Topic: ⭐️ [ANN] [STO] Cancer Treatment Proven Since '09 ⭐️ MINIMUM INVESTMENT ONLY $90 ⭐️ - page 37. (Read 8215 times)

What you are doing is multiposting and is not allowed on the forum. Even worse because is against the forum rules and you can be punished especially that you post 7 posts in a row.

This should be one long post with all quotes and answers inside. You are still Junior member so I guess didn't know about this.

I would suggest to edit one post and delete others before moderators will step in.

Is there a likelihood of reversibility of the treatment process? I read that it happens that some small cancer cells still remain, apparently all the harmful cells are not completely removed, and the cancer manifests itself again.

---

.

With $10 million and even more with $25 Million we can do it.  You must realize that our growth is also dependent on opening at least 10 to 20 and using part of the profits from them to open more clinics.  We need about $500,000 to $700,000 to open a Canine Cancer Center AND have enough to fund the operation cost for one year.  We do not expect to have to support a clinic for one year.  We fully expect profits to exceed operating cost fairly quickly.  But I also try and have back up funds for operating cost. 

We can even do this plan with only 3 clinics but it will take longer.

Gary
[/quote]


I think you need not only to hold bounty companies and attract investors, but also to attract the media and talk about your noble goals, I think this will help a lot.

---

I think the main thing here is not to invest, or not, but to invest for what purpose, in such a project you cannot pursue the goal of only making money, here you need to think that this is a project designed to help people, the noble goal of the project.

---

I think investors don’t really care how the treatment is carried out, and it’s unlikely that they understand something, the main thing is to have some guarantees that the project will succeed and that the clinics will really be built and bring profit to the project, and therefore profit for investors.

---

Unfortunately, no one is so eager to find and buy a cure for cancer, it is beneficial for many powerful people to get sick and spend a lot of money on operations, procedures and medicines, unfortunately this is now a business.

---

I think there will be a lot of people who want to try treatment, especially if this is a chance to avoid chemotherapy, because it really has a very detrimental effect on the human body.

---

Yes, mine is very important in investing - some guarantees that there will be profit, and even if not immediately, but gradually there will be a plus. As I have said many times - now few projects can save the value of the token after going public, it’s a big deal right now.

---

The main thing is that the people in the hands of who will have this medicine remain people and do not sell it for crazy money, so that they don’t give a damn about other people's lives.

I see that you have an honest budget. I even thought that you might not have enough money to open a network of clinics. Alas, I do not know how much it costs in the USA.
[/quote].

With $10 million and even more with $25 Million we can do it.  You must realize that our growth is also dependent on opening at least 10 to 20 and using part of the profits from them to open more clinics.  We need about $500,000 to $700,000 to open a Canine Cancer Center AND have enough to fund the operation cost for one year.  We do not expect to have to support a clinic for one year.  We fully expect profits to exceed operating cost fairly quickly.  But I also try and have back up funds for operating cost.  

We can even do this plan with only 3 clinics but it will take longer.

Gary

  Agree. I’m used to being a long-term investor, I don’t know how to trade, but forgetting about my assets for a while is so easy.)

Yes it is a good investment when you look at treating dogs with cancer BUT only if the treatment works.  

So... I am going to make an effort to be as detailed as possible to show you how the treatment works. It is proprietary but I can explain quite a bit.

Here we go:  All cells have what are called MDR protein pumps.  Think of them like a like a straw and when a cell senses something wrong entering the cell, the MDR's will basically pump it out.

One of those drugs that cells reject with the MDR protein pumps are chemotherapy drugs. That is why with normal Chemotherapy treatment, they use such large doses of Chemotherapy drugs to try and kill the cell.  Because as the chemo is entering the cell, the MDR pump is getting it out of the cell.  So if they use large doses of the chemotherapy drug, some hopefully will stay in the cancer cells and kill the cancer.  Hopefully!   That is also why patients have terrible side effects.  Because of these large doses of the chemo patients can make the patient nauseated, they can't eat and they lose their hair plus other side effects.

So what if we could temporarily, say for 70 minutes, turn off the MDR protein pumps? The result would be that even, if we use small doses of the chemo drugs, small enough to not produce bad side effect, the chemo would still work and kill the cancer cells.

So how do we get the cells to turn of their MDR portent pumps for this short period of time or better put how do we specifically turn off the MDR protein pumps in the cancer cells and the cancer stem cells which are the ones that spread the cancer.  

The answer is in understanding that cancer cells, and especially cancer stem cells, are producing at a fast rate and need a lot of energy to do this.  More than normal cells.  So if we for a period of say 70 minutes had a way to deprive the cancer cells of their energy source and because they are constantly grabbing what they need for energy before normal cells do, then IF WE depriving them of these sources of energy, we weaken the cancer cells to the point that they have no energy to properly and efficiently use their MDR protein pumps to eliminate the chemotherapy drugs EVEN when we only use 10% of the normal dose. Thus we are able to kill the cancer cells.

That is the treatment in a nut shell.  And we administer all the drugs, per treatment, over a 70 to 90 minute treatment session via an IV transfusion.  Treatments are most often administered twice a week.  The number of weekly treatments needed depends on the cancer and how far it has progresses.  

If your method of treating dogs works well then why doesn't it work in humans? Drugs the same and probably have long approved by official medicine. People are being treated but many people continue to die of cancer. I do not argue that cancer is incurable at all. But there are different types and stages of cancer. Although the genome of dogs and humans are similar, but there are probably significant differences.

I see that you have an honest budget. I even thought that you might not have enough money to open a network of clinics. Alas, I do not know how much it costs in the USA.

Everyone who gets the treatment needs to sign a NDA.  So we can sue them if they do that.  There is no trademark. That is used for words or statements.  No license and the only patent is a Process Patent.  Not a product patent.  Process patent, patents the process or way we use the drugs in combination.  We have those but we also have the trade secret laws in the US where if we alway protect ourselves by having everyone sign a NDA and someone break that agreement then we can sue them and if we win we get 3x the award given by the court.  So if the damages we are awarded are $10 million the losing party would have to pay us $30 million.  That is a significant deterrent.

Also if you read our website or this thread you will see that just alone in the US there are 89 million dogs and the statistics show that 25% of them will get cancer (22.25 million dogs would have cancer in their lifetime) and there are 6 million new cases of cancer in dogs each year.  Even if we had 200 clinics we could not treat a potentai 22 million dogs with cancer OR EVEN the 6 million new cases of cancer each year in dogs.

All we want to do it set up our clinics as the first to market and that we also have the inventor as part of the company.  And we believe that will have people coming to use first.

Also after December 2019, most veterinarian's will not be able to use our treatment.  Because our treatment uses injectable chemotherapy and there is a new law USP<800> that has new requirements. I wrote this earlier in this threat....As of December 31, 2019 at Midnight, a new compliant protocol that all Veterinarians, their staff and their facility must have takes effect. They must be in compliance with it by then if not they will be fined and can lose their license. It is called USP <800>.  This is specifically for using injectable chemotherapy which is what we use.  Any Veterianarian Clinice that plans to use injectable chemotherapy to treat dogs with cancer must make their clinic compliant.  The cost of equipment in each facility is around $200,000 or more.  Includes using a special zero pressure box to put the chemo into the spring.  And every must wear special gowns, gloves and masks. So many Vet clinics will not be able to afford that cost.  Each of OUR Canine Cancer Centers will be FULLY COMPLIANT.  This means more Vet clinics will have to refer their patients to us insuring that we will have a lot of referrals.

And because of these USP <800> laws the owners of the dogs can not be back in the treatment room so unless the dog can read and right they owners will not know how the treatment works.

Gary

Of course not but there are multiple ways to secure your product (in this case treatment) with special trading marks, licenses or even patents.

This is a simple and honest answer. I think it would be hard for you to convince me that there is no legal way to secure your product.

Just after one treatment, your special formula will be lost. If this is so special then they would send somebody who will make the treatment and describes everything with details later on.

Hi defyance,  You talk about testing on animals and you talk about the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from official medicine must be very different

I posted a response to you saying basically the same thing yesterday.  Here is that post below.  But let me add something first.  So if a dog has an infection and an person has an infection do you think the treatment is different.  The use the same drugs.  90% of all drugs used to treat dogs for various issues are actually human drugs that are use on humans for the same thing.  The are very few drugs created just for dogs.  And only ONE cancer drug.  The rest of the drugs used to treat cancer in dogs are human cancer drugs being use as "grey label or off label" when using a human drug on dogs.

So again here is the post from yesterday to your comment

Let me tell you a true story.  In 2003,  the National Institute of Health (NIH) alone with biomedical and veterinary researchers around the globe, started the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A team led by Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Ph.D., of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., and Agencourt Bioscience Corp., Beverly, Mass., successfully assembled the genome of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). The breed of dog sequenced was the boxer, which was chosen after analyses of 60 dog breeds found it was one of the breeds with the least amount of variation in its genome and therefore likely to provide the most reliable reference genome sequence.  They spent $30 million USD doing this.

Now if you read that closely what was started was the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Yet they used a dog for sequencing or mapping the genome sequence.

So you might ask why did they use a dog in a Genome Research project for humans?  

Well one of the reasons is that they believe the cures for most cancer in humans will come from cancer research in dogs.  Because dogs get cancer like humans.  Before this, when working with mice and such, they would insert under the skin a certain cancer tumor and then try to treat it.  But with dogs, they get cancer in the same places as people.  They get lung cancer, breast cancer, prostrate and others.  So when researchers work with treating dogs that have cancer, 90% of that research will translate (also work on) to people.

So the reason the NIH was willing to spend $30 million to map the genome of the dog as part of the National Human Genome Research is WHY I can say confidently that this treatment will work on both dogs and people.  And remember, that it has already been working successfully on people since 2009.

Gary

You can read all about it at this link https://www.genome.gov/12511476/2004-advisory-dog-genome-assembled

If you look at things more soberly that the project can be seen as an investment in running the business treatment of dogs. In my opinion, the victory over cancer is still very far away.

Hi wwzsocki, if you look over this thread I have said countless times THIS IS NOT A NEW DRUG.  We are using two already existing FDA approved drugs in a way never used before.  So since we do not have a new drug, there is no pharmaceutical company that would pay us billions.  They only buy new drugs so they can make billions.  Cancer treatment is a big industry that drives high costs to create new drugs which then cause high prices for the new drugs.  We don't play that game.

You have not heard this for one very good reason.  Ready?  Because hospitals, and drug companies cannot make billions off of our treatment. 

Dr. Tsang once convinces a Oncologist to treat a patient in Hong Kong.  The Oncologist treated the person and after they were cancer free Dr. Tsang asked if the Oncologist would like to treat more people and the Oncologist said "No I can't make any money with this treatment".

There is the best answer I can give you.  Hospitals, Oncologist and other have too much money invested in equipment, expensive drugs to give it up to treat people for less than most co-pays for present day cancer payments.  Oncologists on the average make $500,000 a year.  They have to make that and their overhead some how.  We pay our employees well but we are NOT going to over charge for the treatment.

Now to this comment of yours .  So are you saying that if you had spent years developing this treatment that uses in combination various chemotherapy drugs along with one other drug that has been used daily for over 25 years that you would just go out and tell everyone how to use these two drugs.  Don't you think that other doctors and veterinarians would not just go start using the treatment themselves.  We are not trying to hide it forever.  We know that is impossible.  But we want for a few years to be the only clinics with the treatment so we can give our investors a fair return on their investment.  Then we will start teaching it and licensing out the treatment to others.

Gary

A really working cancer drug would be a revolution in medicine. and people with only a small part of the rights (investment) to this drug could become very rich people. But the problem is that no one knows when such a drug will be created.

Well definitely, they will give profit to any investors, this is the reason why they held this kind of projects here in this business industry
of crypto world as well. But they're not giving any promises to any investors who will get interest to support this one.

Good idea.  Another good idea is to buy some SANA tokens and hold

As I understood the project does not promise investors a quick profit, but promises them to participate in the profits of the company and ensures that the price of the token will not fall. That's interesting.

Many medicines and medical techniques are tested on animals. But develop and real use are not the same, especially if it's for people. I don't know all the testing stages, but should be clinical trials at least. I also think that different types of cancer need different drugs and techniques. Therefore, between the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from the point of view of official medicine  must be a very big difference.

Of course, a lot more people would invest if they will be able to verify if the procedure works in real life.

I just don't believe that you are not exposing all details because are afraid that somebody stills your technology.

To be honest, if there is a working treatment against cancer then this is like a holy grail and pharmaceutic companies would pay billions to get it. Additionally, if this really works from 2009 then multiple treatments have to be made to this date so I assume if anybody wants he could have all the details a long time ago.

Sorry, but i don't believe it. I haven't heard anything about a cure for cancer so far.

Hi ardor, there will always be people selling but when the news hits about the clinics there will be more wanting to buy in my opinion

Also this is NOT a ICO with no real product so it will NOT have to be kept stable artificially.  This is a real business, a real working product and will have revenue and profit.  So this will behave more like stocks instead of cryptocurrency.

Four things will affect it:

1.   Supply and Demand. 

2.   Earnings of the company

3.   Investors look at the capitalization of the company

4.   And fourth, the industry itself.

We know the industry is huge.  Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, two University of Chicago researchers, estimate a 1 percent reduction in mortality from cancer has a value to Americans of nearly $500 billion. A cure for cancer worldwide would be worth about $50 trillion. — Science Daily.

True to notice. I myself am watching with great interest and plan to invest in the project. Really unusual idea and approach.
[/quote]

I hope to see your investment soon

Gary



[/quote] Hi Gary! Thanks you explained very well. If you can build a network of clinics, then the profit will be very substantial. From this, the capitalization of the company itself and stocks will grow.