I think this is the only coin where I can run my 980's at 1.6 Ghz.
what's the speed of 980?i am shaking the 280x.
Topic: [ANN] [SUP] Supcoin, PLUCK algorithm, Just Launched, Mine Now! - page 24. (Read 62226 times)
February 21, 2015, 10:13:44 AM
i am shaking the 280x.
February 21, 2015, 10:12:35 AM
Yeah if wolf0 realese cpu optimization, made equilibrium with nvidia miner,
I said we need someone whose best interest is that the coin's distribution is fair...
February 21, 2015, 10:10:10 AM
Yeah if wolf0 realese cpu optimization, made equilibrium with nvidia miner,
February 21, 2015, 10:06:10 AM
I think this is the only coin where I can run my 980's at 1.6 Ghz.
February 21, 2015, 10:02:51 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
By removing it.
The point is we need someone with basic compile knowledge, that wants to help the coin's fair distribution to update the miners.
I believe earlz can arrange this easily
February 21, 2015, 10:01:13 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
By removing it.
i noticed the gpu miner had removed this code,
February 21, 2015, 09:48:13 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
By removing it.
February 21, 2015, 09:43:39 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
By removing it.
February 21, 2015, 09:41:26 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
February 21, 2015, 09:29:58 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.
So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?
Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.
What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.
GPU's aren't even really that great on Pluck. With Wolf0's binary I am getting 2.5x what my GPU does, on my 4770k @ 4.5Ghz. I kind of love this algo. It's fair between CPU and GPU (suck it AMD
).Iv since put my CPUs back on the mining, but only the ones in PCs that have to be on in anyways. The price prospects look positive it seems.
February 21, 2015, 09:26:58 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.
So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?
Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.
What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.
GPU's aren't even really that great on Pluck. With Wolf0's binary I am getting 2.5x what my GPU does, on my 4770k @ 4.5Ghz. I kind of love this algo. It's fair between CPU and GPU (suck it AMD
). February 21, 2015, 09:08:21 AM
Code:
//note: off-by-one error is likely here...
for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)
sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.
if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.
February 21, 2015, 09:00:10 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.
So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?
Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.
What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.
February 21, 2015, 08:58:52 AM
...tested coinminers the last 14hours. worked out quite well.
the blockoverview is nearly the same on both pools: last 24h = 133%
but would be nice to get some more hash to get faster block times!
the blockoverview is nearly the same on both pools: last 24h = 133%
but would be nice to get some more hash to get faster block times!
Yes, it'll be really good if the hashes are spread over the pools, fees are the same on both pools so you get the same coins.
why not rise the fees on your pool to make people think about spreading the hash?
I cannot just rise the Fee while miners are mining.. It is like your landlord is rising your rent while you are in the flat
Of course you can - it's just a shitty thing to do unless you give them reasonable notice.
Also a good way to shit on your customer base.
+1 ;-)
February 21, 2015, 08:41:09 AM
Have any of you guys realized how fresh looking & smooth the wallet is due to it being based on Bitcoin 0.10 (includes headers-first, which significnalty speeds up syncing times)
I'm pretty sure SUP is one of the first ALT's to use its code base too.
I'm pretty sure SUP is one of the first ALT's to use its code base too.
February 20, 2015, 11:22:50 PM
Hey Wolf, how much faster is your optimized CPU miner?
If I wanted to learn how to make optimized miners where would I start? Assuming I know barely anything about coding but am eager to start.
If I wanted to learn how to make optimized miners where would I start? Assuming I know barely anything about coding but am eager to start.
I ran some quick tests on it to get current numbers - today I managed to improve SHA256 a ton, raising the stock miner hash by 32% by itself while using no special CPU features. Anyway, the following results are the stock cpuminer that Earlz wrote from his github, compiled with -march=native and -Ofast, versus my current working build compiled with the same, run on my i7-5930K (OC'd to 4.65Ghz) with 12 threads:
Stock (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/pluckhashstock-02202015-2.png
Modified (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/pluckhashwolf-02202015.png
The only processor features /explicitly/ used by my code is SSE2, which all 64-bit x86 CPUs are guaranteed to have. That is not to say the compiler didn't use others - but it had the same opportunity for the stock miner.
If you want to learn more about miners, optimizations, and lower level coding, I recommend you learn C, which is what I started with.
And.. I'm sorry, but I have to recommend you also become pretty good in x86 assembly. It's not easy, but it gives you an in-depth understanding of your target platform, and even if you don't use it often, it will help you write better code.
February 21, 2015, 08:07:37 AM
No AMD miner,no fairness!
February 21, 2015, 08:05:35 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.
So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?
February 21, 2015, 07:55:32 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.
February 21, 2015, 07:53:29 AM
I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused
As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?
Jump to: