Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] The First Litecoin PPS Pool (litecoinpool.org) - page 53. (Read 228559 times)

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
One more question plz.
The pool now implement VAR DIFF automatically. While can one fix a DIFF for each of his worker, manually and seperately?(Like some BTC pools I've mined with.)
Since I got a new problem:  Due to unstable network, some share lost ->  DIFF goes lower -> network load heavier --> more share lost --> DIFF even lower.
I think for some guys with a unstable network(like me), income variability is not so important as network load.
Usually when people ask for the ability to manually set share difficulty it's because they don't understand the underlying math, and naively think it's intrinsically better to have a low or high share difficulty.
I think this is the first time I hear a semi-valid justification for such a feature. However, if your network is that unstable, then you probably have much more serious problems (such as the amount of time you spend hashing stale data) than those caused by an unsuitably low share difficulty.

what is the average stale rate for you guys?  my gpus (7950s') are all averaging around 1.2-1.3% stale rate and was wondering if it is a little high?  
The pool average right now is 0.5%, with some users going as low as 0.03%.
However, software latency is sometimes unavoidable when GPU mining, so a stale rate around 1% is usually considered acceptable for GPU systems. Please note that this kind of latency is not due to your network connection or to the pool, but to the miner itself.

would lowering the intensity or clock settings affect the stale rate?  its weird because i recently build a new rig with 3x 280x and they are averaging only around 0.10%. 
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
One more question plz.
The pool now implement VAR DIFF automatically. While can one fix a DIFF for each of his worker, manually and seperately?(Like some BTC pools I've mined with.)
Since I got a new problem:  Due to unstable network, some share lost ->  DIFF goes lower -> network load heavier --> more share lost --> DIFF even lower.
I think for some guys with a unstable network(like me), income variability is not so important as network load.
Usually when people ask for the ability to manually set share difficulty it's because they don't understand the underlying math, and naively think it's intrinsically better to have a low or high share difficulty.
I think this is the first time I hear a semi-valid justification for such a feature. However, if your network is that unstable, then you probably have much more serious problems (such as the amount of time you spend hashing stale data) than those caused by an unsuitably low share difficulty.

what is the average stale rate for you guys?  my gpus (7950s') are all averaging around 1.2-1.3% stale rate and was wondering if it is a little high? 
The pool average right now is 0.5%, with some users going as low as 0.03%.
However, software latency is sometimes unavoidable when GPU mining, so a stale rate around 1% is usually considered acceptable for GPU systems. Please note that this kind of latency is not due to your network connection or to the pool, but to the miner itself.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
what is the average stale rate for you guys?  my gpus (7950s') are all averaging around 1.2-1.3% stale rate and was wondering if it is a little high? 

Network not behind proxy: 0.5% or lower.(Stratum)
Network behind proxy: 30% or so. (long poll)
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
what is the average stale rate for you guys?  my gpus (7950s') are all averaging around 1.2-1.3% stale rate and was wondering if it is a little high? 
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hi, Pooler, thanks for ur pool! It's wonderful. I played around from one year.

May I ask whether there is a port for long poll?
Because, my network banned stratum now.
Or if there is some relay methods?

I just can't connect stratum under current condition of my network.

The old getwork protocol, now deprecated, is still accessible at litecoinpool.org on port 9332. Be advised, however, that you will get a much higher stale rate if using getwork instead of Stratum.
Depending on how the ban is implemented, it may be possible to circumvent it by connecting through a SOCKS proxy located outside your network.

Great, It worked! Thank you.

One more question plz.
The pool now implement VAR DIFF automatically. While can one fix a DIFF for each of his worker, manually and seperately?(Like some BTC pools I've mined with.)
Since I got a new problem:  Due to unstable network, some share lost ->  DIFF goes lower -> network load heavier --> more share lost --> DIFF even lower.

I think for some guys with a unstable network(like me), income variability is not so important as network load.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
You should change cuurency to go to doge?
dogecoinpool.org?  Wink

thin, already taken!
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
Hi, Pooler, thanks for ur pool! It's wonderful. I played around from one year.

May I ask whether there is a port for long poll?
Because, my network banned stratum now.
Or if there is some relay methods?

I just can't connect stratum under current condition of my network.

The old getwork protocol, now deprecated, is still accessible at litecoinpool.org on port 9332. Be advised, however, that you will get a much higher stale rate if using getwork instead of Stratum.
Depending on how the ban is implemented, it may be possible to circumvent it by connecting through a SOCKS proxy located outside your network.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
Hi, Pooler, thanks for ur pool! It's wonderful. I played around from one year.

May I ask whether there is a port for long poll?
Because, my network banned stratum now.
Or if there is some relay methods?

I just can't connect stratum under current condition of my network.

Do you know if your network blocks stratum by port number (3333) or SPI?

First time I ever hear about this... as for gw ports, I think litecoinpool shut them down a couple of months ago.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hi, Pooler, thanks for ur pool! It's wonderful. I played around from one year.

May I ask whether there is a port for long poll?
Because, my network banned stratum now.
Or if there is some relay methods?

I just can't connect stratum under current condition of my network.
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
I'm already a member of this pool, but shouldn't you open registration to anyone since WeMineLTC is getting to be a bit larger? WMLTC is at 25% while litecoinpool.org is only at 8.5%. Try to pull miners away from WMLTC so they don't get too large. WMLTC + Unknown% = 48% of the network.
As a matter of fact, new users are being accepted every day, and I often see new miners coming from the larger pools.
That said, it's always been against my principles to actively try to "steal" users from other pools.

Personally I believe there is currently not enough awareness of this problem, and this can create a vicious circle: new miners tend to join the largest pool (because they naively think that bigger is better), which makes the pool even larger.
Mining should remain a decentralized effort. If you think a pool is getting too large, maybe you should direct your complaint to them, and try to raise awareness among miners about the dangers of centralization.

Related link: https://litecoin.info/Spread_the_Hashes
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I'm already a member of this pool, but shouldn't you open registration to anyone since WeMineLTC is getting to be a bit larger? WMLTC is at 25% while litecoinpool.org is only at 8.5%. Try to pull miners away from WMLTC so they don't get too large. WMLTC + Unknown% = 48% of the network.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
Yes, it's working fine again now, thank you
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
I have noticed that it's no longer possible to toggle the e-mail alert checkbox in the worker list.
Any idea why? Is the problem on my side or server side? Thanks.
It worked for me using Firefox 25, but now that you mention it I see why there could be a problem with other browsers.
Could you please try again and see if it works now?
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
I have noticed that it's no longer possible to toggle the e-mail alert checkbox in the worker list.

Any idea why? Is the problem on my side or server side? Thanks.

PS: I would suggest adding 'litecoinpool.org' somewhere inside the title of this topic. I tried to search for 'litecoinpool.org' and couldn't find it. I had to go to the website, and use the 'Forum' link from there.
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
hi i saw the top leaders on this pool and the number 1 was at  anonymous   361,046 kH/s   119.4 ltc/day  how dose that work? seems like that would be over 100 gpus
I think they're using about 500 GPUs, or at least that's what it looks like from the logs. Still, it probably isn't the largest GPU farm around.

also 290x or Radeon HD 7990  I was going to buy 3 290x but then i saw the 7990 did more unless i read it wrong
Hash rate is not the only thing you should consider when choosing a GPU. Energy efficiency and cooling are also very important. Miners would still prefer 7950s, despite there being faster GPUs. Alas, 7950s are nowhere to be found at the moment. The R9 280X and R9 290X are acceptable alternatives, as is the older 7970. The 7990 is a dual-GPU card, and tends to produce a lot of heat, so you need to make sure you have an adequate cooling solution if you want to use it for mining.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
hi i saw the top leaders on this pool and the number 1 was at  anonymous   361,046 kH/s   119.4 ltc/day  how dose that work? seems like that would be over 100 gpus

also 290x or Radeon HD 7990  I was going to buy 3 290x but then i saw the 7990 did more unless i read it wrong
hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
Got a question seeing the diff keeps rising , how about a lower payout threshold seeing the newest QT client clams to have lowered tx fees .. say a nice .01 would be perfect. Thanks
You are probably right. I will lower the minimum thresholds to 0.1 LTC for instant payments and to 0.05 LTC for automatic payments for the moment. If this turns out to be sustainable, I may lower the thresholds further.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
Congratulations for your nomination at SourceForge Smiley

Quote from: SourceForge.net Update
December Project of the Month

The December Project of the Month is CPUMiner, which is a tool that can be used to mine crypto-currencies. Read my interview with CPUMiner project admin "Pooler" on our blog to learn more about how it came about, who started it, and some other interesting details.

Congratulations to Pooler and the CPUMiner project on being selected as this month's POTM!
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 503
Got a question seeing the diff keeps rising , how about a lower payout threshold seeing the newest QT client clams to have lowered tx fees .. say a nice .01 would be perfect. Thanks

Icon

hero member
Activity: 849
Merit: 507
Nearly 1000 LTC mined since early this year and more than happy with the pool, congratulations!
Thank you! Smiley

Did you ever think about re-opening automated signup by referral only? I got a few friends of mine addicted and hate to say them to use other pools. One or two invites for power members at least? Like torrent sites Wink
I'll think about it, but for the moment you can simply tell your friends to send an application as described on the website. I have already accepted a lot of new users this way.
Pages:
Jump to: