Topic: [ANN] The Tratok Project, Disrupting A $7.6 Trillion Dollar Industry - page 11. (Read 29593 times)

lol...this idea has been tried before and failed.

this shitcoin will also fail just as badly.  watch.

just want to know what is advantage of tratok than any other "travel coin"?

It will be good at first just they have to keep building if they want it to last. Over all though i think it will be ok.

Hope. But I still have no idea how it's going to work. Therefore, it is rather desirable to see a working product to compare with other already existing applications, but not using cryptocurrency.

What is the next development of this project? I have participated in this program since October 2018 ago. happy this token can get a pretty good price for a cool motorbike.

In my last post I said that they are solving a real world problem with their token.

The admin of Bitcoin Talk forum deleted my message once again. I don't know why but they deleted it. This happens quite often to me.
Can anyone tell me why they are deleting my posts? They don't answer to my messages.

I try it once again:

They are solving a real money problem with their token because in the industry their is a big lack of transparency on the prices.
Therefore I give it a thumbs up.

how can it spread worldwide?

There will be no ICO?
What is your plan to rise funds in that case ?

Im not even sure if they can lead most of the competitors but since they have so many funds, they can beat some of the competitors.

Can I ask which aspect looks very weak? We always value constructive feedback as we want Tratok to be as successful as possible for the benefit of everyone.
Without an ICO, the product is already funded and demo released seven months early and lead by a team of fortune 500 executives (I have not seen another team where more than 60% of those involved have actual experience creating billion dollar revenue streams or introducing new products to new markets e.g. the smart credit card). In addition to a growing community and strong B2B developments, I believe we are actually in a stronger position that many of the others.

Let's consider two scenarios:

A.) Party A has raised millions in public funds, had 90% of shareholder value disappear, has no product, no ability to progress, are undergoing investigations and has upset and let down a lot of people. This is 99.9% of the industry.
B.) Party B is a registered entity which has given every token in circulation away for Free, launched seven months early, is realizing increased participation and adoption and has a clearly defined plan that is constantly being meet ahead of schedule. This is Tratok Ltd and a few others.

Bias aside, I think in every single case, nobody with a neutral point of view would pick A over B.

Tratok has smashed through its milestones and is embarrassing the others who have sat idle because it is quite the opposite of weak. It is strong. All the experts who said it couldn't be done have gone silent on LinkedIn.

This is what happens when you have social events like airdrops and to ensure widespread distribution. Tratok Ltd does not take, it gives things away which I believe is a major contributor to growth, goodwill and support from the public. Such support has helped us launch our demo seven months ahead of schedule. However caution is correct, I had seen comments showing support from people who clearly did not take the time to read about the project. Such behaviour is harmful to the community and all projects.


Business partners are doing their final stages of onboarding, a product has been released seven months ahead of schedule and already gone through one thorough round of beta testing and user experience refinement.  

the idea is correctly chosen by the team. it's important to know, because such decisions that the team has taken is quite necessary for the further development of the cryptocurrency industry

I agree , too many newcomers respond in the subject . You have to be careful about the information .

do not be offended but your project when compared with similar, looks very weak. in common and most importantly investors with money will not exactly exceed your numbers for profit and distribution. they simply can not be implemented.

"Disrupting a 7.6 Trillion Dollar Industry" is a pretty bold statement
And i see a lot of newbies and brand new Users posting.. so i am careful....

Many are hyping this up recently. Though, tourism industry is really a trillion dollar industry, but how far has been achieved by the team in terms of actual development?

the travel industry division is the most looked for after by numerous individuals, and this venture can possibly succeed, with a note that the guideline of exchange speed, trust, and diminishing reliance on outsiders, remains the primary concern being developed, at that point with it, all the mission will be accomplished well even to be worth $ 7.6 billion task isn't so troublesome.

In all countries tourist attractions are available, and you take the sector as a promising industry. travel and tourism are the main concepts of this platform. which countries work with your platform? for travel and tourism. What products make it easier for us to access this sector?

Email Address   :[email protected]

Facebook Username   :boualemakniou09

Twitter Username   :@koobrakoobra09

LinkedIn Username   : akniou09

Bitcoin Talk Username:tooba1940

Telegram Username   :@akniou09

Instagram Username   :akniou09

Reddit Username   : u/akniou09
   

Hello Saydia. As of the time of writing this, there are over 670,000 words of information on the project including weekly updates, milestones, team information and legal information. This is without including the almost daily updates via social media and the press and hours of AV presentations available on the websites and Tratok Ltd's different web properties. Compared with the industry this is a wealth of information. However, I understand that with so much information, one can simply decide to not make an effort to read as they find themselves overwhelmed. This is a problem our team encounters with certain community members that do not care about the actual value of disruptive capability of use cases but simply only care about "when moon?!". As a project that hopes to change the way people travel, we are interested in those who actually understand the technology rather than those who simply wish to speculate and expect unreasonable returns.

Regarding the ICO, had you taken 5 minutes to read this thread of the website, you would have seen there was no ICO as well as the reasoning behind this approach and the extensive and expensive feasibility studies conducted by a leading bank, two tourism boards and four sector economists that made us take this approach. However, instead of making this effort, you simply decided to comment that the project has "scant information". You are entitled to your opinion, as everyone is, but I do encourage you to actually read into the project and asses the impact it can have.