Topic: ⭐️ [ANN] [STO] Cancer Treatment Proven Since '09 ⭐️ MINIMUM INVESTMENT ONLY $90 ⭐️ - page 41. (Read 8237 times)

For professional Angel investors, it is their way of earning money, and they are very good in project analysis. But, there is no so many specialists in this field here on this forum. That's the problem. These investors need something more to trust you. That is why it is so important for you to visit events and give people here a photo/video report from there. For now, they are talking for a person who says that he is Gary, and he works with Dr.Tsang. In fact, there is no fact or proves, that it is true, and people here do not believe in words since 2018. Give people proves that you are real person, that Dr. Tsang is really working with you, that your approach is really exist and than you can rely on investments.

Multiple Comments and Responses

NO!!! you did not read that correctly.  IN the US under Regulations D exemption, we can only accept 34 non accredited investors IN THE US under Reg D.   THIS IS FOR US INVESTORS.    International investors invest under REGULATION S.  Under REGULATION S there are NO restrictions requiring a investor to be an accredited investor.


Nor do I.  I have been told I needed more well know names in the ICO world to be advisors.  So what I understand about this is if I put names of well know people as advisors who most now require payment, people will invest in a project because I have paid a well know advisor to be on the project.

Never mind that the people working or advising AdSana now are experts in their fields.  I guess that does not matter.

Gary


Most Angel investors put up $100,000 or more.  So they are risking a lot more. 

It is very profitable to invest in a project at the very beginning of it's' way, but it also the most dangerous investments. Talking about AdSana, I'm sure, that angel investing is not dangerous at all.

We will share quarterly reports with the investors and make them available for the general public to read.  But as for helping people invest.  There will not be a STO to invest in once we have raised the money and start building the clinics.  The only way then would be to buy on a secondary market exchange at what ever the price is then.  Which I believe will be much higher than the now $0.10 USD.  The best part of investing in a STO, just like a ICO, IEO or even in the going public with a IPO, is the change to get into an investment at the ground floor.

All of you have to stop comparing our company and what we are going to do with phase one, our Canine Cancer Centers in the US, is that we are not a typical Blockchain company that has only a MVP and are trying to raise money to hopefully create an app or company that is unique and needed. Because we are NOT THEM.  We are NOT another Blockchain company creating another software app that is like 10 others already being used.  How many more VIOP or messaging or text softwares does a world need.

We have something that has been killing cancer in people since 2009.  We have connections to several millions of dogs owners in the US due to the strong connections I, Gary Nice, have created since 2006 thru the National Canine Cancer Foundation.  Our price of our token will NOT go from the $0.10 USD to $0.000010 USD like other ICO tokens have.  Yes maybe there will dip once all the bounties that have tokens immediately sell their tokens after holding on to them for 90 day.  But if we use all the tokens allocated for bounties that is only 3% so it will not effect it that must.  But once our clinics are open and dogs are being cured and the media is talking about it, all those people who held onto their tokens will be very very happy.

So invest now.  You will never be able to invest into Adsana for the low token price you can now.!!!  You will have to pay a lot more.

Do I understand right, that only 34 investors who are not residents of US can invest in the project under US registration?

HI Lora, the laws have been that way for awhile.  They said it is to protect the Investor.  But being limited in the US to just Accredited Investors is very limiting.  Here is the definition of an accredited investor in the US.

To be an accredited investor, a person must have an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 for joint income. A person is also considered an accredited investor if he has a net worth exceeding $1 million, either individually or jointly with his spouse. An entity is an accredited investor if it is a private business development company or an organization with assets exceeding $5 million.

The Reg D only allows for 34 unaccredited investors. A regulations S for International investors does not have those high restrictions which is why I am trying to raise this money via International Investors.

I think it can be a time for blockchain usage. No doubt, that this technology can solve such problem as hacking.

Don't you think that electronical voting can be hacked, and votes can be used to pursue the goals of some people?

In many cases, a shareholders ' meeting with real people is just a tribute to tradition. Vote counting and decision-making can be done electronically.

Well, in that my post I've told that I remembered several STO projects, that had conducted their sales in 2018. So, yes, this practice was in used before.

I think, that there won't be meeting at all. I think, that the question will be placed for voting on AdSana's app, and all shareholders will have a posibility to vote one time.

I'm sure that it is very good, when investors are happy. Happy investor will want to buy more tokens, so the price will raise up.

The above was a conversation
...ect

My question about investors related to this. I'm interested..Was there such practice in other projects?

Shareholders meeting is use in ordinary business, when many investor are very reach people, so they can fly to this meeting from anywhere. Talking about crypto, we know, that it is not so rare, when shareholder is not a reach person. That's why I think that all meetings will be online.

What exact do you mean, when you are asking if investor can decide for themselves? 2nd question is interesting for me too.

Can investors decide for themselves? Well, according to the analogy of the shareholders ' meeting...Was it practiced in the cryptosphere? Or does it all depend on the team?

Can you explain please why do you think that is bad, when investors get big or "too much" profits? As for me, it is good.

If i'm not wrong, you have described affiliate program, but not an airdrop. So, what is planning by the team and when?

As far as I remember, there should be only one airdrop, such as I've discribed above. But that is not for sure.

Airdrop is good for the bounty hunters of course, but I think the project pays more attention to investors. There was information that they want to increase their number.