitcoins.

I truly hope that is what you mean and are not in fact endorsing the attempted
operation, thepeople, the company itself.
[/quote]

Welcome to our main IPO thread: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647360]https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647360[/url]
And please use Your main account to discuss, but not newbie one.
[/quote]

I most certainly will but before we do that explain to me this cunningly used  
word "partnership" all over the prospectus?

[quote]The Partnership
CBCM has a partnership with Spondoolies-Tech to deliver their SP 10 devices in June.


Agreements
CBCM has reached a partnership agreements with Spondoolies-Tech to provide mining equipment[/quote]


According to the owner of Spondoolies; it is quite simple if you raise the funds you can
buy the goods. Anyone can buy the goods if they have the money, yet you've carefully
submitted the words "agreements" and "partnerships" in the prospectus to make it appear
as Spondoolie-Tech is some how involved further than simply exchanging their hardware for monies.

[quote author=Spondoolies-Tech ]Assuming their first round will be a success, we'll cover
it with 35 SP10s we removed from our stock.[/quote]

Yet you persist to use the following throughout the prospectus:

[i]The Partnership Agreements[/i]

which are:

[quote]Articles of partnership is a voluntary contract between two or among more than
two persons to place their capital, labor, and skills, and corporation in business with the
understanding that there will be a sharing of the profits and losses between/among
partners. Outside of North America, it is normally referred to simply as a partnership
agreement.[/quote]
[/quote]

Can you take all this over to the other thread?

Seriously not really why people come here to read pages and pages interrogatives.
Jump to: