Author

Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 132. (Read 810098 times)

newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Sock puppet ignored~  Wink

Yea i shove the sock up your mum's **** where you came from. Wink


happy to see my old post surfacing again~  Grin

Aren't you happy you have a fellow 5 year old to lick your balls.  Grin Oh wait, you might have came from the same ****. You found your long lost brother ! Cheesy
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials.
Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again.
Well since you have a dick,show us your dick,otherwise we'll believe you are an eunuch.Is this your stupid logic ?

Connection Info: sgminer -o http://mine3.spr.nonce-pool.com:4400 -u username.worker -p password

Currently payouts run once every 24 hours.

Contributor Shares
Rank    Donor    User Name    Shares
1       antonio8    20,944
2       zorbo    6,546
3       Admin    3,216
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
Contributor Hashrates
Rank    Donor    User Name    KH/s    SPR/Day
1       antonio8    18,483    43.405
2       zorbo    7,298    17.139
3       Admin    3,607    8.471
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
General Statistics
Pool Hash Rate    24830.280 KH/s
Pool Efficiency    97.91%
Current Active Workers    4
Current Difficulty    53.50000638
Est. Next Difficulty    50.71192957 (Change in 1 Blocks)
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)    1 minute 3 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)    2 hours 31 minutes 30 seconds
Est. Shares this Round    13696 (done: 224.2%)
Next Network Block    253,318    (Current: 253,317)
Last Block Found    253,088
Time Since Last Block    4 hours 7 minutes 31 seconds
These stats are also available in JSON format HERE
Last Found Blocks
Block    Finder    Time    Actual Shares
253088    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:49:09    3,460
253049    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:20:48    1,346
253034    zorbo    02/04/2015 14:10:04    36,500
252676    antonio8    02/04/2015 08:05:13    777
252665    Admin    02/04/2015 07:56:53    2,237
252639    antonio8    02/04/2015 07:33:26    908
252624    zorbo    02/04/2015 07:24:00    60,917
252271    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 01:34:55    9,744
252230    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 00:56:25    14,016
252196    zorbo    02/04/2015 00:01:22    9,705
Note: Round Earnings are not credited until 140 confirms.








The solid proof of the existence of pools.  Wink

happy to see my old post surfacing again~  Grin
full member
Activity: 202
Merit: 100
Planned max # of MN is 1440, with 1440 MNs, per MN should receive 30% of one mined block per day.
The payout is the same for MN with 10k SPR or 1k SPR. But you have to monitor regularly to make sure your MN is not de-elected by others who deposit/invest more SPR than your MNs.
To have a better feel, why don't you test it out at testnet : http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93.0
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
Is amount of SPR in masternode affects profitability? Let's say I have two cases: in one I have one masternode with 10000 SPR in it, in other I have 10 masternodes with 1000 SPR in each of them. Will there be any difference in profits?
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials.
Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again.
Well since you have a dick,show us your dick,otherwise we'll believe you are an eunuch.Is this your stupid logic ?

Connection Info: sgminer -o http://mine3.spr.nonce-pool.com:4400 -u username.worker -p password

Currently payouts run once every 24 hours.

Contributor Shares
Rank    Donor    User Name    Shares
1       antonio8    20,944
2       zorbo    6,546
3       Admin    3,216
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
Contributor Hashrates
Rank    Donor    User Name    KH/s    SPR/Day
1       antonio8    18,483    43.405
2       zorbo    7,298    17.139
3       Admin    3,607    8.471
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
General Statistics
Pool Hash Rate    24830.280 KH/s
Pool Efficiency    97.91%
Current Active Workers    4
Current Difficulty    53.50000638
Est. Next Difficulty    50.71192957 (Change in 1 Blocks)
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)    1 minute 3 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)    2 hours 31 minutes 30 seconds
Est. Shares this Round    13696 (done: 224.2%)
Next Network Block    253,318    (Current: 253,317)
Last Block Found    253,088
Time Since Last Block    4 hours 7 minutes 31 seconds
These stats are also available in JSON format HERE
Last Found Blocks
Block    Finder    Time    Actual Shares
253088    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:49:09    3,460
253049    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:20:48    1,346
253034    zorbo    02/04/2015 14:10:04    36,500
252676    antonio8    02/04/2015 08:05:13    777
252665    Admin    02/04/2015 07:56:53    2,237
252639    antonio8    02/04/2015 07:33:26    908
252624    zorbo    02/04/2015 07:24:00    60,917
252271    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 01:34:55    9,744
252230    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 00:56:25    14,016
252196    zorbo    02/04/2015 00:01:22    9,705
Note: Round Earnings are not credited until 140 confirms.








The solid proof of the existence of pools.  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I would like everyone with an opinion about the name change for Masternodes to place it here:
http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=116.0
This seems like a big enough issue that we should discuss it and make it known to Mr. Spread how we feel.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.  

Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.

There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
Masternode is also an ambiguous connotation. It also sounds very centralised. And "node" is an association.

Agreed, spreadnode makes the most sense in my opinion. Our MN are decentralized, or spread apart. Spreadnode. Mastnode means that the masters own it. We should have no masters.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials.
Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.  

Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.

There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
Masternode is also an ambiguous connotation. It also sounds very centralised. And "node" is an association.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

But the thing is you have to have 100% trust in the pool and its users as anyone can take the mined coins/blocks thats the difference with this coin and others, it is a Solo only coin which makes it Decentralized yes you could have pools but once all that big hashrate jumps on there will be a lot of greedy people stealing coins, it's as simple as that when you try to understand SPR.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.  

Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.

There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
sr. member
Activity: 272
Merit: 250
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"

Smartnode is a good name, brilliant ideea to rename MN.

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"

This is also a great idea.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...

Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product.

Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it.

Just wanted to say that I think you summed it up quite well.

Not disrespecting the debate but I'm rolling with that...
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1170
Advertise Here - PM for more info!
Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...

Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product.

Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!

Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?

YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.


Oh goodness...you found a scripture for it. 

Please stop...for all that is Holy!!!

lolz...
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!

Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?

YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

Oh...they tried...https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-launched-jesuscoin-jcc-windows-and-linux-wallet-webfound-399681

I'm still amazed that it didn't go to the moon...but then again, I think people who believe in Jesus don't necessarily believe in the moon...; )

It looks like someone made a joke coin. I'm serious though this could take off. Think about it. You could rip off any coin and few people would dare calling it a shitcoin. Especially if people thought God was backing it. It could not fail.
Jump to: