Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 58. (Read 810098 times)

??

I just figured that if you play with women after drugs and booze, you miss out on so much fun. So, I've decided to reverse the order. Women first, and then the drugs and the booze. Worth a go, don't you think?

What are you talking about.

This is a scam coin.

To avoid being scammed, I'm willing to help you out:

WTB 60k SPR.

I feel this is my public duty to help people. I'm turning over a new leaf. No more drugs, booze and women. No....from now on its women, drugs and then booze, with the odd civic minded purchase of SPR.

PM

He is just excited. The coin is doing well and he has been here awhile.

You really don't need to tell everybody you want to buy,just buy,nobody stops you. 

WTB 4400 SPR for  0.24 btc

I'm glad spreadcoin is being developed further. Hopefully I get in again...


Why didn't I buy when it was at 2k??? 

Thanks for the detail, most useful. The data is all recorded in the blockchain, is amenable to analysis and now that I've got some idea what patterns to look for (thank you), I can get a better understanding of how the distribution has played out thus far.

Cheers

Graham

scam in you head 

The dump made a huge impact on redistribution.

wow,is this scam coin reviving ?? 

Even if there were `large private pools` mining this coin, all of their coins would have been already redistributed on the exchanges. This may have explained for the heavy dumping over the past several weeks. All in all, `private pools` consist of only a few entities that would make as much SPR as if they were solo mining.

Speaking of mining a lot of coins, one of my rigs alone mined over 2000 SPR in around a month. That was also during the times when SPR was 40k-60k sats each.

While I developed the pool for the coin and had a closer look at the blockchain, I noticed that there were large farms mining this coin, of course there were also a few solominers, but the biggest amount of coins always went to the already big wallets (with private pools) so the distribution was even worse than with other coins which had "normal" distribution through pools.

tbh - without wanting to fud or spreading lies - this coin, it its original form, was/is the pump & dumpers dream - Control a big percentage of coin by being the one with the private pool, having an argument for others buying the coin (no pools and darkcoin like masternodes) and getting others involved in the coin too by telling them about the concept (in private) about the "project"..

While i was testing my pool, i mined A LOT of coins in the pool but no one ever noticed - shouldn't that be impossible because of the distribution charts etc. ? Well.. They had not much todo with the reality

It is surely no co-incidence that suddenly development stopped and big sells went through trex once pools started to pop up ... It is a real pity that the bittrex-beta site is not up now, you could see it pretty well there...

I like the concept of masternodes and surely darkcoin needs a competitor but this coin is still based on an old codebase of darkcoin - the "no pools" stuff is simply not working and development stalled while distribution is unclear. I'd appreciate a fresh project with a decent name, "Spread" is really weird IMHO, fair launch and a nice development team - but SPR - in its current form - is branded.. Just think about Adam White for Darkcoin - you'll probably have some freaks here too all the time if you don't fix up the ground problems :-)

))) detective )

No, I'm still in the dark about what you're referencing, could you at least provide a link to one of the questions about the distribution?

Cheers

Graham

FWIW Dept:

Bitcredit has a masternode implementation on test:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10781381

In this implementation they would appear to be termed “bank nodes” and this description hints at functionality:

“Your node earns you between 1000 and 2000 BCR a week for processing tx, escrow and acting as insurer of large transactions.”

Bitcredit github source for code mavens.

Cheers

Graham

Lol, good one  

It`s amazing how many people are anti-SPR. That makes things even MORE clearer 

Oh wow just one post about "fresh distribution" and within a few minutes already three posts to NOT relaunch with a fresh chain..

That makes things even clearer ;-)

I`d advise not to. A few large wallet addresses are inactive, as well as during the past 3-4 weeks, a lot of SPR has changed hands. Coin distribution is not a valid concern with SPR.

strange suggestion, to say the least.

Cheers

In what respect? I'd be grateful if you could outline the perception.

Cheers

Graham