Topic: [ANN] [VIA] ★ Viacoin ★ ~ the future of digital currency ~ ★ - page 137. (Read 825875 times)

I have 55 MHs. with a real miner here at my home, and I've got on average 60 to 70 Via per day the last week, sometimes even more.
So these numbers on Genesis mining are way too low.

It seems our innocent price trolls are back. I refer again that the community has repeatedly requested enforcement of the moderation rules at post #2. Please remain on topic, no cross posting, please do not spam the thread with lots of useless posts and otherwise generate noise. If people are interested in price, I am sure they can look at the charts themselves and do not need a running commentary. The thread has improved a lot since the last reminder, let's keep it that way.

wow, 25mh can mine 8-25 coins per day, very hard to mine viacoin

If you do, use code JX0YpI

will save you 2.5%, and will add 2.5 mh/s (2.5% of 100) to my hashpower

wow quite good, im thinking of having 100 mhs perhaps

Great idea! here's what 5 days of 25 mh/s at Genesis has done for me so far:
http://puu.sh/d1enM/7085875c23.png

Cheers, I've PM'd you a link to the APK.

It should be noted that this is based on the latest revision of both bitcoinj and bitcoin-wallet which means that users on android 4.0.3 or below will not be able to install the wallet. Most devices should be compatible but some users may have to upgrade in order to use this wallet (or the new bitcoin wallet for that matter).

Stealing a quote from Andreas Schildbach on the benefits of the new wallet and bitcoinj 0.12.


As far as I'm aware this should be one of the first altcoin wallets to make use of 0.12.

Cheers.

It is really important that the community expresses their thoughts about this. Here is somebody who is working for all of us with no personal benefit. Dont be free riders on our common good. Express yourself and get involved in the discussion.

My opinion on this is that the token is a substitute for a community donation drive. So, buying those tokens is exactly that: donating for a community fund. Owning tokes does not constitute a stake in a project or endevour. If dividents are payed out, they have to be seen as another type of community building effort. Ying is not in any way offering an investment token but a donation token. The revenue is then used to support the network by mining. INAL

Btw: I think this should be posted on reddit which is underutilized by the community.

Thank you Ying for your effort!

I would love to test it! I will be available tonight.

Hey guys I need testers for the Viacoin Android wallet which is based on the latest version of the bitcoin wallet and bitcoinj 0.12. From my own testing everything looks good to go but I'd like to get some feedback from other users before I go ahead and release it on the play store.

If you're interested in giving me some feedback send me a PM and I'll get back to you with the APK.

I intend to release the source code over the next few days once I'm positive everythings looking good.

Cheers.

well, I thought of somehow tagged categories which can be searched like author, dicipline, scientific codes. You might also think of selling your scientific contribution but this would be against the ethics in the field I guess (for now at least). The designated area would be a special category of the notary.

who have it?

wow, did not expect this.... My favorite was the game token.

However, thank you very much erik and btcdrak for your via and xch. Yingsena and me are currently working on a plan to have some kind of community budget for future events like this.

GO VIA!

Pleased to announce the winner of "The future of ____" contest: KARMALA

The future of scientific contribution

Problem: Scientific research is becoming increasingly competitive. Research constitutes a major economic sector in terms of employment with millions of jobs at Universities and research institutes worldwide. The value in terms of future prospects of any researcher is measured in the amount and quality of peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals. It is the outmost important determinant of any careers in the sector. As it is said: “publish or vanish”. However, the peer-review process is slow and can take up to 2-3 years for a single publication (depending on the discipline). Moreover, high quality journals have a rejection rate of above 90%. Thus, a potential paper might go through several lengthy processes until publication. The final publication is then the proof that some concepts and results originated from a specific researcher. There are roughly 50 million published articles out there and the rat race for new ideas has intensified. A central building blog in the scientific discourse is the presentation of non-peer reviewed working papers on conferences and seminars prior to publication. Many scientific conferences only require handing in an extended abstract. Unfortunately, concepts and innovations presented in those forums are increasingly copied and pushed forward for peer-review by third parties. The scientific community has not introduced any useful methods to prevent this.

An attempt to prove that the initial scientific contribution belongs to a certain researcher is to upload a working paper in special online directories (e.g. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/ for agricultural economics). However, this service is (1) centralized and (2) does allow setting the time of publication to a point in the past! Thus, there is a total lack of “proof-of-scientific contribution” before the final publication in a peer-reviewed article. Any other sector knows copy-right protection mechanisms but they are absent in science. Eroded trust in the scientific network must find new trustless solutions.
Solution: The notary service on the clearinghouse protocol is able to solve this problem. The “proof-of-scientific contribution” can be realized by the immutability of the block chain. A document containing a scientific contribution can be associated with the public address of the individual researcher. A history of immutable contributions can solve any dispute during a later peer-review process and discourages the theft of ideas in the first place. Hashes of the contribution papers can be published on the websites of institutes proving that a certain contribution has existed at a certain time. Transfer of ownership is not applicable to this problem as the originator of a scientific contribution is immutable. However, searchable content might be an advantage. That is, additional meta-data about the discipline, methodology and focus should be stored on the block chain and be searchable by a specific block explorer. Any individual or institution could thus browse in real time through the advancement of global scientific contributions. No economic or political interests can latter change or circumvent a scientific contribution. Thus, I propose a sub-section of the notary in the clearwallet with is designated for non-published contributions and a function to store additional meta-information together with the hash. Transfer of ownership should be disabled for this application.



Thanks to all those who participated! Karmala, you'll be receiving 1000 VIA and 10,000 XCH shortly! (500 from me, 500 + the 10,000 XCH from drak)

All of the submissions were excellent, and I'd love to see them pursued. If you'd like any help with working to bring them to life, reach out!

imho, Viacoin/XCH value proposition is especially beneficial for games.

I cam across this - a minecraft game with bitcoins -
http://bitquest.co

these are the admins- http://bitquest.co/whoweare

I would be happy if someone from the community that understands games and via/XCH API integration approach them and start a discussion.
You never know...

hash rate  is the key for the price base.
bter is good for us.

github says it is update to difficulty targeter and fix a bug that yields 5% less blocks found daily than intended

New things implemented?

What happens then? Did I missed something?

in ~7 days.