Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 43. (Read 211762 times)

newbie
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
Hello guys wanted to ask about  avarage power usage of vegas 56 ( flashed to 64) im mining Ethernium  with  most of my card p7  1050 core , 875W ,  memory 1070 , 875 mW using memory tweakin Hashrate is around 49 mh , im goona rebuild my rigs from ground change risers and im thinking about buying single  PSU instead  dual PSUs

Wondering how strong would that 1 PSU need to be to handle  6x vegas 56 running on ETH hash
jr. member
Activity: 288
Merit: 1

It has been released on github. Todxx will post here shortly.

release available on github. tnx
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Team Red Miner v0.7.7 released

https://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releases

Changes in v0.7.7
  • Added support for Nimiq (dumb mode only).
  • Integrated a Nimiq node.js network proxy into the miner.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could lose shares, especially against lower vardiff pools.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could cause duplicate shares on startup for low-diff pools.
  • Fixed regression bug for ethash Nicehash, correct stratum mode now used again.

We now support Nimiq!

any news about haven fork support?


It has been released on github. Todxx will post here shortly.

THX
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Team Red Miner v0.7.7 released

https://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releases

Changes in v0.7.7
  • Added support for Nimiq (dumb mode only).
  • Integrated a Nimiq node.js network proxy into the miner.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could lose shares, especially against lower vardiff pools.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could cause duplicate shares on startup for low-diff pools.
  • Fixed regression bug for ethash Nicehash, correct stratum mode now used again.

We now support Nimiq!

any news about haven fork support?


It has been released on github. Todxx will post here shortly.
jr. member
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
Team Red Miner v0.7.7 released

https://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releases

Changes in v0.7.7
  • Added support for Nimiq (dumb mode only).
  • Integrated a Nimiq node.js network proxy into the miner.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could lose shares, especially against lower vardiff pools.
  • Fixed Nimiq bug that could cause duplicate shares on startup for low-diff pools.
  • Fixed regression bug for ethash Nicehash, correct stratum mode now used again.

We now support Nimiq!

any news about haven fork support?
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Haven Offshore fork will happen at block 640640 (20th of July around 15:00 UTC)

TRM suport this?

Need a new release, will work on it tonight.

NICe Smiley
thx
sr. member
Activity: 703
Merit: 272
Haven Offshore fork will happen at block 640640 (20th of July around 15:00 UTC)

TRM suport this?

Need a new release, will work on it tonight.

Will you be adding NAVI support?
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Haven Offshore fork will happen at block 640640 (20th of July around 15:00 UTC)

TRM suport this?

Need a new release, will work on it tonight.
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 1
Not All Who Wander Are Lost
Haven Offshore fork will happen at block 640640 (20th of July around 15:00 UTC)

TRM suport this?

nope
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Haven Offshore fork will happen at block 640640 (20th of July around 15:00 UTC)

TRM suport this?
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Is it possible to change config (for example --prog_config=B750) without using cmd? Or maybe add it in the future if not.

I was getting ready to sell my polaris cards with 4G memory but with 14,5 Mh/s on kawpow not so sure anymore Smiley Excluding power cost (kawpow being more power hungry), profitability seems to be same as eth mining 30 Mh/s.
jr. member
Activity: 71
Merit: 1
FYI, WTM defaults are using stock GPU settings - nowhere near what an actual tuned GPU should be running.  Those numbers are INCREDIBLY inefficient.

As livada said, ~2kh/s is very reasonable for pretty efficient settings (which should still be able to drive a monitor). You could stretch to 2.1+ if you wanted to push harder / be less efficient.

Wow I thought it was reasonable, will have to check this out.
member
Activity: 340
Merit: 29


Yeah I try to run conservatively as in not going for max hash but best power efficiency:

TUBE = 1.35 kH/s pool side for 160w at the wall

tube-haven-heavy give 2000+HR on any vega (56 or 64) and use etc 150W per cards
etc: 1 rig 6*vega56hynix = 960W at the wall = 12200kh etc
1 rig 4*vega56 samsung = 720W at the wall 8700kh etc

I dont use a dedicated mining rig.. its in a PC and has to drive a monitor and be able to do productive work in the day time - hence stable clocks. If you can tweak better - kudos but its a ballpark  Undecided

Also quick reference - 1 vega 56 on whattomine:



FYI, WTM defaults are using stock GPU settings - nowhere near what an actual tuned GPU should be running.  Those numbers are INCREDIBLY inefficient.

As livada said, ~2kh/s is very reasonable for pretty efficient settings (which should still be able to drive a monitor). You could stretch to 2.1+ if you wanted to push harder / be less efficient.
jr. member
Activity: 71
Merit: 1


Yeah I try to run conservatively as in not going for max hash but best power efficiency:

TUBE = 1.35 kH/s pool side for 160w at the wall

tube-haven-heavy give 2000+HR on any vega (56 or 64) and use etc 150W per cards
etc: 1 rig 6*vega56hynix = 960W at the wall = 12200kh etc
1 rig 4*vega56 samsung = 720W at the wall 8700kh etc

I dont use a dedicated mining rig.. its in a PC and has to drive a monitor and be able to do productive work in the day time - hence stable clocks. If you can tweak better - kudos but its a ballpark  Undecided

Also quick reference - 1 vega 56 on whattomine:

newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Please Vega 56 users, could you tell me your HR with CN heavy / Haven / Tube algo(s) ?

Thx in advance.

Yeah I try to run conservatively as in not going for max hash but best power efficiency:

TUBE = 1.35 kH/s pool side for 160w at the wall

tube-haven-heavy give 2000+HR on any vega (56 or 64) and use etc 150W per cards
etc: 1 rig 6*vega56hynix = 960W at the wall = 12200kh etc
1 rig 4*vega56 samsung = 720W at the wall 8700kh etc

Nice which clocks do you use? mem core volts?

mem 900-920mhz 862mv (hynix)
mem 1098-1100mhz 862mv (samsung)
gpu 1440mhz 807mv

u must use AMD tweek for this HR.
read this topis for vega tweak https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123724.1080

etc amd tweek : for tube with vega56 @vega 64 bios (samsung)- WinAMDTweak.exe --i 0,1,2,3 --RAS 28 --RCDRD 12 --RCDWR 5 --RC 44 --RP 12 --RRDS 3 --RRDL 3 --REF 15600 --RFC 246 --FAW 14
hero member
Activity: 760
Merit: 500
CryptoZilla
Please Vega 56 users, could you tell me your HR with CN heavy / Haven / Tube algo(s) ?

Thx in advance.

Yeah I try to run conservatively as in not going for max hash but best power efficiency:

TUBE = 1.35 kH/s pool side for 160w at the wall

tube-haven-heavy give 2000+HR on any vega (56 or 64) and use etc 150W per cards
etc: 1 rig 6*vega56hynix = 960W at the wall = 12200kh etc
1 rig 4*vega56 samsung = 720W at the wall 8700kh etc

Nice which clocks do you use? mem core volts?
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Please Vega 56 users, could you tell me your HR with CN heavy / Haven / Tube algo(s) ?

Thx in advance.

Yeah I try to run conservatively as in not going for max hash but best power efficiency:

TUBE = 1.35 kH/s pool side for 160w at the wall

tube-haven-heavy give 2000+HR on any vega (56 or 64) and use etc 150W per cards
etc: 1 rig 6*vega56hynix = 960W at the wall = 12200kh etc
1 rig 4*vega56 samsung = 720W at the wall 8700kh etc
jr. member
Activity: 71
Merit: 1
160W is indeed very low power.

Yeah its ok and still good hash rate. This is actual figures using meter and not software under reporting.
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
160W is indeed very low power.
Pages:
Jump to: