Topic: [ANN] SuperNET NXT asset 12071612744977229797, SUPERNET KMD assetchain in summer - page 191. (Read 736772 times)

You have hopes which are against investors interest.
Why are acting like this? I don't get this at all.

You elaborate? Like this? "Right now, Chris has leveraged off the supernet brand to promote his websites. Now I cannot see anything substantial apart from sites anyone could make given enough talent and a few hundred dollars."

Please, at least raise conclusive concerns, based on facts and written clearly for everybody to understand.

Thank you,
Chris

I will respond later to the posts above but I hope James rejects that offer. I will elaborate as soon as I get the kids off to bed.

I've decided that it is to my interest to also include CoinBooking.net project into SuperNET, taking advantage of the marketing, promotion and traffic generated from the SuperNET project.
I've made an offer to James by cutting down my revenue share coming from CoinBooking.net, and sharing this with SuperNET.

I hope that he accepts my offer so that we can continue our love tale 
I apologize for handling this matter as a rookie

Thank you,
Chris

Almost certainly next Monday. Two days after volume drops to 3% a day, after the initial 2-week period, I think is the rule.
Since there was such a surge of interest early on, it's unlikely that any day will see 3% unless there is a big pick-up towards the end. Hence two days later = next Monday, presumably at 14:00 GMT.
Then a voting period to approve changes - I don't know how long this will take.

Maybe after jl777 sells his own NXT and BTCD to the public?

When is the official last date of the ICO? Since 2 -4 weeks is very vague

Ye, can you clarify plz when it's going to be closed?

Thanks for clarification.

So we're heading another week before closing the ICO?
I heard we're at 5100BTC....

Amen.
We risk becoming a cult where everyone is afraid to say anything critical, and everyone else is focused on outing the naysayers.

people have such a loose concept of words like "troll" and "fud"; they have become meaningless


it's good to see people making critical posts. if nobody posted their concerns with projects here, this place would deteriorate into scam city quickly. developers need to be put on the spot more

Concern troll detected... It only takes to 2 seconds to find the keywords.

I'm very sorry that you feel this way PondSea but I truly believe that is not fair to talk like this until you know for sure what I can deliver or not.
Yes, I create the new asset to get more money, but not for me, for the project.

I fully dedicate my time to those projects, working full time.
Have you tried doing so with any project? Not sleeping enough, not eating well, just working full time on a project.

You should try that some day, I bet it's gonna be a lot harder for you to speak like that after the experience.

How would supernet get a return? By having me here full time working to deliver the expected services.

True, I would have not raised the funds without the SuperNET partnership, and I'm truly thankful to James and his project.

"and how would the people that purchased assets at inflated prices make their money back." Please, if you go out there and buy an asset at inflated prices, that's not my fault at all. You should do your research before buying an asset, you should know how much that service backing up that asset is going to be valued at in the future. Please don't be like that, it's not fair at all.

"I'm saying this not out of hate or anything like that, but if this venture by Chris turns sour it would help to tarnish the supernet brand which is what I care about." I don't believe this at all

Thank you,
Chris

I can only do one thing right now, continue the development, deliver high quality services and make everybody happy.

Chris

Absolutely true James.

I made it very clear that this project is separate from SuperNET and it is more of a personal project.

NOTES:

- This project is developed by CoinEvolve but it is going to be separated from SuperNET;
- This project is not sharing profit with SuperNET;
- This project is only sharing 20% from Net Profit with EVOLVE and EVOLVE2 shareholders;
- This project is going to have a separate Shareholders base and separate funding;

I only posted the project in the original thread of CoinEvolve because:

- the project is developed by coinevolve team;
- the project shares 20% profit with EVOLVE and EVOLVE2 shareholders due to the fact that CoinEvolve team invests working hours into this project;

Results in, bringing more profit to CoinEvolve, bringing more revenue to EVOLVE and EVOLVE2 shareholders.

Chris

I have made advices to Chris, but apparently my English was not so easy to understand for him.

The SuperNET revenue sharing deal was for the coinevolve websites and no assets were involved. It was purely a revenue sharing arrangement.

So, for people that are assuming that these assets are having any direct relation to me or SuperNET, please understand that I am not having any influence on the asset issuings that Chris is doing. I suggest we all wait for the revenues before we make any judgements.

The coinevolve sites that are doing the revenue sharing with SuperNET will likely benefit from the SuperNET userbase

James

P.S. The asset issuer is the most important factor. The second most important is the details of the asset. You need to make sure you understand who the issuer is and what exactly the asset is for.

Right now, Chris has leveraged off the supernet brand to promote his websites. Now I cannot see anything substantial apart from sites anyone could make given enough talent and a few hundred dollars.

Instead of building the user base for the current asset, he creates a new one to get more money.

How would supernet get a return for the money it has helped generate for Chris (which he could not raise in a failed ipo before) and how would the people that purchased assets at inflated prices make their money back.

I'm saying this not out of hate or anything like that, but if this venture by Chris turns sour it would help to tarnish the supernet brand which is what I care about.

Due to the fact that the SuperNET will not be sending any traffic to this site and there being no direct link to SuperNET in any way for coinbooking, I cannot make a recommendation to purchase this asset.

James

some scammers have issued fake UNITY assets
The asset name will be SuperNET and it will be issued by NXT-MRBN-8DFH-PFMK-A4DBM
any other asset is a fake

To trade on an exchange you need 5 letters and SuperNET does not fit into 5 letters, so its trading symbol is UNITY but it is the SuperNET asset

Once the IPO is over, the TOKEN is transfered into UNITY, which will be the official tradable SuperNET coin/asset