Lets launch a crypto symbol standard, rather than having to work to the existing international currency standards (fuck'em).
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=46121
ServiceNodes can be the guardians of the universal crypto standards and people would need to make an application for inclusion based on simple rules, like: 'well, no one else is using it'
Why?
Well, partly because its an international club and you have to be approved by someone in a suit who imposes too many complex and self grandiose rules. Fuck'em.
Partly because it costs a lot. Fuck'em.
Partly because crypto is about more than currency. Oh, yeah baby. still, fuck'em.
Partly, just because and they didn't reach out to crypto. So, fuck'em.
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 56. (Read 810098 times)
March 18, 2015, 11:00:28 AM
March 18, 2015, 02:46:08 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
The miners are fully based on the normal source, there is just a encryption key within the code which encrypts communication between miner and pool - so yes - the source is fully available, just without the key
Yeah. Sure. If You say so... I believe cointellect guys will tell me the same. Based on "normal source". And only "something" within the code. Additionaly breaking open source code rules...
Actually, his description doesn't violate the GPL at all. I'd like to see this available source code, as I'm somewhat interested.
I don't know about descriptions that violate or not, bug his acting does violate. Releasing binaries based on changed GPL code without publishing source code is violating GPL. If he keeps binaries compiled from changed GPL source code for himself, than everything is OK. But he is releasing them for public use without source, so...
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhoHasThePower
Quote
Does the GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public? (#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic)
The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization.
But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL.
Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you.
The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization.
But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL.
Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you.
March 17, 2015, 07:09:46 PM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
The miners are fully based on the normal source, there is just a encryption key within the code which encrypts communication between miner and pool - so yes - the source is fully available, just without the key
Yeah. Sure. If You say so... I believe cointellect guys will tell me the same. Based on "normal source". And only "something" within the code. Additionaly breaking open source code rules...
Actually, his description doesn't violate the GPL at all. I'd like to see this available source code, as I'm somewhat interested.
im VERY interested as I would like to COMPILE IT LOCALLY ...
my apologies - did I just CAPS and repeat myself again
...right now - spreadminer for nvidia and nonce are our only saviours for mining this coin more efficiently ... tanx to sp ( and tsiv ) and nonce of course for the miner and pool ...
the amd miners are not mining spr due to the lack of 'good' optimized miners ...
though im sure wolf - you would have something in the pipeline if u wanted to 'look' at sgminer for spreadx11
...#crysx
March 17, 2015, 05:21:18 PM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
The miners are fully based on the normal source, there is just a encryption key within the code which encrypts communication between miner and pool - so yes - the source is fully available, just without the key
Yeah. Sure. If You say so... I believe cointellect guys will tell me the same. Based on "normal source". And only "something" within the code. Additionaly breaking open source code rules...
March 17, 2015, 05:16:34 PM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
[/quote]
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
[/quote]I didn't try his miners but it seems linux version are with full source
.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
[/quote]
No source for the downloaded executables at pointed link.
March 17, 2015, 07:27:13 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
The miners are fully based on the normal source, there is just a encryption key within the code which encrypts communication between miner and pool - so yes - the source is fully available, just without the key
still waiting for my ones mate
...ccminer and sgminer ... fedora 19 x64 ...
#crysx
March 17, 2015, 05:40:29 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
The miners are fully based on the normal source, there is just a encryption key within the code which encrypts communication between miner and pool - so yes - the source is fully available, just without the key
March 17, 2015, 05:21:30 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
March 17, 2015, 04:51:07 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Where are the links?? I must have missed it.Also, I am going to say this again but very simply... (how to remove pools)
We make it so that block is just a hash and does not relate to a mining address at all.
Then once a miner finds a valid block, we somehow get masternodes to confirm that a specific address mined it. (the miner submits his address to the masternodes with the block data)
This means that when a pool's miners finds a block, the block finder can swap out the pool's address with his address when he submits it to the masternodes. No one will know if he was mining as part of the pool or not because the submitted block has no information that relates it to the pool.
March 17, 2015, 02:31:40 AM
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages:Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
March 17, 2015, 01:29:46 AM
Whoever wants to mine this can get in with the difficulty low at under 11, way better than the 60 when things where happening for SPR.
March 17, 2015, 12:35:44 AM
Thanks for this head's up!
I wish I could comment in more technical depth but I'm still building an understanding of the implementation strategy.
Cheers
Graham
you seem to be doing better than i am at the moment mate
...#crysx
March 16, 2015, 10:55:08 PM
Thanks for this head's up!
I wish I could comment in more technical depth but I'm still building an understanding of the implementation strategy.
Cheers
Graham
March 16, 2015, 09:34:26 PM
FWIW Dept:
Bitcredit has a masternode implementation on test:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10781381
In this implementation they would appear to be termed “bank nodes” and this description hints at functionality:
“Your node earns you between 1000 and 2000 BCR a week for processing tx, escrow and acting as insurer of large transactions.”
Bitcredit github source for code mavens.
Cheers
Graham
Bitcredit has a masternode implementation on test:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10781381
In this implementation they would appear to be termed “bank nodes” and this description hints at functionality:
“Your node earns you between 1000 and 2000 BCR a week for processing tx, escrow and acting as insurer of large transactions.”
Bitcredit github source for code mavens.
Cheers
Graham
Thanks for this head's up! Amazed at how many here seemed to miss your post completely.
I just read through all 34 pages of that ANN and the dev there seems legit and quite skilled...almost Mr. Spread-like. Definitely worth watching the masternode implementation (March 31 I think).
JL
He actually has some pretty good ideas he is implementing besides the MN.
March 16, 2015, 09:25:18 PM
FWIW Dept:
Bitcredit has a masternode implementation on test:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10781381
In this implementation they would appear to be termed “bank nodes” and this description hints at functionality:
“Your node earns you between 1000 and 2000 BCR a week for processing tx, escrow and acting as insurer of large transactions.”
Bitcredit github source for code mavens.
Cheers
Graham
Bitcredit has a masternode implementation on test:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10781381
In this implementation they would appear to be termed “bank nodes” and this description hints at functionality:
“Your node earns you between 1000 and 2000 BCR a week for processing tx, escrow and acting as insurer of large transactions.”
Bitcredit github source for code mavens.
Cheers
Graham
Thanks for this head's up! Amazed at how many here seemed to miss your post completely.
I just read through all 34 pages of that ANN and the dev there seems legit and quite skilled...almost Mr. Spread-like. Definitely worth watching the masternode implementation (March 31 I think).
JL
March 16, 2015, 08:32:23 PM
Who cares about *.net and *.com, most valuable TLD in cryptoland is *.org anyway.
That's why I just registed servicenode(s).org
That is cool.
I only care because of priority rights arguments. But those sites are blank, so you are good to go.
Contribution incoming (well, incoming tomorrow)
March 16, 2015, 08:26:02 PM
Who cares about *.net and *.com, most valuable TLD in cryptoland is *.org anyway.
That's why I just registed servicenode(s).org
March 16, 2015, 07:59:32 PM
so
http://servicenodes.com/
and
http://servicenodes.net/
are taken, but not operational at this time. That's positive news.
A basic US trademark search shows up
search here]http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4810%3Ad699v.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=servicenodes&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24ALL&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query]search here
Also good.
http://servicenodes.com/
and
http://servicenodes.net/
are taken, but not operational at this time. That's positive news.
A basic US trademark search shows up
search here]http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4810%3Ad699v.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=servicenodes&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24ALL&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query]search here
Also good.
Then I say, lock it, pack it, and sell it.
March 16, 2015, 07:54:58 PM
so
http://servicenodes.com/
and
http://servicenodes.net/
are taken, but not operational at this time. That's positive news.
A basic US trademark search shows up
search for trademarks for yourself here
Also good.
http://servicenodes.com/
and
http://servicenodes.net/
are taken, but not operational at this time. That's positive news.
A basic US trademark search shows up
search for trademarks for yourself here
Also good.
March 16, 2015, 07:41:39 PM
I also voted spreadnodes on spreadcointalk
I first chose servernodes, but I have changed my vote to servicenodes, because it just sounds more compelling.
+101
I've come to really love the concept of "Servicenodes"
If you place a copyright mark against it, then you begin to place a marker in the sand that you intend to protect that name or you rely on it for commercial reasons.
If someone else makes an application to trademark that name, you can object on the basis that it was in ordinary use and you made a point of assigning some reliance on the distinct name for the benefit of the network. You can also use evidence of when you started using the name for the benefit of the network. This is useful to establish priority rights.
edit
ServiceNodes TM
I could get on board with ServiceNodes....just want to see them come out.
Jump to: